7 research outputs found

    Editorial

    Get PDF
    Π Π΅Π΄Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ€ Editoria

    A case of acute infective endocarditis and septic shock

    Get PDF
    Π˜Π½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΡΡ‚ Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΡ‚ (Π˜Π•) Π±Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΆΠΈ нарастваща заболяСмост ΠΈ нСпромСняща сС ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ Π²ΡŠΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡŠΠΊΠ° Π² диагностиката ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΡƒ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 20% ΠΎΡ‚ случаитС Π˜Π• ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π° остро, с ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈ Π½Π° сСпсис ΠΈ сСптичСн шок, ΠΊΠΎΠΉΡ‚ΠΎ влошава Π΄Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΈ Π΅ нСзависим ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ Π·Π° Π²ΡŠΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚. НаврСмСнното диагностициранС ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ…ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° интСрвСнция ΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‚ Π΄Π° подобрят прСТивяСмостта ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡΠΌΠ΅ случай Π½Π° 47-годишСн мъТ, Π±Π΅Π· Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π·Π° Π·Π° ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡŠΠΏΡŠΡ‚ΡΡ‚Π²Π°Ρ‰ΠΈ заболявания, ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŠΠΏΠΈΠ» ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ Π² Π˜Π½Ρ‚Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ Π½Π° COVID-19 пандСмията, с ΠΈΠ·Ρ€Π°Π·Π΅Π½ Ρ„Π΅Π±Ρ€ΠΈΠ»Π½ΠΎ-интоксикационСн синдром, Π·Π°Π΄ΡƒΡ…, ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ€Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π»Π΅Π½ дискомфорт ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ°, ΠΊΠ°ΡˆΠ»ΠΈΡ†Π°, Ρ…Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠ΅. ΠžΡ‚ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ изслСдвания ΠΈΠΌΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·Ρ€Π°Π·Π΅Π½Π° Π²ΡŠΠ·ΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π½Π° констСлация, ΡΡŠΡ‰ΠΎ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠ° ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ½ I ΠΈ D-Π΄ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈ. Π’ΠΎΠ·ΠΈ случай ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π²Π° трудноститС Π² диагностиката Π½Π° острия Π˜Π•, спСцификитС Π² клиничния Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ Π½Π° болСстта, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΈ Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ…ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° интСрвСнция Π·Π° подобряванС Π½Π° прСТивяСмостта. Infective endocarditis (IE) marks an increasing morbidity and unchanged mortality despite advances in its diagnosis and treatment. In about 20% of IE cases are acute, with signs of sepsis and septic shock. Septic shock dramatically worsens prognosis and is an independent predictor of in – hospital death. Timely diagnosis and urgent surgical intervention can improve survival in these patients. We present a case of a 47-year-old man, with no history of past or concomitant diseases, who was admitted as an emergency to the Cardiology Intensive Care Unit, during the COVID-19 pandemic, with pronounced febrile-intoxication syndrome, shortness of breath, precordial discomfort and pain, cough, haemoptysis. From laboratory studies with a pronounced infl ammatory constellation, troponin I and D-dimers are also increased. This case shows the diffi culties in the diagnosis of acute IE, the specifi cs in the clinical course of the disease, as well as the importance of urgent surgical intervention to improve survival

    Hypertension in pregnancy as an early sex-specific risk factor for cardiovascular diseases: evidence and awareness

    No full text
    Despite being a physiological condition, human pregnancy is known to cause numerous complications that can endanger the life of the mother and the fetus alike. While the majority of complications are mostly limited within the peripartum period, more and more information is available about persistently higher short- and long-term cardiovascular risk after a pregnancy complicated by a hypertensive disorder. There is evidence that women after gestational hypertension or preeclampsia are more likely to develop arterial hypertension, coronary atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral artery disease, and even diabetes mellitus and venous thromboembolism years after the target pregnancy. This has urged some authors to view hypertensive disorders of pregnancy as a β€œstress test” for the maternal organism that unmasks latent endothelial dysfunction. An explanation is sought in the presence of common risk factors and underlying pathological pathways with cardiovascular diseases, although a certain etiological mechanism for the development of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy has not been established yet. More attention is needed towards the follow-up of women after a hypertensive pregnancy as it could be an opportunity for early prevention of cardiovascular diseases

    High-sensitivity CRP levels in women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and in normotensive pregnant women and its correlations

    No full text
    Introduction: Gestational hypertension is a less investigated hypertensive disorder of pregnancy than preeclampsia, but evidence exists of an unfavourable cardiovascular profile for women after such a pregnancy.Aim: To determine serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in women with preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and in normotensive pregnancy in order to assess the cardiovascular implications and to examine its correlations with some characteristics of women.Materials and methods: Thirty-six women with gestational hypertension, thirty-seven with preeclampsia, and fifty maternal and gestational age-matched controls were included in a single-center prospective clinical-epidemiological study. Serum hs-CRP levels were determined using ELISA method.Results: Significantly higher hs-CRP levels were found in the gestational hypertension group than in the controls (p=0.043), but not in the preeclampsia group (p=0.445). The levels between the two pathological groups did not differ significantly (p=0.247). Odds ratio for hs-CRP levels higher than the provided cut-off was 3.31 (95% CI 1.32–8.29) for the presence of gestational hypertension. In the normotensive pregnant women, the hs-CRP levels had a positive correlation with BSA, pre-pregnancy and current BMI, but such correlations were absent in the hypertensive groups. There were no correlations with the maternal or gestational age, current weight gain in any of the groups or with the highest detected blood pressure in the pathological groups. These levels did not differ according to gravidity, smoking status and smoking during pregnancy.Conclusions: Elevation of hs-CRP was more pronounced in women with gestational hypertension than in women with preeclampsia, which could indicate a different pathophysiological mechanism and a higher cardiovascular risk for those women

    Characteristics of infective endocarditis according to the mode of acquisition – a single-center, retrospective analysis

    Get PDF
    Π‘ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π΅Π΄ Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ инфСкциозният Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΡ‚ (Π˜Π•) сС класифицира ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ общСствСно ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ – CAIE (Community acquired IE), ΡΠ²ΡŠΡ€Π·Π°Π½ със Π·Π΄Ρ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΈ Π³Ρ€ΠΈΠΆΠΈ – HAIE (Health care–associated infective endocarditis) ΠΈ Π˜Π•, Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π²Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π° наркомания – IDUIE (intravenous drug use–related IE). На Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·ΠΈ Π΅Ρ‚Π°ΠΏ липсват Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΈ Π·Π° Π‘ΡŠΠ»Π³Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ Π·Π° Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈ Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»: ΠŸΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΠΈΡ…ΠΌΠ΅ си Π·Π° Ρ†Π΅Π» Π΄Π° изслСдвамС Π˜Π• спорСд Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-инструмСнтална характСристика Π½Π° Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈΡ‚Π΅. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ: ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΡƒΡ‡Π²Π°Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π΅ Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ, рСтроспСктивно ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π²Π° 270 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ, Π»Π΅ΠΊΡƒΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈ Π² Π£ΠœΠ‘ΠΠ› β€œΠ‘Π². Π“Π΅ΠΎΡ€Π³ΠΈβ€œ – Пловдив, Π·Π° ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° 01.2005-12.2021 Π³. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΈ: ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ със CAIE са 64.8% (175), с HAIE 26,7% (72) ΠΈ с IDUIE 8,5% (23). ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ с IDUIE са ΠΏΠΎ-ΠΌΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈ спрямо останалитС Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ – 33 (8) Π³. (Ρ€ = 0.000), с ниска коморбидност (CCI – 1, IQR 1; p = 0.000), с Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСсто дСсностранно засяганС (p < 0.001), с чСсто услоТнСниС сСптичСн шок – 21.7% (Ρ€ = 0.017) ΠΈ с Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСст ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π» Staphylococcus aureus (Ρ€ < 0.01). ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ с HAIE са Π½Π°ΠΉ-Π²ΡŠΠ·Ρ€Π°ΡΡ‚Π½ΠΈ (69; 18 Π³.), с Π½Π°ΠΉ-голяма коморбидност (CCI 4, IQR 3), Π±Π΅Π· сигнификантна Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° със CAIE (66; 20 Π³. ΠΈ CCI 3 IQR 3). ГолСмият дял Π²Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π° Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ тях са ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΏΡƒΠ»Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ/ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡ€ΠΈ (62.5%) ΠΈ Ρ…Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° (18.1%), с Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСст ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π» Enterococci (19.5%, Ρ€ = 0.001). CAIE сС причинява Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСсто ΠΎΡ‚ Staphylococci (29.6%) ΠΈ Streptococci (12%). Π’ΡŠΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΡΠΌΡŠΡ€Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° Ρ…ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° интСрвСнция са Π±Π΅Π· сигнификантна Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π² Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ. Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅: ΠŸΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π²Π°Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΈ Π˜Π• спорСд Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ½Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ²Π°Π½Π΅ – CAIE, HAIE ΠΈ IDUIE, ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ характСристики, Π΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΎΡ€Π° Π½Π° Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π½ΠΎ Π΅ΠΌΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ подобряванС Π½Π° прСвСнцията. According to the mode of acquisition, infective endocarditis (IE) is classifi ed as community-acquired (CAIE), healthcareassociated (HAIE), and injection drug use–related IE (IDUIE). At this stage, there are no data for Bulgaria for these three groups of patients. Objective: We set ourselves the goal of investigating IE according to the mode of acquisition and to make a clinical-instrumental characterization of the groups. Material and methods: The study is single-center, retrospective and includes 270 patients treated at the UMHAT β€œSveti Georgi” – Plovdiv for the period 01.2005-12. 2021. Results: Patients with CAIE were 64.8% (175), with HAIE 26.7% (72) and with IDUIE 8.5% (23). Patients with IDUIE are younger compared to the other two groups (33; 8 years) (p = 0.000), with low comorbidity (CCI – 1, IQR – 1; p = 0.000), with most frequent right-sided involvement (p < 0.001) and with the most common causative agent being Staphylococcus aureus (p < 0.01). Patients with HAIE were the oldest (69; 18 years;), with the most comorbidity (CCI – 4; IQR – 3), with no signifi cant difference with CAIE (66; 20 years; and CCI – 3; IQR – 3). The large proportion of portal of entry for them were manipulations/ procedures (62.5%) and hemodialysis (18.1%), with Enterococci being the most common causative agent (19.5%, p = 0.001). In-hospital mortality and early surgical intervention were without signifi cant difference in the three groups. Conclusion: Knowledge of the three groups of IE according to the mode of acquisition – CAIE, HAIE and IDUIE and their characteristics is important for the choice of initial empiric antibiotic treatment and for improvement of prevention

    High-sensitivity CRP levels in women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and in normotensive pregnant women and its correlations

    No full text
    Introduction: Gestational hypertension is a less investigated hypertensive disorder of pregnancy than preeclampsia, but evidence exists of an unfavourable cardiovascular profile for women after such a pregnancy.Aim: To determine serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in women with preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and in normotensive pregnancy in order to assess the cardiovascular implications and to examine its correlations with some characteristics of women.Materials and methods: Thirty-six women with gestational hypertension, thirty-seven with preeclampsia, and fifty maternal and gestational age-matched controls were included in a single-center prospective clinical-epidemiological study. Serum hs-CRP levels were determined using ELISA method.Results: Significantly higher hs-CRP levels were found in the gestational hypertension group than in the controls (p=0.043), but not in the preeclampsia group (p=0.445). The levels between the two pathological groups did not differ significantly (p=0.247). Odds ratio for hs-CRP levels higher than the provided cut-off was 3.31 (95% CI 1.32–8.29) for the presence of gestational hypertension. In the normotensive pregnant women, the hs-CRP levels had a positive correlation with BSA, pre-pregnancy and current BMI, but such correlations were absent in the hypertensive groups. There were no correlations with the maternal or gestational age, current weight gain in any of the groups or with the highest detected blood pressure in the pathological groups. These levels did not differ according to gravidity, smoking status and smoking during pregnancy.Conclusions: Elevation of hs-CRP was more pronounced in women with gestational hypertension than in women with preeclampsia, which could indicate a different pathophysiological mechanism and a higher cardiovascular risk for those women

    Acute neurological symptoms as a debut of infective endocarditis

    Get PDF
    Π˜Π½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΡΡ‚ Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΡ‚ (Π˜Π•) Π΅ Π²ΡŠΠ·ΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π½ΠΎ заболяванС Π½Π° Π΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ€Π΄Π° Π½Π° ΡΡŠΡ€Ρ†Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎ, засягащо ΡΡŠΡ€Π΄Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΏΠΈ (Π½Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ), Π° Π² послСднитС няколко дСсСтилСтия ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ Π²ΡŠΡ‚Ρ€Π΅ΡΡŠΡ€Π΄Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΈ постоянни устройства ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈ. Π’ΡŠΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΊΠΈ тСхнологичния прогрСс ΠΈ натрупания ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ‚, Ρ‚Π°Π·ΠΈ болСст Π½Π΅ спира Π΄Π° бъдС ΠΎΠ³Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎ прСдизвикатСлство Π·Π° Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° диагностика, Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ подобряванС Π½Π° прСТивяСмостта. ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° Π΅ Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°, с Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ β€žΠΌΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈβ€œ Π½Π° Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈ заболявания – ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈ, ΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ, Ρ…Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ, Ρ€Π΅Π²ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ, Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€. Π•ΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ услоТнСния чСсто са ΠΏΡŠΡ€Π²Π° изява Π½Π° болСстта, ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΉ-чСсто са ΠΌΠΎΠ·ΡŠΡ‡Π½ΠΈ. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡΠΌΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ случай Π½Π° 29 Π³. ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π°, с остра Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° симптоматика ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡŠΡ€Π²Π° проява Π½Π° Π˜Π•. Π’ΠΎΠ·ΠΈ случай отразява Π½Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏΠΈΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π° прСзСнтация Π½Π° заболяванСто, Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·Π½ΠΈ модалности Π² ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° диагностика Π½Π° Π½Π΅Π²Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‚Π΅ услоТнСния, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π·Π° Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ‚Π° интСрвСнция, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‚ΠΎ Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ·Π°Π½Π°. ΠžΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π° ΠΎΡ‚Π²ΠΎΡ€Π΅Π½ Π²ΡŠΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΡŠΡ‚ Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° Π½Π° Π˜Π• ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ умСрСнорисковитС ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ са Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈ с ΠΌΠΈΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΏΠ΅Π½ пролапс ΠΈ бикуспидна Π°ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚Π½Π° ΠΊΠ»Π°ΠΏΠ°. Infective endocarditis (IE) is an infl ammatory disease of the endocardium of the heart affecting heart valves (native or prosthetic) and, in the last few decades, also available intracardiac permanent devices or catheters. Despite technological progress and accumulated experience, this disease continues to be a huge challenge for doctors in terms of diagnosis, treatment and improvement of survival. The clinical picture is atypical and heterogeneous, with different clinical "masks" of other diseases – infectious, oncological, hematological, rheumatological, neurological, etc. Embolic complications are often the fi rst manifestation of the disease and are most often cerebral. We present a clinical case of a 29-year-old woman with acute neurological symptoms as a fi rst manifestation of IE. This case refl ects the atypical clinical presentation of the disease, the importance of new imaging modalities for the precise diagnosis of neurological complications, and the decision on the timing of operative intervention when indicated. The question of IE prophylaxis in moderate-risk patients, such as those with mitral valve prolapse and bicuspid aortic valve, remains open
    corecore