A review of implant provision for hypodontia patients within a Scottish referral centre

Background: Implant treatment to replace congenitally missing teeth often involves multidisciplinary input in a secondary care environment. High quality patient care requires an in-depth knowledge of treatment requirements. Aim: This service review aimed to determine treatment needs, efficiency of service and outcomes achieved in hypodontia patients. It also aimed to determine any specific difficulties encountered in service provision, and suggest methods to overcome these. Methods: Hypodontia patients in the Unit of Periodontics of the Scottish referral centre under consideration, who had implant placement and fixed restoration, or review completed over a 31 month period, were included. A standardised data collection form was developed and completed with reference to the patient's clinical record. Information was collected with regard to: the indication for implant treatment and its extent; the need for, complexity and duration of orthodontic treatment; the need for bone grafting and the techniques employed and indicators of implant success. Conclusion: Implant survival and success rates were high for those patients reviewed. Incidence of biological complications compared very favourably with the literature

Influence of the fixed implant-supported provisional phase on the esthetic final outcome of implant-supported crowns: 3-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the use of a provisional implant-supported crown improves the final esthetic outcome of implant crowns that are placed within esthetic sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty endosseous implants were inserted in sites 13 to 23 (FDI) in 20 patients. Following the reopening procedure, a randomization process assigned them to either cohort group 1: a provisional phase with soft tissue conditioning using the "dynamic compression technique" or cohort group 2: without a provisional phase. Screw-retained all ceramic crowns were inserted. Clinical follow-up appointments were completed at 36 months evaluating clinical, radiographic outcomes, and implant success and survival. RESULTS After 3 years, all implants survived; one implant-supported crown was excluded from the study due to adjacent tooth failure replaced with a further implant supported crown. Modified pink esthetic score (ModPES) scores were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (P = .018); white esthetic scores (WES) were not statistically different between both groups (P = .194). Mean values of combined modPES and WES were 15.6 for group 1, with a SD of 3.20. Group 2 had a mean combined modPES and WES of 12.2, with a SD of 3.86. Mean bone loss after 3 year was -0.05 and -0.04 mm for groups 1 and 2 respectively, without being statistically significant. CONCLUSION Fixed implant-supported provisionals improve the final esthetic outcome of the peri-implant mucosa