Unsettled territory

In a surreal manner, my work tests the burgeoning notion of art as life and life as art. Artistic effort to be more real than reality has a long tradition, but it is beginning with Marcel Duchamp that the particular turn of mind which fascinates me becomes evident in art. The overwhelming doubt in regard to the finality of a proposition is the motivation for my representation of experience. In my work there is a focus on seemingly commonplace events, objects, and forms whose significance has been enhanced in an ambiguous statement. In a new context specific objects and materials function in relationships foreign to their identity. A certain credibility in this new identity makes them psychologically provocative. My use of objects reflects the influence of Jasper Johns, Robert Rauchenberg, and Rene Magrite. They used objects in an overtly confrontational manner. In my work there is a reserved atmosphere where the confrontation is denied. The impermanent, unprecious nature of the materials is a part of the fast changing, disposable attitude in my modem society. The imposing presence of the work contradicts impermanence, and this creates a paradox by presenting miscellaneous objects in a precious manner. Feelings of static confinement are tempered by unresolved spontaneity. These opposing qualities are subtle and achieve a form of coexistence. In content the use of human manipulation echos man's mimicry of natural order. Levels of order reflect my personal beliefs about their psychological functioning. I propose an ordered atmosphere of reserved human normalcy where tensions and contradictions arise, build, and expire

Canyon

Art history paper.1985 Spring.Includes bibliographic references (page 15)

A brain-targeted teaching framework: modeling the intended change in professional development to increase knowledge of learning sciences research and influence pedagogical change in K-12 public classrooms

Research in the learning sciences continues to evolve with ongoing technological advancements that allow for a deeper understanding of brain function. Studies of brain activity are being used to explore, classify, and explain learning processes. The benefits of such research can serve to inform and guide education in ways previously not possible. However, disconnectedness between science and education creates a barrier to the improvement of pedagogy. Educators' lack of knowledge and understanding of brain-based research and its implications can stifle the necessary evolution of learning in the classroom. The purpose of this explanatory sequential mixed methods study was to explore the integration of the Brain-targeted Teaching (BTT) Model in professional development for educators and to examine the subsequent transference and pedagogical influence in the classroom. Data collection methods included a pre-session and immediate post-session survey, as well as a follow up delayed post-session survey and semi-structured interviews 4-6 weeks after the learning session. Forty-four K-12 public school educators participated in the study. Analysis of data yielded three major findings substantiated by sub-findings. The study suggested an increase in educator awareness and knowledge of BBL and BTT concepts as well as an increase in application of BTT strategies in the classroom. The keys findings and results emphasized the need for a deeper partnership between the science of learning and practical experiences in the classroom. The convergence of science and education is a necessary partnership as learning sciences research continues to expand and inform the design of instruction.Ed.D., Educational Leadership and Management -- Drexel University, 201

Archaeobotany in Australia and New Guinea: practice, potential and prospects

Archaeobotany is the study of plant remains from archaeological contexts. Despite Australasian research being at the forefront of several methodological innovations over the last three decades, archaebotany is now a relatively peripheral concern to most archaeological projects in Australia and New Guinea. In this paper, many practicing archaeobotanists working in these regions argue for a more central role for archaeobotany in standard archaeological practice. An overview of archaeobotanical techniques and applications is presented, the potential for archaeobotany to address key historical research questions is indicated, and initiatives designed to promote archaeobotany and improve current practices are outlined

Archaeobotany in Australia and New Guinea: practice, potential and prospects

Archaeobotany is the study of plant remains from archaeological contexts. Despite Australasian research being at the forefront of several methodological innovations over the last three decades, archaebotany is now a relatively peripheral concern to most archaeological projects in Australia and New Guinea. In this paper, many practicing archaeobotanists working in these regions argue for a more central role for archaeobotany in standard archaeological practice. An overview of archaeobotanical techniques and applications is presented, the potential for archaeobotany to address key historical research questions is indicated, and initiatives designed to promote archaeobotany and improve current practices are outlined

Bi-allelic Loss-of-Function CACNA1B Mutations in Progressive Epilepsy-Dyskinesia.

The occurrence of non-epileptic hyperkinetic movements in the context of developmental epileptic encephalopathies is an increasingly recognized phenomenon. Identification of causative mutations provides an important insight into common pathogenic mechanisms that cause both seizures and abnormal motor control. We report bi-allelic loss-of-function CACNA1B variants in six children from three unrelated families whose affected members present with a complex and progressive neurological syndrome. All affected individuals presented with epileptic encephalopathy, severe neurodevelopmental delay (often with regression), and a hyperkinetic movement disorder. Additional neurological features included postnatal microcephaly and hypotonia. Five children died in childhood or adolescence (mean age of death: 9 years), mainly as a result of secondary respiratory complications. CACNA1B encodes the pore-forming subunit of the pre-synaptic neuronal voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.2/N-type, crucial for SNARE-mediated neurotransmission, particularly in the early postnatal period. Bi-allelic loss-of-function variants in CACNA1B are predicted to cause disruption of Ca2+ influx, leading to impaired synaptic neurotransmission. The resultant effect on neuronal function is likely to be important in the development of involuntary movements and epilepsy. Overall, our findings provide further evidence for the key role of Cav2.2 in normal human neurodevelopment.MAK is funded by an NIHR Research Professorship and receives funding from the Wellcome Trust, Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital Charity, and Rosetrees Trust. E.M. received funding from the Rosetrees Trust (CD-A53) and Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity. K.G. received funding from Temple Street Foundation. A.M. is funded by Great Ormond Street Hospital, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), and Biomedical Research Centre. F.L.R. and D.G. are funded by Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. K.C. and A.S.J. are funded by NIHR Bioresource for Rare Diseases. The DDD Study presents independent research commissioned by the Health Innovation Challenge Fund (grant number HICF-1009-003), a parallel funding partnership between the Wellcome Trust and the Department of Health, and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (grant number WT098051). We acknowledge support from the UK Department of Health via the NIHR comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London. This research was also supported by the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. J.H.C. is in receipt of an NIHR Senior Investigator Award. The research team acknowledges the support of the NIHR through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, Department of Health, or Wellcome Trust. E.R.M. acknowledges support from NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, an NIHR Senior Investigator Award, and the University of Cambridge has received salary support in respect of E.R.M. from the NHS in the East of England through the Clinical Academic Reserve. I.E.S. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Program Grant and Practitioner Fellowship)

Gaudi: a discussion of the sculptural and aesthetic qualities of his work

Concentration research paper.1983 Spring.Includes bibliographic references

Meta-analysis of Cognitive Function Following Non-severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection

To effectively diagnose and treat subjective cognitive symptoms in post-acute sequalae of COVID-19 (PASC), it is important to understand objective cognitive impairment across the range of acute COVID-19 severity. Despite the importance of this area of research, to our knowledge, there are no current meta-analyses of objective cognitive functioning following non-severe initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this meta-analysis is to describe objective cognitive impairment in individuals with non-severe (mild or moderate) SARS-CoV-2 cases in the post-acute stage of infection. This meta-analysis was pre-registered with Prospero (CRD42021293124) and utilized the PRISMA checklist for reporting guidelines, with screening conducted by at least two independent reviewers for all aspects of the screening and data extraction process. Fifty-nine articles (total participants = 22,060) with three types of study designs met our full criteria. Individuals with non-severe (mild/moderate) initial SARS-CoV-2 infection demonstrated worse objective cognitive performance compared to healthy comparison participants. However, those with mild (nonhospitalized) initial SARS-CoV-2 infections had better objective cognitive performance than those with moderate (hospitalized but not requiring ICU care) or severe (hospitalized with ICU care) initial SARS-CoV-2 infections. For studies that used normative data comparisons instead of healthy comparison participants, there was a small and nearly significant effect when compared to normative data. There were high levels of heterogeneity (88.6 to 97.3%), likely reflecting small sample sizes and variations in primary study methodology. Individuals who have recovered from non-severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections may be at risk for cognitive decline or impairment and may benefit from cognitive health interventions