67 research outputs found

    Ion trapping in rotating superfluid liquid helium under pressure

    Get PDF

    Perpendicular-current Studies of Electron Transport Across Metal/Metal Interfaces

    Full text link
    We review what we have learned about the scattering of electrons by the interfaces between two different metals (M1/M2) in the current-perpendicular-to-plane (CPP) geometry. In this geometry, the intrinsic quantity is the specific resistance, AR, the product of the area through which the CPP current flows times the CPP resistance. We describe results for both non-magnetic/non-magnetic (N1/N2) and ferromagnetic/non-magnetic (F/N) pairs. We focus especially upon cases where M1/M2 are lattice matched (i.e., have the same crystal structure and the same lattice parameters to within ~ 1%), because in these cases no-free-parameter calculations of 2AR agree surprisingly well with measured values. But we also list and briefly discuss cases where M1/M2 are not lattice matched, either having different crystal structures, or lattice parameters that differ by several percent. The published calculations of 2AR in these latter cases do not agree so well with measured values.Comment: 6 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. In Press: Applied Surface Scienc

    Current induced switching of magnetic domains to a perpendicular configuration

    Full text link
    In a ferromagnet--normal-metal--ferromagnet trilayer, a current flowing perpendicularly to the layers creates a torque on the magnetic moments of the ferromagnets. When one of the contacts is superconducting, the torque not only favors parallel or antiparallel alignment of the magnetic moments, as is the case for two normal contacts, but can also favor a configuration where the two moments are perpendicular. In addition, whereas the conductance for parallel and antiparallel magnetic moments is the same, signalling the absence of giant magnetoresistance in the usual sense, the conductance is greater in the perpendicular configuration. Thus, a negative magnetoconductance is predicted, in contrast with the usual giant magnetoresistance.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures, major rewriting of the technical par

    Current-Driven Magnetization Dynamics in Magnetic Multilayers

    Full text link
    We develop a quantum analog of the classical spin-torque model for current-driven magnetic dynamics. The current-driven magnetic excitation at finite field becomes significantly incoherent. This excitation is described by an effective magnetic temperature rather than a coherent precession as in the spin-torque model. However, both the spin-torque and effective temperature approximations give qualitatively similar switching diagrams in the current-field coordinates, showing the need for detailed experiments to establish the proper physical model for current-driven dynamics.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figure

    Giant magnetothermopower of magnon-assisted transport in ferromagnetic tunnel junctions

    Full text link
    We present a theoretical description of the thermopower due to magnon-assisted tunneling in a mesoscopic tunnel junction between two ferromagnetic metals. The thermopower is generated in the course of thermal equilibration between two baths of magnons, mediated by electrons. For a junction between two ferromagnets with antiparallel polarizations, the ability of magnon-assisted tunneling to create thermopower SAPS_{AP} depends on the difference between the size Π,\Pi_{\uparrow, \downarrow} of the majority and minority band Fermi surfaces and it is proportional to a temperature dependent factor (kBT/ωD)3/2(k_{B}T/\omega_{D})^{3/2} where ωD\omega_{D} is the magnon Debye energy. The latter factor reflects the fractional change in the net magnetization of the reservoirs due to thermal magnons at temperature TT (Bloch's T3/2T^{3/2} law). In contrast, the contribution of magnon-assisted tunneling to the thermopower SPS_P of a junction with parallel polarizations is negligible. As the relative polarizations of ferromagnetic layers can be manipulated by an external magnetic field, a large difference ΔS=SAPSPSAP(kB/e)f(Π,Π)(kBT/ωD)3/2\Delta S = S_{AP} - S_P \approx S_{AP} \sim - (k_B/e) f (\Pi_{\uparrow},\Pi_{\downarrow}) (k_BT/\omega_{D})^{3/2} results in a magnetothermopower effect. This magnetothermopower effect becomes giant in the extreme case of a junction between two half-metallic ferromagnets, ΔSkB/e\Delta S \sim - k_B/e.Comment: 9 pages, 4 eps figure

    Particles-vortex interactions and flow visualization in He4

    Full text link
    Recent experiments have demonstrated a remarkable progress in implementing and use of the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking techniques for the study of turbulence in He4. However, an interpretation of the experimental data in the superfluid phase requires understanding how the motion of tracer particles is affected by the two components, the viscous normal fluid and the inviscid superfluid. Of a particular importance is the problem of particle interactions with quantized vortex lines which may not only strongly affect the particle motion, but, under certain conditions, may even trap particles on quantized vortex cores. The article reviews recent theoretical, numerical, and experimental results in this rapidly developing area of research, putting critically together recent results, and solving apparent inconsistencies. Also discussed is a closely related technique of detection of quantized vortices negative ion bubbles in He4.Comment: To appear in the J Low Temperature Physic

    Oscillatory interlayer exchange and magnetoresistance in Fe/Cu multilayers

    Get PDF
    We have studied the magnetic and magnetotransport properties of Fe/Cu mu1tilayers prepared by sputtering. We find oscillations of the inter1ayer coupling as a function of the Cu thickness with the same long period as in Co/Cu multilayers (around 12.5 Á). The most striking result is that the oscillations in Fe/Cu and Co/Cu have almost exactly opposite phases. A large magnetoresistance of the spin-valve type is observed in the half periods with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange. However, the magnetoresistance in Fe/Cu is definitely smaller than in Co/Cu
    corecore