Early resuscitation with lyophilized plasma provides equal neuroprotection compared with fresh frozen plasma in a large animal survival model of traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND Combined traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhagic shock (HS) is highly lethal. In previous models of combined TBI + HS, we showed that early resuscitation with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) improves neurologic outcomes. Delivering FFP, however, in austere environments is difficult. Lyophilized plasma (LP) is a logistically superior alternative to FFP, but data are limited regarding its efficacy for treatment of TBI. We conducted this study to determine the safety and long-term outcomes of early treatment with LP in a large animal model of TBI + HS. METHODS Adult anesthetized swine underwent TBI and volume-controlled hemorrhage (40% blood volume) concurrently. After 2 hours of shock, animals were randomized (n = 5 per /group) to FFP or LP (1× shed blood) treatment. Serial blood gases were drawn, and thromboelastography was performed on citrated, kaolin-activated whole-blood samples. Five hours after treatment, packed red blood cells were administered, and animals recovered. A 32-point Neurologic Severity Score was assessed daily for 30 days (0 = normal, 32 = most severe injury). Cognitive functions were tested by training animals to retrieve food from color-coded boxes. Brain lesion size was measured on serial magnetic resonance imaging, and an autopsy was performed at 30 days. RESULTS The severity of shock and the degree of resuscitation were similar in both groups. Administration of FFP and LP was well tolerated with no differences in reversal of shock or thromboelastography parameters. Animals in both groups displayed the worst Neurologic Severity Score on postoperative Day 1 with rapid recovery and return to baseline within 7 days of injury. Lesion size on Day 3 in FFP-treated animals was 645 ± 85 versus 219 ± 20 mm 3 in LP-treated animals (p < 0.05). There were no differences in cognitive functions or delayed treatment-related complications. CONCLUSIONS Early treatment with LP in TBI + HS is safe and provides neuroprotection that is comparable to FFP

Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Provide Neuroprotection and Improve Long-Term Neurologic Outcomes in a Swine Model of Traumatic Brain Injury and Hemorrhagic Shock

Combined traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hemorrhagic shock (HS) remains a leading cause of preventable death worldwide. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes have demonstrated promise in small animal models of neurologic injury. To investigate the effects of exosome treatment in a clinically realistic large animal model, Yorkshire swine underwent TBI and HS. Animals were maintained in shock for 2 h before resuscitation with normal saline (NS). Animals were then resuscitated either with NS (3 x volume of shed blood) or with the same volume of NS with delayed exosome administration (1 x 10(13) particles/4 mL) (n = 5/cohort). Exosomes were administered 9 h post-injury, and on post-injury days (PID) 1, 5, 9, and 13. Neurologic severity scores (NSS) were assessed for 30 days, and neurocognitive functions were objectively measured. Exosome-treated animals had significantly lower NSS (p \u3c 0.05) during the first five days of recovery. Exosome-treated animals also had a significantly shorter time to complete neurologic recovery (NSS = 0) compared with animals given NS alone (days to recovery: NS = 16.8 +/- 10.6; NS + exosomes = 5.6 +/- 2.8; p = 0.03). Animals treated with exosomes initiated neurocognitive testing earlier (days to initiation: NS = 9.6 +/- 0.5 vs. NS + exosomes = 4.2 +/- 0.8; p = 0.008); however, no difference was seen in time to mastery of tasks. In conclusion, treatment with exosomes attenuates the severity of neurologic injury and allows for faster neurologic recovery in a clinically realistic large animal model of TBI and HS

Pre-Clinical Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury Research: Progress and Use Cases

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an extremely complex condition due to heterogeneity in injury mechanism, underlying conditions, and secondary injury. Pre-clinical and clinical researchers face challenges with reproducibility that negatively impact translation and therapeutic development for improved TBI patient outcomes. To address this challenge, TBI Pre-clinical Working Groups expanded upon previous efforts and developed common data elements (CDEs) to describe the most frequently used experimental parameters. The working groups created 913 CDEs to describe study metadata, animal characteristics, animal history, injury models, and behavioral tests. Use cases applied a set of commonly used CDEs to address and evaluate the degree of missing data resulting from combining legacy data from different laboratories for two different outcome measures (Morris water maze [MWM]; RotorRod/Rotarod). Data were cleaned and harmonized to Form Structures containing the relevant CDEs and subjected to missing value analysis. For the MWM dataset (358 animals from five studies, 44 CDEs), 50% of the CDEs contained at least one missing value, while for the Rotarod dataset (97 animals from three studies, 48 CDEs), over 60% of CDEs contained at least one missing value. Overall, 35% of values were missing across the MWM dataset, and 33% of values were missing for the Rotarod dataset, demonstrating both the feasibility and the challenge of combining legacy datasets using CDEs. The CDEs and the associated forms created here are available to the broader pre-clinical research community to promote consistent and comprehensive data acquisition, as well as to facilitate data sharing and formation of data repositories. In addition to addressing the challenge of standardization in TBI pre-clinical studies, this effort is intended to bring attention to the discrepancies in assessment and outcome metrics among pre-clinical laboratories and ultimately accelerate translation to clinical research