Lateral forces on circularly polarizable particles near a surface

Optical forces allow manipulation of small particles and control of nanophotonic structures with light beams. While some techniques rely on structured light to move particles using field intensity gradients, acting locally, other optical forces can push particles on a wide area of illumination but only in the direction of light propagation. Here we show that spin orbit coupling, when the spin of the incident circularly polarized light is converted into lateral electromagnetic momentum, leads to a lateral optical force acting on particles placed above a substrate, associated with a recoil mechanical force. This counterintuitive force acts in a direction in which the illumination has neither a field gradient nor propagation. The force direction is switchable with the polarization of uniform, plane wave illumination, and its magnitude is comparable to other optical forces.This work has been supported, in part, by EPSRC (UK). A.V.Z. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and the Wolfson Foundation. N.E. acknowledges partial support from the US Office of Naval Research Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative Grant No. N00014-10-1-0942. A.M. acknowledges support from the Spanish Government (contract Nos TEC2011-28664-C02-02 and TEC2014-51902-C2-1-R).Rodríguez Fortuño, FJ.; Engheta, N.; Martínez Abietar, AJ.; Zayats, AV. (2015). Lateral forces on circularly polarizable particles near a surface. Nature Communications. 6(8799):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9799S1768799Novotny, L. & Hecht, B. Principles of Nano-Optics Cambridge University Press (2011).Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics Wiley (1998).Ashkin, A. & Dziedzic, J. M. Optical levitation by radiation pressure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 19, 283 (1971).Ashkin, A. Acceleration and trapping of particles by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156–159 (1970).Omori, R., Kobayashi, T. & Suzuki, A. Observation of a single-beam gradient-force optical trap for dielectric particles in air. Opt. Lett. 22, 816–818 (1997).Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. E. & Chu, S. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986).Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M. & Yamane, T. Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams. Nature 330, 769–771 (1987).Bagnato, V. S. et al. Continuous stopping and trapping of neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2194–2197 (1987).Phillips, W. D. Nobel lecture: laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 721–741 (1998).Wang, M. M. et al. Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 83–87 (2005).Dholakia, K. & Čižmár, T. Shaping the future of manipulation. Nat. Photon. 5, 335–342 (2011).Zhao, R., Zhou, J., Koschny, T., Economou, E. N. & Soukoulis, C. M. Repulsive Casimir force in chiral metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 103602 (2009).Leonhardt, U. & Philbin, T. G. Quantum levitation by left-handed metamaterials. New J. Phys. 9, 254–254 (2007).Ginis, V., Tassin, P., Soukoulis, C. M. & Veretennicoff, I. Enhancing optical gradient forces with metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 057401 (2013).Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Vakil, A. & Engheta, N. Electric levitation using ɛ-near-zero metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 033902 (2014).Grier, D. G. A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 424, 810–816 (2003).Yang, X., Liu, Y., Oulton, R. F., Yin, X. & Zhang, X. Optical forces in hybrid plasmonic waveguides. Nano Lett. 11, 321–328 (2011).Oskooi, A., Favuzzi, P. A., Kawakami, Y. & Noda, S. Tailoring repulsive optical forces in nanophotonic waveguides. Opt. Lett. 36, 4638 (2011).Shalin, A. S., Ginzburg, P., Belov, P. A., Kivshar, Y. S. & Zayats, A. V. Nano-opto-mechanical effects in plasmonic waveguides. Laser Photon. Rev. 8, 131–136 (2014).Abajo, F. J. G., de, Brixner, T. & Pfeiffer, W. Nanoscale force manipulation in the vicinity of a metal nanostructure. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, S249–S258 (2007).Juan, M. L., Righini, M. & Quidant, R. Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nat. Photon. 5, 349–356 (2011).Beth, R. Mechanical detection and measurement of the angular momentum of light. Phys. Rev. 50, 115–125 (1936).Padgett, M. & Bowman, R. Tweezers with a twist. Nat. Photon. 5, 343–348 (2011).Liu, M., Zentgraf, T., Liu, Y., Bartal, G. & Zhang, X. Light-driven nanoscale plasmonic motors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 570–573 (2010).Marston, P. L. & Crichton, J. H. Radiation torque on a sphere caused by a circularly-polarized electromagnetic wave. Phys. Rev. A 30, 2508–2516 (1984).Sokolov, I. V. The angular momentum of an electromagnetic wave, the Sadovski effect, and the generation of magnetic fields in a plasma. Phys. Uspekhi 34, 925–932 (1991).Wang, S. B. & Chan, C. T. Lateral optical force on chiral particles near a surface. Nat. Commun. 5, 3307 (2014).Hayat, A., Müller, J. P. B. & Capasso, F. Lateral chirality-sorting optical forces. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516704112 (2015).Bliokh, K. Y., Bekshaev, A. Y. & Nori, F. Extraordinary momentum and spin in evanescent waves. Nat. Commun. 5, 3300 (2014).Antognozzi, M. et al. Direct measurement of the extraordinary optical momentum using a nano-cantilever. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04248 (2015).Bekshaev, A. Y., Bliokh, K. Y. & Nori, F. Transverse spin and momentum in two-wave interference. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011039 (2015).Bliokh, K. Y., Smirnova, D. & Nori, F. Quantum spin Hall effect of light. Science 348, 1448–1451 (2015).Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J. et al. Near-field interference for the unidirectional excitation of electromagnetic guided modes. Science 340, 328–330 (2013).Kapitanova, P. V. et al. Photonic spin Hall effect in hyperbolic metamaterials for polarization-controlled routing of subwavelength modes. Nat. Commun. 5, 3226 (2014).Bliokh, K. Y., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Nori, F. & Zayats, A. V. Spin-orbit interactions of light. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02864 (2015).O’Connor, D., Ginzburg, P., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Wurtz, G. A. & Zayats, A. V. Spin–orbit coupling in surface plasmon scattering by nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 5, 5327 (2014).Neugebauer, M., Bauer, T., Banzer, P. & Leuchs, G. Polarization tailored light driven directional optical nanobeacon. Nano Lett. 14, 2546–2551 (2014).Mueller, J. P. B. & Capasso, F. Asymmetric surface plasmon polariton emission by a dipole emitter near a metal surface. Phys. Rev. B 88, 121410 (2013).Xi, Z. et al. Controllable directive radiation of a circularly polarized dipole above planar metal surface. Opt. Express 21, 30327 (2013).Carbonell, J. et al. Directive excitation of guided electromagnetic waves through polarization control. Phys. Rev. B 89, 155121 (2014).Young, A. B. et al. Polarization engineering in photonic crystal waveguides for spin-photon entanglers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015).Mitsch, R., Sayrin, C., Albrecht, B., Schneeweiss, P. & Rauschenbeutel, A. Quantum state-controlled directional spontaneous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide. Nat. Commun. 5, 5713 (2014).Le Kien, F. & Rauschenbeutel, A. Anisotropy in scattering of light from an atom into the guided modes of a nanofiber. Phys. Rev. A 90, 023805 (2014).Luxmoore, I. J. et al. Interfacing spins in an InGaAs quantum dot to a semiconductor waveguide circuit using emitted photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 037402 (2013).Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J. et al. Universal method for the synthesis of arbitrary polarization states radiated by a nanoantenna. Laser Photon. Rev. 8, L27–L31 (2014).Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Barber-Sanz, I., Puerto, D., Griol, A. & Martinez, A. Resolving light handedness with an on-chip silicon microdisk. ACS Photon. 1, 762–767 (2014).Petersen, J., Volz, J. & Rauschenbeutel, A. Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit interaction of light. Science 346, 67–71 (2014).Xi, Z., Lu, Y., Yu, W., Wang, P. & Ming, H. Unidirectional surface plasmon launcher: rotating dipole mimicked by optical antennas. J. Opt. 16, 105002 (2014).Frisch, R. Experimental demonstration of Einstein’s radiation recoil. Zeitschrift für Phys. 86, 42–45 (1933).Wylie, J. M. & Sipe, J. E. Quantum electrodynamics near an interface. II. Phys. Rev. A 32, 2030–2043 (1985).Fichet, M., Schuller, F., Bloch, D. & Ducloy, M. van der Waals interactions between excited-state atoms and dispersive dielectric surfaces. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1553–1564 (1995).Failache, H., Saltiel, S., Fichet, M., Bloch, D. & Ducloy, M. Resonant van der Waals repulsion between excited Cs atoms and sapphire surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5467–5470 (1999).Gordon, J. P. & Ashkin, A. Motion of atoms in a radiation trap. Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606–1617 (1980).Chaumet, P. C. & Nieto-Vesperinas, M. Time-averaged total force on a dipolar sphere in an electromagnetic field. Opt. Lett. 25, 1065–1067 (2000).Ishimaru, A. Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation, and Scattering Prentice Hall (1990).Söllner, I., Mahmoodian, S., Javadi, A. & Lodahl, P. A chiral spin-photon interface for scalable on-chip quantum-information processing. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4295 (2014).Rotenberg, N. et al. Magnetic and electric response of single subwavelength holes. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 88, 241408 (2013).Sukhov, S., Kajorndejnukul, V. & Dogariu, A. Dynamic Consequences of Optical Spin-Orbit Interaction. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01766 (2015).Scheel, S., Buhmann, S. Y., Clausen, C. & Schneeweiss, P. Directional spontaneous emission and lateral Casimir-Polder force on an atom close to a nanofiber. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.01275 (2015).Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Engheta, N., Martínez, A. & Zayats, A. V. Lateral Forces Acting on Particles Near a Surface Under Circularly Polarized Illumination. in 5th Inte rnational Topical Meeting on Nanophotonics and Metamaterials (Nanometa) (2-914771-91-6, Seefeld, Austria 2015).Bochenkov, V. et al. Applications of plasmonics: general discussion. Faraday Discuss. 178, 435–466 (2015).Dogariu, A. & Schwartz, C. Conservation of angular momentum of light in single scattering. Opt. Express 14, 8425–8433 (2006).Haefner, D., Sukhov, S. & Dogariu, A. Spin hall effect of light in spherical geometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 123903 (2009).Bliokh, K. Y. et al. Spin-to-orbit angular momentum conversion in focusing, scattering, and imaging systems. Opt. Express 19, 26132–26149 (2011)

Gravitational Lensing in Astronomy

Deflection of light by gravity was predicted by General Relativity and observationaly confirmed in 1919. In the following decades various aspects of the gravitational lens effect were explored theoretically, among them the possibility of multiple or ring-like images of background sources, the use of lensing as a gravitational telescope on very faint and distant objects, and the possibility to determine Hubble's constant with lensing. Only relatively recently gravitational lensing became an observational science after the discovery of the first doubly imaged quasar in 1979. Today lensing is a booming part of astrophysics. In addition to multiply-imaged quasars, a number of other aspects of lensing have been discovered since, e.g. giant luminous arcs, quasar microlensing, Einstein rings, galactic microlensing events, arclets, or weak gravitational lensing. By now literally hundreds of individual gravitational lens phenomena are known. Although still in its childhood, lensing has established itself as a very useful astrophysical tool with some remarkable successes. It has contributed significant new results in areas as different as the cosmological distance scale, the large scale matter distribution in the universe, mass and mass distribution of galaxy clusters, physics of quasars, dark matter in galaxy halos, or galaxy structure.Comment: Review article for "Living Reviews in Relativity", see http://www.livingreviews.org . 41 pages, latex, 22 figures (partly in GIF format due to size constraints). High quality postscript files can be obtained electronically at http://www.aip.de:8080/~jkw/review_figures.htm

Flexible coherent control of plasmonic spin-Hall effect

The surface plasmon polariton is an emerging candidate for miniaturizing optoelectronic circuits. Recent demonstrations of polarization-dependent splitting using metasurfaces, including focal-spot shifting and unidirectional propagation, allow us to exploit the spin degree of freedom in plasmonics. However, further progress has been hampered by the inability to generate more complicated and independent surface plasmon profiles for two incident spins, which work coherently together for more flexible and tunable functionalities. Here by matching the geometric phases of the nano-slots on silver to specific super-impositions of the inward and outward surface plasmon profiles for the two spins, arbitrary spin-dependent orbitals can be generated in a slot-free region. Furthermore, motion pictures with a series of picture frames can be assembled and played by varying the linear polarization angle of incident light. This spin-enabled control of orbitals is potentially useful for tip-free near-field scanning microscopy, holographic data storage, tunable plasmonic tweezers, and integrated optical components