A multicenter assessment of single-cell models aligned to standard measures of cell health for prediction of acute hepatotoxicity.

Assessing the potential of a new drug to cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. We therefore determined whether cell models currently used in safety assessment (HepG2, HepaRG, Upcyte and primary human hepatocytes in conjunction with basic but commonly used endpoints) are actually able to distinguish between novel chemical entities (NCEs) with respect to their potential to cause DILI. A panel of thirteen compounds (nine DILI implicated and four non-DILI implicated in man) were selected for our study, which was conducted, for the first time, across multiple laboratories. None of the cell models could distinguish faithfully between DILI and non-DILI compounds. Only when nominal in vitro concentrations were adjusted for in vivo exposure levels were primary human hepatocytes (PHH) found to be the most accurate cell model, closely followed by HepG2. From a practical perspective, this study revealed significant inter-laboratory variation in the response of PHH, HepG2 and Upcyte cells, but not HepaRG cells. This variation was also observed to be compound dependent. Interestingly, differences between donors (hepatocytes), clones (HepG2) and the effect of cryopreservation (HepaRG and hepatocytes) were less important than differences between the cell models per se. In summary, these results demonstrate that basic cell health endpoints will not predict hepatotoxic risk in simple hepatic cells in the absence of pharmacokinetic data and that a multicenter assessment of more sophisticated signals of molecular initiating events is required to determine whether these cells can be incorporated in early safety assessment

An effective protocol for pharmacological defatting of primary human hepatocytes which is non-toxic to cholangiocytes or intrahepatic endothelial cells.

INTRODUCTION Pharmacological defatting of rat hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines suggests that the same method could be used to ameliorate macrovesicular steatosis in moderate to severely fatty livers. However there is no data assessing the effects of those drugs on primary human liver cells. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a pharmacological cocktail in reducing the in vitro lipid content of primary human hepatocytes (PHH). In addition we sought to determine the cytotoxicity of the cocktail towards non-parenchymal liver cells. METHODS Steatosis was induced in PHH by supplementation with a combination of saturated and unsaturated free fatty acids. This was followed by addition of a defatting drug cocktail for up to 48 hours. The same experimental method was used with human intra-hepatic endothelial cells (HIEC) and human cholangiocytes. MTT assay was used to assess cell viability, triglyceride quantification and oil red O staining were used to determine intracellular lipids content whilst ketone bodies were measured in the supernatants following experimentation. RESULTS Incubation of fat loaded PHH with the drugs over 48 hours reduced the intracellular lipid area by 54%, from 12.85% to 5.99% (p = 0.002) (percentage of total oil red O area), and intracellular triglyceride by 35%, from 28.24 to 18.30 nmol/million of cells (p<0.001). Total supernatant ketone bodies increased 1.4-fold over 48 hours in the defatted PHH compared with vehicle controls (p = 0.002). Moreover incubation with the drugs for 48 hours increased the viability of PHH by 11%, cholangiocytes by 25% whilst having no cytotoxic effects on HIEC. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate that pharmacological intervention can significantly decrease intracellular lipid content of PHH, increase fatty acids β-oxidation whilst being non-toxic to PHH, HIEC or cholangiocytes