67 research outputs found
Approximation of quadratic irrationals and their pierce expansions
In this article two aims are pursued: on the one hand, to present a rapidly converging algorithm for the approximation of square roots; on the other hand and based on the previous algorithm, to find the Pierce expansions of a certain class of quadratic irrationals as an alternative way to the method presented in 1984 by J.O. Shallit; we extend the method to find also the Pierce expansions of quadratic irrationals of the form which are not covered in Shallit's work.Quadratic irrationals, Pierce series
A total order in [0,1] defined through a 'next' operator
A `next' operator, s, is built on the set R1=(0,1]-{ 1-1/e} defining a partial order that, with the help of the axiom of choice, can be extended to a total order in R1. Besides, the orbits {sn(a)}n are all dense in R1 and are constituted by elements of the same arithmetical character: if a is an algebraic irrational of degree k all the elements in a's orbit are algebraic of degree k; if a is transcendental, all are transcendental. Moreover, the asymptotic distribution function of the sequence formed by the elements in any of the half-orbits is a continuous, strictly increasing, singular function very similar to the well-known Minkowski's ?(Ă) function.Total orders, pierce series, singular functions
A singular function and its relation with the number systems involved in its definition
Minkowski's ?(x) function can be seen as the confrontation of two number systems: regular continued fractions and the alternated dyadic system. This way of looking at it permits us to prove that its derivative, as it also happens for many other non-decreasing singular functions from [0,1] to [0,1], when it exists can only attain two values: zero and infinity. It is also proved that if the average of the partial quotients in the continued fraction expansion of x is greater than k* =5.31972, and ?'(x) exists then ?'(x)=0. In the same way, if the same average is less than k**=2 log2(F), where F is the golden ratio, then ?'(x)=infinity. Finally some results are presented concerning metric properties of continued fraction and alternated dyadic expansions.Singular function, number systems, metric number theory
Fermat's treatise on quadrature: A new reading
The Treatise on Quadrature of Fermat (c. 1659), besides containing the first known proof of the computation of the area under a higher parabola, R x+m/n dx, or under a higher hyperbola, R x-m/n dxâ with the appropriate limits of integration in each caseâ, has a second part which was not understood by Fermatâs contemporaries. This second part of the Treatise is obscure and difficult to read and even the great Huygens described it as 'published with many mistakes and it is so obscure (with proofs redolent of error) that I have been unable to make any sense of it'. Far from the confusion that Huygens attributes to it, in this paper we try to prove that Fermat, in writing the Treatise, had a very clear goal in mind and he managed to attain it by means of a simple and original method. Fermat reduced the quadrature of a great number of algebraic curves to the quadrature of known curves: the higher parabolas and hyperbolas of the first part of the paper. Others, he reduced to the quadrature of the circle. We shall see how the clever use of two procedures, quite novel at the time: the change of variables and a particular case of the formula of integration by parts, provide Fermat with the necessary tools to square very easily curves as well-known as the folium of Descartes, the cissoid of Diocles or the witch of Agnesi.History of mathematics, quadratures, integration methods
On the concept of optimality interval
The approximants to regular continued fractions constitute `best approximations' to the numbers they converge to in two ways known as of the first and the second kind. This property of continued fractions provides a solution to Gosper's problem of the batting average: if the batting average of a baseball player is 0.334, what is the minimum number of times he has been at bat? In this paper, we tackle somehow the inverse question: given a rational number P/Q, what is the set of all numbers for which P/Q is a `best approximation' of one or the other kind? We prove that in both cases these `Optimality Sets' are intervals and we give a precise description of their endpoints.Diofantine approximations, continued fractions, metric theory
A mathematical excursion: From the three-door problem to a Cantor-type perfect set
We start with a generalization of the well-known three-door problem: the n-door problem. The solution of this new problem leads us to a beautiful representation system for real numbers in (0,1] as alternated series, known in the literature as Pierce expansions. A closer look to Pierce expansions will take us to some metrical properties of sets defined through the Pierce expansions of its elements. Finally, these metrical properties will enable us to present 'strange' sets, similar to the classical Cantor set.Pierce expansions, cantor-type sets
Sobre una sèrie de Goldbach i Euler
El teorema 1 de l'article d'Euler ÂŤVariae observationes circa series infinitasÂť,
publicat el 1737, enuncia un resultat sorprenent: la sèrie dels recĂprocs de les potències
enteres menys la unitat tĂŠ suma 1. Euler atribueix el teorema a Goldbach. La
demostraciĂł que ofereix ĂŠs un dels exemples Âtan freqĂźents als segles xvii i xviiiÂ
de mal ús d'una sèrie divergent que acaba produint un resultat correcte. Examinem
amb detall la demostraciĂł d'Euler i, amb l'ajut de les intuĂŻcions que ens proporciona
una demostraciĂł moderna (i totalment diferent), presentem una reconstrucciĂł racional
en termes que es podrien considerar rigorosos per als estĂ ndards weierstrassians
moderns. Al mateix temps, amb l'ajut d'algunes idees de l'anĂ lisi no estĂ ndard, veiem
com la mateixa reconstrucciĂł tambĂŠ es pot considerar correcta per als estĂ ndards
robinsonians moderns. Aquest últim enfocament, però, s'adiu completament amb la
demostració d'Euler i de Goldbach. Esperem, doncs, convèncer el lector de com unes
poques idees d'anĂ lisi no estĂ ndard sĂłn suficients per reivindicar el treball d'Euler.Theorem 1 of EulerÂs paper of 1737 ÂŤVariae observationes circa series unfinitas
Âť, states the astonishing result that the series of all unit fractions whose
denominators are perfect powers of integers minus unity has sum 1. Euler
attributes the theorem to Goldbach. The proof is one of those examples of
misuse of divergent series to obtain correct results so frequent during the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. We examine this proof closely and, with
the help of some insight provided by a modern (and completely different) proof
of the Goldbach-Euler Theorem, we present a rational reconstruction in terms
which could be considered rigorous by modern weierstrassian standards. At
the same time, with a few ideas borrowed from nonstandard analysis we see
how the same reconstruction can be also be considered rigorous by modern
robinsonian standards. This last approach, though, is completely in tune with
Goldbach and EulerÂs proof. We hope to convince the reader then how a few
simple ideas from nonstandard analysis vindicate EulerÂs work
El mètode de quadratures de Fermat
El Tractat de quadratures de Fermat (c. 1659) Ês conegut perquè contÊ la
primera demostració de la qual hom tÊ constà ncia del còmput de l'à rea sota una
parĂ bola superior, , o una hipèrbola superior, Âamb els lĂmits d'integraciĂł adequats a cada cas. Però tambĂŠ contĂŠ una segona part que va ser gairebĂŠ
ignorada pels seus contemporanis. Aquesta part ĂŠs força obscura i difĂcil de llegir. En
aquesta part, Fermat redueix la quadratura d'un gran nombre de corbes algebraiques a
la quadratura de corbes conegudes: les parà boles i hipèrboles de la primera part.
En altres casos, aconsegueix la reducciĂł a la quadratura del cercle. En aquest article
s'examina el mètode de quadratures de Fermat, que combina de manera molt intel¡ligent
dos procediments innovadors a l' època: el canvi de variables i un cas particular de
la integració per parts. Amb el seu mètode, Fermat aconsegueix quadrar corbes tan
conegudes com el foli de Descartes, la cissoide de Diocles o la bruixa d'Agnesi.FermatÂs Method of Quadrature. The Treatise on Quadrature of Fermat (c. 1659), besides containing the first
known proof of the computation of the area under a higher parabola, ,
or under a higher hyperbola,
 with the appropriate limits of integration
in each case  has a second part which was mostly unnoticed by
FermatÂs contemporaries. This second part of the Treatise is obscure and difficult
to read. In it Fermat reduced the quadrature of a great number of algebraic
curves to the quadrature of known curves: the higher parabolas and hyperbolas
of the first part of the paper. Others, he reduced to the quadrature of the circle.
We shall see how the clever use of two procedures, quite novel at the time:
the change of variables and a particular case of the formula of integration by
parts, provide Fermat with the necessary tools to square  quite easily  as
well-known curves as the folium of Descartes, the cissoid of Diocles or the
witch of Agnesi
- âŚ