A Simple Numerical Tool for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction Analyses Including Non-Linear Behaviour of Both Structure and Foundation

In this paper a simple model to take into account dynamic non-linear soil-structure interaction is presented: it consists of a 1 degree-of-freedom (dof) superstructure and a 3 dof macro-element foundation. Both the superstructure and the soil-foundation system exhibit a non-linear behaviour. In particular the superstructure is characterized by an elastic perfectly plastic behaviour, while the foundation macro-element encompasses the two sources of non-linearity that arise in the soil-foundation interface: a) the one due to the irreversible elastoplastic soil behaviour (material non-linearity) and b) the one due to possible foundation uplift (geometric non-linearity). The global model thus entails the following features: a) the coupling between the foundation and the superstructure when one or both of them enter into the non-linear range, b) the capability for the foundation and the superstructure to dissipate energy, c) a prediction of peak and residual displacements in both the superstructure and the foundation, d) the possibility to model the isolation effects for the structure due to the foundation non-linear behaviour and e) the possibility for the superstructure to reach a particular level of ductility demand. Therefore, the model can serve as a numerical tool for assessing performance-based design approaches that wish to take into account non-linear soil-structure interaction. This is illustrated through several case studies of bridge piers, in which a comparison between the results obtained by dynamic analyses performed with different base conditions (fixed base, elastic base, elastoplastic base with uplift) emphasizes the role of the non-linear soil-structure interaction in design

Perception of trunk appearance and body self in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: The significance of brace treatment

n/

The spectral element method as an effective tool for solving large scale dynamic soil-structure interaction problems

The spectral element method (SEM) is a powerful numerical technique naturally suited for wave propagation and dynamic soil-structure interaction (DSSI) analyses. A class of SEM has been widely used in the seismological field (local or global seismology) thanks to its capability of providing high accuracy and allowing the implementation of optimized parallel algorithms. We illustrate inthis contribution how the SEM can be effectively used also for the numerical analysis of DSSI problems, with reference to the 3D seismic response of a railway viaduct in Italy. This numerical analysis includes the combined effect of: a) strong lateral variations of soil properties; b) topographic amplification; c) DSSI; d) spatial variation of earthquake ground motion in the structural response. Some hints on the work in progress to effectively handle nonlinear problems with SEM are also given

Selection and spectral matching of recorded ground motions for seismic fragility analyses

Ground motion selection is one of the most important phases in the derivation of fragility curves through non-linear dynamic analyses. In this context, an easy-to-use software, namely S&M—Select & Match, has been adopted for the selection and spectral matching of recorded ground motions approaching a target response spectrum in a broad period range. In this paper, after a brief description of the key features of the S&M tool, two sets of 125 accelerograms, separately for stiff (i.e. site classes A and B according to the Italian code) and soft soil (i.e. site classes C and D) conditions, have been selected on the basis of the elastic design spectra of the Italian seismic code defined for different return periods. The selected ground motions have been analysed and used for non-linear dynamic analysis of a case study representative of a common Italian RC building type designed only to gravity loads. Results have been analysed in order to check the capability of the considered signals to adequately cover all the damage levels generally adopted in seismic risk analyses, as well as the effects on seismic response due to the selection criteria permitted by the proposed tool