17 research outputs found

    Comparison of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the COVID-19 pandemic with those before the pandemic: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, directly and indirectly, affected the emergency medical care system and resulted in worse out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes and epidemiological features compared with those before the pandemic. This review compares the regional and temporal features of OHCA prognosis and epidemiological characteristics. Various databases were searched to compare the OHCA outcomes and epidemiological characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic with before the pandemic. During the COVID-19 pandemic, survival and favorable neurological outcome rates were significantly lower than before. Survival to hospitalization, return of spontaneous circulation, endotracheal intubation, and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) decreased significantly, whereas the use of a supraglottic airway device, the incidence of cardiac arrest at home, and response time of emergency medical service (EMS) increased significantly. Bystander CPR, unwitnessed cardiac arrest, EMS transfer time, use of mechanical CPR, and in-hospital target temperature management did not differ significantly. A subgroup analysis of the studies that included only the first wave with those that included the subsequent waves revealed the overall outcomes in which the epidemiological features of OHCA exhibited similar patterns. No significant regional differences between the OHCA survival rates in Asia before and during the pandemic were observed, although other variables varied by region. The COVID-19 pandemic altered the epidemiologic characteristics, survival rates, and neurological prognosis of OHCA patients.Review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022339435)

    Impact of scannable healing abutment type on implant impression accuracy

    No full text
    Aim or Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the impact of scannable healing abutment shape and height on the accuracy of implant impression. Materials and Methods: IS III active (Neobiotech Co., Seoul, Korea), TS III (Osstem Implant Co., Seoul, Korea), and Bright tissue level (Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea) were installed in the mandibular right second premolar and first molar areas of each 3d-printed partially edentulous mandibular model. With scanbodies and scannable healing abutments connected, reference STL files were generated by the model scanner (inEos X5, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) and 10 STL files of each model were generated with the intraoral scanner (PRIMESCAN®, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). By using exocad DentalCAD (exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), STL files were aligned on the coordinate system and digital laboratory analogues were matched to each STL file. The deviation of the angle between the long axes of fixtures and the reference plane and the 3d-distance deviation of the fixture tops' centers were measured using the Geomagic® Control X (3D Systems Inc., Rock Hill, SC, USA). Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test and Bonferroni correction were used for statistical analysis. Results: Scannable healing abutments of the three companies showed comparable 3d-distance and angular deviation, although there were some differences depending on the location. Adding a plastic cap on the scannable healing abutment of Bright implant significantly increased the angular deviation, while the 3d-distance deviation was significantly decreased. Conclusions: In the limitation of this study, scannable healing abutment shape did not affect the implant impression accuracy while adding a cap increased the angular deviation
    corecore