10 research outputs found

    The RESET project: constructing a European tephra lattice for refined synchronisation of environmental and archaeological events during the last c. 100 ka

    Get PDF
    This paper introduces the aims and scope of the RESET project (. RESponse of humans to abrupt Environmental Transitions), a programme of research funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (UK) between 2008 and 2013; it also provides the context and rationale for papers included in a special volume of Quaternary Science Reviews that report some of the project's findings. RESET examined the chronological and correlation methods employed to establish causal links between the timing of abrupt environmental transitions (AETs) on the one hand, and of human dispersal and development on the other, with a focus on the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic periods. The period of interest is the Last Glacial cycle and the early Holocene (c. 100-8 ka), during which time a number of pronounced AETs occurred. A long-running topic of debate is the degree to which human history in Europe and the Mediterranean region during the Palaeolithic was shaped by these AETs, but this has proved difficult to assess because of poor dating control. In an attempt to move the science forward, RESET examined the potential that tephra isochrons, and in particular non-visible ash layers (cryptotephras), might offer for synchronising palaeo-records with a greater degree of finesse. New tephrostratigraphical data generated by the project augment previously-established tephra frameworks for the region, and underpin a more evolved tephra 'lattice' that links palaeo-records between Greenland, the European mainland, sub-marine sequences in the Mediterranean and North Africa. The paper also outlines the significance of other contributions to this special volume: collectively, these illustrate how the lattice was constructed, how it links with cognate tephra research in Europe and elsewhere, and how the evidence of tephra isochrons is beginning to challenge long-held views about the impacts of environmental change on humans during the Palaeolithic. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.RESET was funded through Consortium Grants awarded by the Natural Environment Research Council, UK, to a collaborating team drawn from four institutions: Royal Holloway University of London (grant reference NE/E015905/1), the Natural History Museum, London (NE/E015913/1), Oxford University (NE/E015670/1) and the University of Southampton, including the National Oceanography Centre (NE/01531X/1). The authors also wish to record their deep gratitude to four members of the scientific community who formed a consultative advisory panel during the lifetime of the RESET project: Professor Barbara Wohlfarth (Stockholm University), Professor Jørgen Peder Steffensen (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen), Dr. Martin Street (Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Neuwied) and Professor Clive Oppenheimer (Cambridge University). They provided excellent advice at key stages of the work, which we greatly valued. We also thank Jenny Kynaston (Geography Department, Royal Holloway) for construction of several of the figures in this paper, and Debbie Barrett (Elsevier) and Colin Murray Wallace (Editor-in-Chief, QSR) for their considerable assistance in the production of this special volume.Peer Reviewe

    Leveraging Social Media for Geoscience Communication: Insights from the British Geological Survey's Multi-Hazard and Resilience Campaigns

    No full text
    Social media offers a unique avenue for scientific communication; however, it remains underutilised by many scientific organisations. This study examines the social media strategy of the British Geological Survey (BGS), the UK’s leading geoscience organisation, to assess its effectiveness in engaging the public with research on Multi-Hazard and Resilience. We investigate two key research questions; 1. how effectively does BGS engage the public through its social media efforts, and 2. what challenges does BGS face in using these social media platforms to enhance public understanding? Scientific organisations often rely on the deficit model of communication, characterised by a one-way transfer of knowledge. Yet, emerging studies suggest that a dialogue-based approach, tailored to different social media platforms and formats, may foster better public engagement. This paper provides a framework for assessing social media activity that can be applied to scientific organisations worldwide. To address research question 1, we conduct content and sentiment analysis on BGS social media posts – including X, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, and BlueSky – from May 2023 to March 2024. A systematic codebook is developed to categorise descriptive and interpretive variables for any social media output. To answer research question 2, we conduct semi-structured interviews with five BGS employees who manage departmental social media accounts to understand their attitudes towards social media engagement. Our findings suggest several actionable strategies, such as streamlining communication across platforms, maximising the reach of ‘Multi-Hazard and Resilience’ themes, increasing video content output, and better incorporating public feedback. Although focused on BGS, our mixed-methods approach and methodology offer a valuable template for other scientific organisations seeking to enhance their online presence and science communication efforts. This study highlights BGS’s successful establishment of a multi-platform online presence, showcasing a range of content formats that effectively engage audiences

    Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound

    No full text
    Published versio

    5th International Symposium on Focused Ultrasound

    No full text
    corecore