A multicenter study of Clostridium difficile infection-related colectomy, 2000-2006

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been increasing. Previous studies report that the number of colectomies for CDI is also rising. Outside of a few notable outbreaks, there are few published data documenting increasing severity of CDI. The specific aims of this multiyear, multicenter study were to assess CDI-related colectomy rates and compare CDI-related colectomy rates by CDI surveillance definition. METHODS: Cases of CDI and patients who underwent colectomy were identified electronically from 5 US tertiary-care centers from July 2000 through June 2006. Chart review was performed to determine if a colectomy was for CDI. Monthly CDI-related colectomy rates were calculated as the number of CDI-related colectomies per 1,000 CDI cases. Data between observational groups were compared using χ(2) and Mann-Whitney U tests. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk factors for CDI-related colectomy. RESULTS: 8569 cases of CDI were identified and 75 patients had CDI-related colectomy. The overall colectomy rate was 8.7/1,000 CDI cases. The CDI-related colectomy rate ranged from 0 to 23 per 1,000 CDI episodes across hospitals. The colectomy rates for healthcare facility (HCF)-onset CDI was 4.3/1000 CDI cases and 16.5 /1000 CDI cases for community-onset CDI (p <.05). There were significantly more CDI-related colectomies at hospitals B and C (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The overall CDI-related colectomy rate was low, and there was no significant change in the CDI-related colectomy rate over time. Onset of disease outside of the study hospital was an independent risk factor for colectomy

Implementing automated surveillance for tracking Clostridium difficile infection at multiple healthcare facilities

Automated surveillance utilizing electronically available data has been found to be accurate and save time. An automated CDI surveillance algorithm was validated at four CDC Prevention Epicenters hospitals. Electronic surveillance was highly sensitive, specific, and showed good to excellent agreement for hospital-onset; community-onset, study facility associated; indeterminate; and recurrent CDI