Scalable solution for delivery of diabetes self-management education in Thailand (DSME-T): a cluster randomised trial study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is among the foremost health challenges facing policy makers in Thailand as its prevalence has more than tripled over the last two decades, accounting for considerable death, disability and healthcare expenditure. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) programmes show promise in improving diabetes outcomes, but this is not routinely used in Thailand. This study aims to test a culturally tailored DSME model in Thailand, using a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial comparing a nurse-led model, a peer-assisted model and standard care. We will test which model is effective and cost effective to improve cardiovascular risk and control of blood glucose among people with diabetes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 21 primary care units in northern Thailand will be randomised to one of three interventions, enrolling a total of 693 patients. The primary care units will be randomised (1:1:1) to participate in a culturally-tailored DSME intervention for 12 months. The three-arm trial design will compare effectiveness of nurse-led, peer-assisted (Thai village health volunteers) and standard care. The primary trial outcomes are changes in haemoglobin A1c and cardiovascular risk score. A process evaluation and cost effectiveness evaluation will be conducted to produce policy relevant guidance for the Thai Ministry of Public Health. The planned trial period will start in January 2020 and finish October 2021. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from Thailand and the UK. We will share our study data with other researchers, advertising via our publications and web presence. In particular, we are committed to sharing our findings and data with academic audiences in Thailand and other low-income and middle-income countries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03938233

Illness perceptions, self-care practices, and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is a fundamental aspect of diabetes care, but no standard program exists in Thailand. Understanding current patterns of illness perceptions (concerns) and self-management practices among patients with diabetes in Thailand is vital to develop culturally tailored DSME programs. This study sought to explore the association between reported self-management practices and diabetes perceptions on glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Specifically, the study examined whether the association between illness perceptions and diabetes control was mediated by self-management. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among type 2 diabetes patients on outpatient care and follow-up in four districts hospitals in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Illness perceptions was measured by the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ). Self-management practices were measured by Summary Diabetes Self-Care activities (SDSCA). For illness perceptions and self-management practices, patients were classified into two groups, high level and low level based on the median values. Univariate and multivariable analyses were done to determine the association between the determinant factors: self-care practices and illness perceptions and the outcome of interest- good glycemic control (HbA1c < 7%). RESULTS: Of the 200 participants recruited into the study, 180 completed the questionnaire. Only 35% of participants had good glycemic control (HBA1c < 7.0). Both illness perceptions and self-management practices were independently linked to glycemic control. Among illness perceptions, a sense of personal control was strongly associated with good glycemic control (p = 0.01). For self-management, appropriate diet (p = 0.03) and medication adherence (p = 0.05) were associated with good glycemic control. After adjustments for key baseline characteristics, patients with high levels of illness perceptions were less likely to achieve glycemic control (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14, p = 0.11) and those with high level of self-management were more likely to achieve glycemic control (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.30, p = 0.04). The effect size for illness perception attenuated when further adjusted for levels of self-management (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.96, p = 0.75) while the effect size for self-management and glycemic control did not materially change (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.02, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Illness perceptions and self-management practices are associated with glycemic control. Future culturally tailored interventions in Thailand aimed at improving glycemic should focus on personal control, improving diet and treatment adherence as these are more likely to help improve diabetes control as demonstrated in this study

Process evaluation protocol of a cluster randomised trial for a scalable solution for delivery of Diabetes Self-Management Education in Thailand (DSME-T).

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major global challenge, including for Thai policy-makers, as an estimated 4 million people in Thailand (population 68 million) have this condition. Premature death and disability due to diabetes are primarily due to complications which can be prevented by good risk factor control. Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) programmes provide patients with diabetes with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage their disease. Currently, a trial is being conducted in Thailand to evaluate the effectiveness, defined as HbA1c<7 at 12 months after enrolment, of a culturally tailored DSME in Thailand. A process evaluation can provide further interpretation of the results from complex interventions as well as insight into the success of applying the programme into a broader context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aim of the process evaluation is to understand how and why the intervention was effective or ineffective and to identify contextually relevant strategies for future successful implementation. For the process evaluation, the design will be a mixed-method study collecting data from nurse providers, and village health volunteers (community health workers) as well as patients. This will be conducted using observations, interviews and focus groups from the three purposively selected groups at the beginning and end of trial. Quantitative data will be collected through surveys conducted at the beginning, during 6-month follow-up, and at the end of trial. The mixed-methods analysis will be triangulated to assess differences and similarities across the various data sources. The overall effectiveness of the intervention will be examined using multilevel analysis of repeated measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study approved by the Chiang Mai University Research Ethics Committee (326/2018) and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (16113/RR/12850). Results will be published in open access, peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03938233