The macrophage inhibitory cytokine integrates AKT/PKB and MAP kinase signaling pathways in breast cancer cells

Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1), a divergent member of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily, plays a role in the progression of a number of cancers, including breast, gastric, prostate and colorectal carcinomas. Serum MIC-1 levels are elevated in patients with metastatic prostate, breast and colorectal carcinomas. In vitro studies have revealed a cell type-specific role for MIC-1 in senescence and apoptosis. MIC-1 activates the survival kinase AKT/PKB in neuronal cells. Depending on the cell type, it activates or represses the MAP kinases ERK1/2. Mechanisms responsible for an increased MIC-1 expression in cancers and the consequences of MIC-1 overexpression, however, are not known. In this study, we show that AKT/PKB directly regulates the expression of MIC-1 in breast cancer cells. Sequences within −88 to +30 of the MIC-1 promoter are required for the AKT-mediated induction of MIC-1. This region of the promoter contains two SP-1 binding sites (SP-1B and SP-1C), which bind to the SP-1 and SP-3 proteins. Mutation of SP-1C but not SP-1B reduced the AKT-mediated activation of MIC-1. MIC-1 increased the basal ERK1 phosphorylation and prolonged the estrogen-stimulated ERK1 phosphorylation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells without altering the phosphorylation status of AKT/PKB. Immunohistochemistry with MIC-1 antibody revealed an MIC-1 expression within the cancer cells of primary breast cancer and in the MCF-7 xenografts. Furthermore, a limited analysis of RNA from primary breast cancers revealed an overexpression of MIC-1 in tumors, compared with normal tissues. These results suggest that AKT/PKB through MIC-1 could regulate the ERK1 activity and the MIC-1 expression levels may serve as a surrogate marker for the AKT activation in tumors

Differential gene expression profiling of esophageal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundDifferential gene expression offers an attractive means by which to study genes that may be involved in disease development and/or progression. We performed quantitative gene expression in various stages of esophageal adenocarcinoma, treated exclusively by surgery with complete 2-field lymphadenectomy, in an attempt to discern genes involved in disease progression as well as genes that may predict survival.MethodsGene expression profiling was accomplished by cDNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension, and ligation (DASL) assay. RNA was extracted from 89 archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded esophageal adenocarcinoma tissues. DASL assay was performed with the Sentrix Universal Array (Illumina Corp, San Diego, Calif) of 502 known cancer-related genes. Bioinformatics tools were used to determine significant differential gene expression in T1-2 versus T3-4 tumors and tumors without lymph node involvement (N0) versus tumors with lymph node involvement (N+). Gene expression was also correlated with overall survival.ResultsTwenty-one genes were overexpressed in T1-2 compared with T3-4 tumors (false discovery rate of 0). Underexpression of 1 gene was seen in N+ compared with N0 tumors (false discovery rate of 0). For overall survival, underexpression of 9 genes correlated with long survival.ConclusionsUsing differential gene expression of 502 known cancer genes, we identified genes that may be involved at various stages in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We also identified genes that may correlate with prolonged survival and, thus, may serve as prognostic markers. These findings may provide further insight into the mechanisms of development and/or progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prospective studies are needed to verify the prognostic value of these genes