The conductivity measure for the Anderson model

We study the ac-conductivity in linear response theory for the Anderson tight-binding model. We define the electrical ac-conductivity and calculate the linear-response current at zero temperature for arbitrary Fermi energy. In particular, the Fermi energy may lie in a spectral region where extended states are believed to exist

A block Hankel generalized confluent Vandermonde matrix

Vandermonde matrices are well known. They have a number of interesting properties and play a role in (Lagrange) interpolation problems, partial fraction expansions, and finding solutions to linear ordinary differential equations, to mention just a few applications. Usually, one takes these matrices square, $q\times q$ say, in which case the $i$-th column is given by $u(z_i)$, where we write $u(z)=(1,z,...,z^{q-1})^\top$. If all the $z_i$ ($i=1,...,q$) are different, the Vandermonde matrix is non-singular, otherwise not. The latter case obviously takes place when all $z_i$ are the same, $z$ say, in which case one could speak of a confluent Vandermonde matrix. Non-singularity is obtained if one considers the matrix $V(z)$ whose $i$-th column ($i=1,...,q$) is given by the $(i-1)$-th derivative $u^{(i-1)}(z)^\top$. We will consider generalizations of the confluent Vandermonde matrix $V(z)$ by considering matrices obtained by using as building blocks the matrices $M(z)=u(z)w(z)$, with $u(z)$ as above and $w(z)=(1,z,...,z^{r-1})$, together with its derivatives $M^{(k)}(z)$. Specifically, we will look at matrices whose $ij$-th block is given by $M^{(i+j)}(z)$, where the indices $i,j$ by convention have initial value zero. These in general non-square matrices exhibit a block-Hankel structure. We will answer a number of elementary questions for this matrix. What is the rank? What is the null-space? Can the latter be parametrized in a simple way? Does it depend on $z$? What are left or right inverses? It turns out that answers can be obtained by factorizing the matrix into a product of other matrix polynomials having a simple structure. The answers depend on the size of the matrix $M(z)$ and the number of derivatives $M^{(k)}(z)$ that is involved. The results are obtained by mostly elementary methods, no specific knowledge of the theory of matrix polynomials is needed

Were the Acquisitive Conglomerates Inefficient?

This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that the 1960s conglomerates were inefficient. I offer valuation results consistent with recent event-study evidence that markets typically rewarded diversifying acquisitions. Using new data, I compute industry-adjusted valuation, profitability, leverage, and investment ratios for thirty-six large, acquisitive conglomerates from 1966 to 1974. During the early 1970s, the conglomerates were less valuable and less profitable than standalone firms, favoring an agency explanation for unrelated diversification. In the 1960s, however, conglomerates were not valued at a discount. Evidence from acquisition histories suggests that conglomerate diversification may have added value by creating internal capital markets.diversification, mergers and acquisitions, conglomerates, restructuring