9 research outputs found
New Constructions of Hinting PRGs, OWFs with Encryption, and more
Over the last few years there has been a surge of new cryptographic results, including laconic oblivious transfer, (anonymous/ hierarchical) identity-based encryption, trapdoor functions, chosen-ciphertext security transformations, designated-verifier zero knowledge proofs, due to a beautiful framework recently introduced in the works of Cho et al. [Crypto 2017], and D{ö}ttling and Garg [Crypto 2017]. The primitive of one-way function with encryption (OWFE) and its relatives (chameleon encryption, one-time signatures with encryption, hinting PRGs, trapdoor hash encryption, batch encryption) have been a centerpiece in all these results.
While there exist multiple realizations of OWFE (and its relatives) from a variety of assumptions such as CDH, Factoring, and LWE, all such constructions fall under the same general ``missing block framework. Although this framework has been instrumental in opening up a new pathway towards various cryptographic functionalities via the abstraction of OWFE (and its relatives), it has been accompanied with undesirable inefficiencies that has inhibited a much wider adoption in many practical scenarios. Motivated by the surging importance of the OWFE abstraction (and its relatives), a natural question to ask is whether the existing approaches can be diversified to not only obtain more constructions from different assumptions, but also in developing newer frameworks. We believe answering this question will eventually lead to important and previously unexplored performance trade-offs in the overarching applications of this novel cryptographic paradigm.
In this work, we propose a new ``accumulation-style framework for building a new class of OWFE as well as hinting PRG constructions with a special focus on achieving shorter ciphertext size and shorter public parameter size (respectively). Such performance improvements parlay into shorter parameters in their corresponding applications. Briefly, we explore the following performance trade-offs --- (1) for OWFE, our constructions outperform in terms of ciphertext size as well as encryption time, but this comes at the cost of larger evaluation and setup times, (2) for hinting PRGs, our constructions provide a rather dramatic trade-off between evaluation time versus parameter size, with our construction leading to significantly shorter public parameter size. We also provide concrete performance measurements for our constructions and compare them with existing approaches. We believe highlighting such trade-offs will lead to a wider adoption of these abstractions in a practical sense
Separating Semantic and Circular Security for Symmetric-Key Bit Encryption from the Learning with Errors Assumption
In this work we separate private-key semantic security from circular security using the Learning with Error assumption. Prior works used the less standard assumptions of multilinear maps or indistinguishability obfuscation. To achieve our results we develop new techniques for obliviously evaluating branching programs
Noninteractive Zero Knowledge for NP from (Plain) Learning With Errors
We finally close the long-standing problem of constructing a
noninteractive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proof system for any NP language
with security based on the plain Learning With Errors (LWE)
problem, and thereby on worst-case lattice problems. Our proof system
instantiates the framework recently developed by Canetti
et al. [EUROCRYPT\u2718], Holmgren and Lombardi [FOCS\u2718], and Canetti
et al. [STOC\u2719] for soundly applying the Fiat--Shamir transform using
a hash function family that is correlation intractable for a
suitable class of relations. Previously, such hash families were based
either on ``exotic\u27\u27 assumptions (e.g., indistinguishability
obfuscation or optimal hardness of certain LWE variants) or, more
recently, on the existence of circularly secure fully homomorphic
encryption (FHE). However, none of these assumptions are known to be
implied by plain LWE or worst-case hardness.
Our main technical contribution is a hash family that is correlation
intractable for arbitrary size- circuits, for any polynomially
bounded , based on plain LWE (with small polynomial approximation
factors). The construction combines two novel ingredients: a
correlation-intractable hash family for log-depth circuits
based on LWE (or even the potentially harder Short Integer Solution
problem), and a ``bootstrapping\u27\u27 transform that uses (leveled) FHE to
promote correlation intractability for the FHE decryption circuit to
arbitrary (bounded) circuits. Our construction can be
instantiated in two possible ``modes,\u27\u27 yielding a NIZK that is either
computationally sound and statistically zero knowledge
in the common random string model, or vice-versa in the common
reference string model
Batch Verification for Statistical Zero Knowledge Proofs
A statistical zero-knowledge proof (SZK) for a problem enables a computationally unbounded prover to convince a polynomial-time verifier that without revealing any additional information about to the verifier, in a strong information-theoretic sense.
Suppose, however, that the prover wishes to convince the verifier that separate inputs all belong to (without revealing anything else). A naive way of doing so is to simply run the SZK protocol separately for each input. In this work we ask whether one can do better -- that is, is efficient batch verification possible for SZK?
We give a partial positive answer to this question by constructing a batch verification protocol for a natural and important subclass of SZK -- all problems that have a non-interactive SZK protocol (in the common random string model). More specifically, we show that, for every such problem , there exists an honest-verifier SZK protocol for batch verification of instances, with communication complexity , where refers to a fixed polynomial that depends only on (and not on ). This result should be contrasted with the naive solution, which has communication complexity .
Our proof leverages a new NISZK-complete problem, called Approximate Injectivity, that we find to be of independent interest. The goal in this problem is to distinguish circuits that are nearly injective, from those that are non-injective on almost all inputs
Efficient Lattice-Based Zero-Knowledge Arguments with Standard Soundness: Construction and Applications
We provide new zero-knowledge argument of knowledge systems that work directly for a wide class of language, namely, ones involving the satisfiability of matrix-vector relations and integer relations commonly found in constructions of lattice-based cryptography. Prior to this work, practical arguments for lattice-based relations either have a constant soundness error ( 2/3 ), or consider a weaker form of soundness, namely, extraction only guarantees that the prover is in possession of a witness that “approximates” the actual witness. Our systems do not suffer from these limitations.
The core of our new argument systems is an efficient zero-knowledge argument of knowledge of a solution to a system of linear equations, where variables of this solution satisfy a set of quadratic constraints. This argument enjoys standard soundness, a small soundness error ( 1/poly ), and a complexity linear in the size of the solution. Using our core argument system, we construct highly efficient argument systems for a variety of statements relevant to lattices, including linear equations with short solutions and matrix-vector relations with hidden matrices.
Based on our argument systems, we present several new constructions of common privacy-preserving primitives in the standard lattice setting, including a group signature, a ring signature, an electronic cash system, and a range proof protocol. Our new constructions are one to three orders of magnitude more efficient than the state of the art (in standard lattice). This illustrates the efficiency and expressiveness of our argument system
Multi-Theorem Preprocessing NIZKs from Lattices
Non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) proofs are fundamental to modern cryptography. Numerous NIZK constructions are known in both the random oracle and the common reference string (CRS) models. In the CRS model, there exist constructions from several classes of cryptographic assumptions such as trapdoor permutations, pairings, and indistinguishability obfuscation. Notably absent from this list, however, are constructions from standard lattice assumptions. While there has been partial progress in realizing NIZKs from lattices for specific languages, constructing NIZK proofs (and arguments) for all of NP from standard lattice assumptions remains open.
In this work, we make progress on this problem by giving the first construction of a multi-theorem NIZK for NP from standard lattice assumptions in the preprocessing model. In the preprocessing model, a (trusted) setup algorithm generates proving and verification keys. The proving key is needed to construct proofs and the verification key is needed to check proofs. In the multi-theorem setting, the proving and verification keys should be reusable for an unbounded number of theorems without compromising soundness or zero-knowledge. Existing constructions of NIZKs in the preprocessing model (or even the designated-verifier model) that rely on weaker assumptions like one-way functions or oblivious transfer are only secure in a single-theorem setting. Thus, constructing multi-theorem NIZKs in the preprocessing model does not seem to be inherently easier than constructing them in the CRS model.
We begin by constructing a multi-theorem preprocessing NIZK directly from context-hiding homomorphic signatures. Then, we show how to efficiently implement the preprocessing step using a new cryptographic primitive called blind homomorphic signatures. This primitive may be of independent interest. Finally, we show how to leverage our new lattice-based preprocessing NIZKs to obtain new malicious-secure MPC protocols purely from standard lattice assumptions
GGH15 Beyond Permutation Branching Programs: Proofs, Attacks, and Candidates
International audienc
GGH15 Beyond Permutation Branching Programs: Proofs, Attacks, and Candidates
© 2018, International Association for Cryptologic Research. We carry out a systematic study of the GGH15 graded encoding scheme used with general branching programs. This is motivated by the fact that general branching programs are more efficient than permutation branching programs and also substantially more expressive in the read-once setting. Our main results are as follows: Proofs. We present new constructions of private constrained PRFs and lockable obfuscation, for constraints (resp. functions to be obfuscated) that are computable by general branching programs. Our constructions are secure under LWE with subexponential approximation factors. Previous constructions of this kind crucially rely on the permutation structure of the underlying branching programs. Using general branching programs allows us to obtain more efficient constructions for certain classes of constraints (resp. functions), while posing new challenges in the proof, which we overcome using new proof techniques.Attacks. We extend the previous attacks on indistinguishability obfuscation (iO) candidates that use GGH15 encodings. The new attack simply uses the rank of a matrix as the distinguisher, so we call it a “rank attack”. The rank attack breaks, among others, the iO candidate for general read-once branching programs by Halevi, Halevi, Shoup and Stephens-Davidowitz (CCS 2017).Candidate Witness Encryption and iO. Drawing upon insights from our proofs and attacks, we present simple candidates for witness encryption and iO that resist the existing attacks, using GGH15 encodings. Our candidate for witness encryption crucially exploits the fact that formulas in conjunctive normal form (CNFs) can be represented by general, read-once branching programs