Next-generation sequencing for pediatric CNS tumors: does it add value in a middle-income country setup?

IntroductionAdvances in molecular diagnostics led to improved targeted interventions in the treatment of pediatric CNS tumors. However, the capacity to test for these is limited in LMICs, and thus their value needs exploration.MethodsWe reviewed our experience with NGS testing (TruSight RNA Pan-Cancer-seq panel) for pediatric CNS tumors at KHCC/Jordan (March/2022–April/2023). Paraffin blocks’ scrolls were shipped to the SickKids laboratory based on the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) recommendations. We reviewed the patients’ characteristics, the tumor types, and the NGS results’ impact on treatment.ResultsOf 237 patients discussed during the MDC meetings, 32 patients (14%) were included. They were 16 boys and 16 girls; the median age at time of testing was 9.5 years (range, 0.9–21.9 years). There were 21 samples sent at diagnosis and 11 upon tumor progression. The main diagnoses were low-grade-glioma (15), high-grade-glioma (10), and other histologies (7). Reasons to request NGS included searching for a targetable alteration (20) and to better characterize the tumor behavior (12). The median turnaround time from samples’ shipment to receiving the results was 23.5 days (range, 15–49 days) with a median laboratory processing time of 16 days (range, 8–39 days) at a cost of US$1,000/sample. There were 19 (59%) tumors that had targetable alterations (FGFR/MAPK pathway inhibitors (14), checkpoint inhibitors (2), NTRK inhibitors (2), and one with PI3K inhibitor or IDH1 inhibitor). Two rare BRAF mutations were identified (BRAFp.G469A, BRAFp.K601E). One tumor diagnosed initially as undifferentiated round cell sarcoma harbored NAB2::STAT6 fusion and was reclassified as an aggressive metastatic solitary fibrous tumor. Another tumor initially diagnosed as grade 2 astroblastoma grade 2 was reclassified as low-grade-glioma in the absence of MN1 alteration. NGS failed to help characterize a tumor that was diagnosed histologically as small round blue cell tumor. Nine patients received targeted therapy; dabrafenib/trametinib (6), pembrolizumab (2), and entrectinib (1), mostly upon tumor progression (7).ConclusionIn this highly selective cohort, a high percentage of targetable mutations was identified facilitating targeted therapies. Outsourcing of NGS testing was feasible; however, criteria for case selection are needed. In addition, local capacity-building in conducting the test, interpretation of the results, and access to “new drugs” continue to be a challenge in LMICs

Video-Teleconferencing in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Ten Years of Experience

Purpose: The management of central nervous system tumors is challenging in low- and middle-income countries. Little is known about applicability of twinning initiatives with high-income countries in neuro-oncology. In 2004, a monthly neuro-oncology video-teleconference program was started between King Hussein Cancer Center (Amman, Jordan) and the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). More than 100 conferences were held and > 400 cases were discussed. The aim of this work was to assess the sustainability of such an initiative and the evolution of the impact over time. Methods: We divided the duration in to three eras according to the initial 2 to 3 years of work of three consecutive oncologists in charge of the neuro-oncology program at King Hussein Cancer Center. We retrospectively reviewed the written minutes and compared the preconference suggested plans with the postconference recommendations. Impact of changes on the patient care was recorded. Results: Thirty-three sets of written minutes (covering 161 cases) in the middle era and 32 sets of written minutes (covering 122 cases) in the last era were compared with the initial experience (20 meetings, 72 cases). Running costs of these conferences has dropped from $360/h to <$40/h. Important concepts were introduced, such as multidisciplinary teamwork, second-look surgery, and early referral. Suggestions for plan changes have decreased from 44% to 30% and 24% in the respective consecutive eras. Most recommendations involved alternative intervention modalities or pathology review. Most of these recommendations were followed. Conclusion: Video-teleconferencing in neuro-oncology is feasible and sustainable. With time, team experience is built while the percentage and the type of treatment modifications change. Commitment and motivation helped maintain this initiative rather than availability of financial resources. Improvement in patients’ care was achieved, in particular, with the implementation of a multidisciplinary team and the continuous effort to implement recommendations

Video-Teleconferencing in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Ten Years of Experience.

PurposeThe management of central nervous system tumors is challenging in low- and middle-income countries. Little is known about applicability of twinning initiatives with high-income countries in neuro-oncology. In 2004, a monthly neuro-oncology video-teleconference program was started between King Hussein Cancer Center (Amman, Jordan) and the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). More than 100 conferences were held and &gt; 400 cases were discussed. The aim of this work was to assess the sustainability of such an initiative and the evolution of the impact over time.MethodsWe divided the duration in to three eras according to the initial 2 to 3 years of work of three consecutive oncologists in charge of the neuro-oncology program at King Hussein Cancer Center. We retrospectively reviewed the written minutes and compared the preconference suggested plans with the postconference recommendations. Impact of changes on the patient care was recorded.ResultsThirty-three sets of written minutes (covering 161 cases) in the middle era and 32 sets of written minutes (covering 122 cases) in the last era were compared with the initial experience (20 meetings, 72 cases). Running costs of these conferences has dropped from 360/h to < 40/h. Important concepts were introduced, such as multidisciplinary teamwork, second-look surgery, and early referral. Suggestions for plan changes have decreased from 44% to 30% and 24% in the respective consecutive eras. Most recommendations involved alternative intervention modalities or pathology review. Most of these recommendations were followed.ConclusionVideo-teleconferencing in neuro-oncology is feasible and sustainable. With time, team experience is built while the percentage and the type of treatment modifications change. Commitment and motivation helped maintain this initiative rather than availability of financial resources. Improvement in patients' care was achieved, in particular, with the implementation of a multidisciplinary team and the continuous effort to implement recommendations

RARE-55. Challenges and specific strategies for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome in low resource settings. on behalf of the international RRD consortium in low resource settings panel

Germline biallelic mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes (MSH2/MSH6/MLH1/PMS2 results in constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), a condition associated with multiple tumors arising from multiple organs during childhood, and these individuals rarely reach adulthood. The paucity of information with respect to these conditions leads to mismanagement and may be a factor in the high mortality of patients with CMMRD. Two international consortia, the European CARE4CMMRD, and the international replication repair deficiency (RRD) consortium, are addressing the many challenges associated with this condition. To address specific issues surrounding the management of CMMRD in low and middle income countries (LMIC), a multidisciplinary taskforce of 11 specialists from nine countries was formed. Preliminary conclusions are: 1) Immunohistochemistry for CMMRD should be considered for all patients with suggestive clinical features. In countries where CMMRD is common, malignant gliomas, colon cancers and T cell lymphomas should be stained routinely as the prevalence of CMMRD in these tumors can exceed 40%. 2) Temozolomide should not be used in the management of malignant glioma. By contrast, preclinical studies have suggested increased sensitivity to nitrosoureas. For the management of CMMRD related lymphoma and leukemia, mercaptopurines should not be avoided or discontinued as a part of the standard of care before more data are collected. 3) Management with checkpoint inhibitors should be limited to centers with intensive care units and expertise in complex supportive care to manage side effects of immune therapy. 4) Surveillance protocols have demonstrated long term survival benefits and should be implemented in LMIC

DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOW GRADE GLIOMAS IN LOWER AND LOWER MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES - A SIOP PODC INITIATIVE

17th International Symposium on Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (ISPNO) -- JUN 12-15, 2016 -- Liverpool, ENGLANDWOS: 00037974900048

SIOP PODC Adapted treatment guidelines for low grade gliomas in low and middle income settings

Effective treatment of children with low grade glioma (LGG) requires a functioning multi-disciplinary team with adequate neurosurgical, neuroradiological, pathological, radiotherapy and chemotherapy facilities and personnel. In addition, the treating centre should have the capacity to manage a variety of LGG and treatment-associated complications. These requirements have made it difficult for many centers in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) to offer effective treatment and follow up. This article provides management recommendations for children with LGG according to the level of facilities available