17 research outputs found
Minimal Obstructions for Partial Representations of Interval Graphs
Interval graphs are intersection graphs of closed intervals. A generalization
of recognition called partial representation extension was introduced recently.
The input gives an interval graph with a partial representation specifying some
pre-drawn intervals. We ask whether the remaining intervals can be added to
create an extending representation. Two linear-time algorithms are known for
solving this problem.
In this paper, we characterize the minimal obstructions which make partial
representations non-extendible. This generalizes Lekkerkerker and Boland's
characterization of the minimal forbidden induced subgraphs of interval graphs.
Each minimal obstruction consists of a forbidden induced subgraph together with
at most four pre-drawn intervals. A Helly-type result follows: A partial
representation is extendible if and only if every quadruple of pre-drawn
intervals is extendible by itself. Our characterization leads to a linear-time
certifying algorithm for partial representation extension
Bounded Representations of Interval and Proper Interval Graphs
Klavik et al. [arXiv:1207.6960] recently introduced a generalization of
recognition called the bounded representation problem which we study for the
classes of interval and proper interval graphs. The input gives a graph G and
in addition for each vertex v two intervals L_v and R_v called bounds. We ask
whether there exists a bounded representation in which each interval I_v has
its left endpoint in L_v and its right endpoint in R_v. We show that the
problem can be solved in linear time for interval graphs and in quadratic time
for proper interval graphs.
Robert's Theorem states that the classes of proper interval graphs and unit
interval graphs are equal. Surprisingly the bounded representation problem is
polynomially solvable for proper interval graphs and NP-complete for unit
interval graphs [Klav\'{\i}k et al., arxiv:1207.6960]. So unless P = NP, the
proper and unit interval representations behave very differently.
The bounded representation problem belongs to a wider class of restricted
representation problems. These problems are generalizations of the
well-understood recognition problem, and they ask whether there exists a
representation of G satisfying some additional constraints. The bounded
representation problems generalize many of these problems
Extending Upward Planar Graph Drawings
In this paper we study the computational complexity of the Upward Planarity
Extension problem, which takes in input an upward planar drawing of
a subgraph of a directed graph and asks whether can be
extended to an upward planar drawing of . Our study fits into the line of
research on the extensibility of partial representations, which has recently
become a mainstream in Graph Drawing.
We show the following results.
First, we prove that the Upward Planarity Extension problem is NP-complete,
even if has a prescribed upward embedding, the vertex set of coincides
with the one of , and contains no edge.
Second, we show that the Upward Planarity Extension problem can be solved in
time if is an -vertex upward planar -graph. This
result improves upon a known -time algorithm, which however applies to
all -vertex single-source upward planar graphs.
Finally, we show how to solve in polynomial time a surprisingly difficult
version of the Upward Planarity Extension problem, in which is a directed
path or cycle with a prescribed upward embedding, contains no edges, and no
two vertices share the same -coordinate in
Contact Representations of Planar Graphs - Extending a Partial Representation is Hard
International audienc
Extending Partial Representations of Circle Graphs
The partial representation extension problem is a recently introduced generalization of the recognition problem. A circle graph is an intersection graph of chords of a circle. We study the partial representation extension problem for circle graphs, where the input consists of a graph G and a partial representation R′ giving some pre-drawn chords that represent an induced subgraph of G. The question is whether one can extend R′ to a representation R of the entire G, i.e., whether one can draw the remaining chords into a partially pre-drawn representation.
Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm for partial representation extension of circle graphs. To show this, we describe the structure of all representation a circle graph based on split decomposition. This can be of an independent interest
Inserting One Edge into a Simple Drawing Is Hard
A simple drawing D(G) of a graph G is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge e in the complement of G can be inserted into D(G) if there exists a simple drawing of G+e extending D(G). As a result of Levi’s Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of G can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is NP -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles A and a pseudosegment σ , it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle Φσ extending σ for which A∪{Φσ} is again an arrangement of pseudocircles
LNCS
A simple drawing D(G) of a graph G is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge e in the complement of G can be inserted into D(G) if there exists a simple drawing of G+e extending D(G). As a result of Levi’s Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of G can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is NP -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles A and a pseudosegment σ , it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle Φσ extending σ for which A∪{Φσ} is again an arrangement of pseudocircles