3 research outputs found

    The trajectory of symptom burden in exposed and unexposed survivors of a major avalanche disaster: a 30 year long-term follow-up study

    No full text
    Background Limited research exists concerning the long-term effects of avalanches on survivors’ mental health beyond the first years after the accident. The aims of this study were to describe and evaluate possible differences in long-term mental health symptoms after a major avalanche disaster between exposed and unexposed soldiers using a longitudinal design. Method Present mental health symptoms were examined among avalanche exposed (n = 12) and unexposed (n = 9) soldiers by PTSS-10, IES-15 and STAI-12 in four waves (1986–1987 and 2016). Results Binary logistic regression revealed that the odds to score above the cut-off were significantly lower for both groups after one year compared to baseline for PTSS-10 (p = 0.018) and significantly lower after 30 days compared to baseline for IES-15 (p = 0.005). Data did not reveal significant differences between the exposed and unexposed groups regarding adjusted PTSS-10, IES-15 or STAI-12 mean scores compared. Linear mixed model-analyses revealed significant effects of time. The adjusted mean scores declined over time for both groups: PTSS-10 (p = 0.001), IES-15 (p = 0.026) and STAI-12 (p = 0.001), and the time trajectories for PTSS-10 were significantly different between the groups (p = 0.013). Although not significant (all p > 0.05), results indicated that a larger proportion of soldiers in the exposed group experienced posttraumatic stress symptoms (5/12) (PTSS-10 score ≥ 4) and distress symptoms (6/12) (IES-15 score ≥ 26) above cut-off points, 30 years post-disaster. Conclusions The course of mental health symptoms may persist, and even increase, in selected and trained military personnel 30 years after exposure to a natural disaster. These findings may be of great importance for health authorities planning appropriate follow-up

    Cognition in adult patients with newly diagnosed non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy

    No full text
    Objective To evaluate whether cognitive performance is affected in newly diagnosed temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and to determine the most vulnerable cognitive domains. Methods In this baseline longitudinal study, differences in memory and non-memory cognitive functions were assessed using comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries in 21 adult patients with newly diagnosed non-lesional TLE and individually matched controls. In addition, the analyses included ratings of self-perceived emotional status. Results The patients performed more poorly than the control group regarding delayed visual memory (p = 0.013) and executive function tasks related to switching (Trail Making Test and verbal fluency shifting; p = 0.025 and p = 0.03, respectively). We found no differences in verbal learning and memory, attention/working memory/processing speed, and other executive functions. Significance Our results show that patients with TLE often have specific cognitive deficits at time of diagnosis, even in the absence of structural brain abnormalities. This supports the hypothesis that memory dysfunction is linked to an underlying pathology rather than to the effect of recurrent seizures, long-term use of anti-seizure medication, or other epilepsy-related factors. As certain executive functions are affected at an early stage, the pathology may involve brain regions beyond the temporal lobe and may comprise larger brain networks. These results indicate the need for greater awareness of cognition at the time of diagnosis of TLE and before initiation of treatment, and integration of neuropsychological assessment into early routine clinical care
    corecore