Poor results of drilling in early stages of juxta-articular osteonecrosis in 12 joints affected by Gaucher disease

Background and purpose Gaucher disease is heterogeneous. One of the most devastating complications is bone involvement, ranging from mild osteopenia to osteonecrosis, but no markers have been discovered to predict onset and/or progression. We describe our experience in a large referral center using drilling for juxta-articular osteonecrosis in young patients with Gaucher disease

Addressing Recruitment Challenges in the Engage-HU Trial in Young Children with Sickle Cell Disease

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder that causes significant medical and neurologic morbidity in children. Hydroxyurea (HU) is the primary medication used to prevent these complications. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines recommend offering HU to children as young as 9 months of age with SCD (HbSS or HbSB0 thalassemia) using a shared decision-making approach. Although HU has proven efficacious it remains underutilized and caregivers report that they are not always actively involved in the decision to initiate this therapy. Reasons for limited HU uptake likely include lack of clinician knowledge and training and negative caregiver perceptions. Thus, we developed the Engage-HU trial as a novel approach to address HU utilization barriers. A critical consideration for this trial was that SCD primarily affects individuals of African and Hispanic/Latino descent. In these minority populations, intervention trials are sometimes terminated early because of recruitment difficulties related to mistrust of research, caregiver burden, and transportation issues. As such, the Engage-HU trial design included best-practice strategies for recruiting people of color in research. This study describes these strategies, the initial recruitment plan, preliminary recruitment outcomes and strategies, and our procedural adaptations. Study Design and Methods: Engage-HU is a randomized control trial (NCT03442114) to assess how clinicians can engage caregivers in a shared discussion that considers their values and preferences and includes evidence that supports HU. Engage-HU compares two dissemination methods for clinicians to facilitate shared decision-making with caregivers of young children with SCD: 1) the American Society of Hematology Pocket Guide, and 2) the HU Shared-Decision Making (H-SDM) Toolkit. The study aims to recruit 174 caregivers and evaluate the effectiveness of the dissemination methods on patient-centered outcomes (caregiver confidence in decision-making and perceptions of experiencing shared decision-making) as well as HU uptake and child health outcomes. Eligible children are aged 0 to 5 years, candidates for HU, and their caregiver has not made a decision about HU in the past 3 months. The trial is being conducted at 9 sites in the United States and uses a stepped-wedge design. Data will be analyzed based on the intent-to-treat principle. All participants will remain in the arm of the study to which they were randomized, regardless of whether or not they receive the assigned dissemination method. The primary endpoints are caregiver decisional uncertainty and caregiver perception of shared decision-making measured using validated tools. Data will be analyzed using a linear mixed effects regression model with a robust variance estimator and maximum likelihood estimation with observations clustered within site. The Engage-HU trial includes adaptations to increase recruitment such as tailored messaging, a relational recruitment approach, streamlined data collection, and a Stakeholder Advisory Committee. However, even with these adaptations, the first 6-months of the trial yielded lower than anticipated recruitment. Rather than terminate the trial or accept low enrollment, the research team implemented a series of recruitment strategies to address barriers including helping to improve research coordinator knowledge of the study purpose and adjusting no-show and follow-up procedures (e.g., calls to families after missed appointments and reminder calls before appointments). Site clinicians and clinic staff were provided with additional training so they could give more context about Engage-HU to caregivers and the study principal investigator led monthly "all coordinator" calls to provide support by sharing updates and experiences about successful recruitment. Implementation of these strategies resulted in triple the number of enrollments over the next 7-months compared to the previous 6-months (Table 1). Our goal in sharing this information is to provide lessons learned that can be implemented in future trials with the systematically underserved SCD population. It is also anticipated that methods described here may also inform clinical approaches to better engage caregivers of young children around critical clinical conversations, such as initiating medications like HU. Disclosures King: Magenta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Consultancy; RiverVest: Consultancy; Novimmune: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Tioma Therapuetics: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; WUGEN: Current equity holder in private company; Cell Works: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Smith-Whitley:Prime: Other: Education material; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Neumayr:Emmaus: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; CTD Holdings: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Micelle: Other: Site principal investigator; GBT: Other: Site principal investigator; PCORI: Other: site principal investigator; Novartis: Other: co-investigator; Bluebird Bio: Other: co-investigator; Sangamo Therapeutics: Other; Silarus: Other; Celgene: Other; La Jolla Pharmaceuticals: Other; Forma: Other; Imara: Other; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Other; Health Resources and Services Administration: Other; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Other; Seattle Children's Research: Other. Yates:Novartis: Research Funding. Thompson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CRISPR/Vertex: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. </jats:sec

Cholecystectomy in sickle cell anemia patients: Perioperative outcome of 364 cases from the national preoperative transfusion study

Cholecystectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in sickle cell anemia (SCA) patients. We investigated the effects of transfusion and surgical method on perioperative outcome. A total of 364 patients underwent cholecystectomy: group 1 (randomized to aggressive transfusion) 110 patients; group 2 (randomized to conservative transfusion) 120 patients; group 3 (nonrandomized nontransfusion) 37 patients; and group 4 (nonrandomized transfusion) 97 patients. Patients were similar except group 3 patients were more likely to be female, over 20 years old, smokers, and more healthy by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score. Total complication rate was 39%: sickle cell events 19%; intraoperative or recovery room events 11%; transfusion complications 10%; postoperative surgical events 4%; and death 1%. Group 3 patients had the highest incidence of sickle cell events (32%). Open cholecystectomies were performed in 58% and laparoscopic in 42%. Laparoscopic patients were younger and more healthy by ASA score. Laparoscopic patients had longer anesthesia time (3,2 v 2.9 hours), but shorter hospitalization time (6.4 days v 9.8). Complications were similar between these two groups, We conclude that SCA patients undergoing cholecystectomy have a high perioperative morbidity, and the incidence of sickle cell events may be higher in patients not preoperatively transfused. We recommend a conservative preoperative transfusion regimen, and we encourage the use of the laparoscopic technique for SCA patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. (C) 1997 by The American Society of Hematology

Mechanisms of plasma non-transferrin bound iron generation: insights from comparing transfused diamond blackfan anaemia with sickle cell and thalassaemia patients

In transfusional iron overload, extra‐hepatic iron distribution differs, depending on the underlying condition. Relative mechanisms of plasma non‐transferrin bound iron (NTBI) generation may account for these differences. Markers of iron metabolism (plasma NTBI, labile iron, hepcidin, transferrin, monocyte SLC40A1 [ferroportin]), erythropoiesis (growth differentiation factor 15, soluble transferrin receptor) and tissue hypoxia (erythropoietin) were compared in patients with Thalassaemia Major (TM), Sickle Cell Disease and Diamond‐Blackfan Anaemia (DBA), with matched transfusion histories. The most striking differences between these conditions were relationships of NTBI to erythropoietic markers, leading us to propose three mechanisms of NTBI generation: iron overload (all), ineffective erythropoiesis (predominantly TM) and low transferrin‐iron utilization (DBA)