16 research outputs found

    Beyond the Farmer Field School IPM and empowerment in Indonesia

    No full text
    Produced in association with SIDA; part of the Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods ProgrammeAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:4089.2251(no 78) / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreSIGLEGBUnited Kingdo

    Avaliação de larvicidas de origem microbiana no controle da traça-das-crucíferas em couve-flor Evaluation of microbiological larvicides to control diamondback moth in cauliflower

    No full text
    Dois inseticidas biológicos à base de Bacillus thuringiensis subspécies kurstaki (Btk) e aizawai (Bta) e um inseticida não sistêmico de origem biológica, à base de spinosad, foram avaliados em campo contra a traça-das-crucíferas, Plutella xylostella (L.)(Lep.: Plutellidae), em cultivo de couve-flor. O experimento foi realizado em Brazlândia, DF, em uma área de produção regular de hortaliças. A lavoura foi conduzida segundo manejo indicado para a região, sem qualquer intervenção que não o controle da praga. O experimento foi realizado no período de julho a setembro de 2002. O delineamento foi de blocos ao acaso, com quatro tratamentos e quatro repetições. Os produtos foram aplicados em função da média do número de furos produzidos pela praga, presentes nas quatro folhas centrais das plantas, sendo os diferentes tratamentos avaliados semanalmente. Quando a média do número de furos atingia valor igual ou superior a seis, os produtos eram aplicados. Adotando-se este procedimento, aplicou-se três vezes o inseticida spinosad e seis vezes os inseticidas Btk e Bta. Os três tratamentos com inseticidas não diferiram entre si, mas diferiram significativamente da testemunha quanto à produção. As áreas tratadas com Btk produziram 78,1% de cabeças comercializáveis, as tratadas com Bta 76,5% e as tratadas com spinosad 75,5%. No controle houve perda de 34,4% da produção. A utilização dos produtos aumentou a receita da cultura da couve-flor em relação à testemunha, nos valores de R2.505,19comoBtk,R 2.505,19 com o Btk, R 1.954,55 com o Bta e R1.891,65comspinosad.<br>TwobioinsecticidesbasedonBacillusthuringiensissubspecieskurstaki(Btk)andaizawai(Bta)andnon−systemicinsecticideofbiologicaloriginbasedonspinosadwereevaluatedoncauliflowercropfordiamondbackmoth,Plutellaxylostella(L.)(Lep.:Plutellidae)control.TheexperimentwasconductedinavegetableproductionareaofBrazla^ndia,Brazil.Thecropwasconductedusingthesametechnologyofproductionadoptedbyfarmersforpestcontrolmanagement.TheexperimentwasconductedbetweenJulyandSeptember2002.Randomizedblockswithfourtreatmentsandfourreplicationswereused.Sixholesperplantinthefourcentralleaves,wereusedasaparametertoindicatethenecessityofapplyinginsecticides.Thenumberofholeswasevaluatedweekly.BasedonthisparameterspinosadwasappliedthreetimesandBtkandBtasixtimes.Similarresultswereobtainedinthetreatmentsusinginsecticides.Howeversignificantdifferencesinproductionwereobservedbetweentreatmentsinwhichinsecticidewasusedandtheuntreatedcontrol.TheareatreatedwithBtkproduced78.1 1.891,65 com spinosad.<br>Two bioinsecticides based on Bacillus thuringiensis sub species kurstaki (Btk) and aizawai (Bta) and non-systemic insecticide of biological origin based on spinosad were evaluated on cauliflower crop for diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep.:Plutellidae) control. The experiment was conducted in a vegetable production area of Brazlândia, Brazil. The crop was conducted using the same technology of production adopted by farmers for pest control management. The experiment was conducted between July and September 2002. Randomized blocks with four treatments and four replications were used. Six holes per plant in the four central leaves, were used as a parameter to indicate the necessity of applying insecticides. The number of holes was evaluated weekly. Based on this parameter spinosad was applied three times and Btk and Bta six times. Similar results were obtained in the treatments using insecticides. However significant differences in production were observed between treatments in which insecticide was used and the untreated control. The area treated with Btk produced 78.1% of commercial heads, the area treated with Bta 76.5 % and the one treated with spinosad 75.5 %. On the untreated area 34.4% of the production was lost. The increase on profitability per hectare were U 785.32; for Btk U592.99forspinosalandU 592.99 for spinosal and U 612.71 for Bta
    corecore