Intra-arterial cisplatin for the treatment of malignant gliomas

Cisplatin (DDP) is a chemotherapeutic agent that has shown efficacy against primary CNS malignancies. Intraarterial (IA) administration of DDP to patients with brain tumors should produce higher peak levels of drug than intravenous (IV) administration of an identical dose and reduce systemic toxicity. Twelve patients with malignant glioma were entered into the study. All had failed irradiation, 11 had failed IA BCNU. Each patient received IA DDP, 58–100 mg/m 2 , into the internal carotid artery at four to six week intervals. One of 12 patients had a partial response of 6 months. The remaining 11 patients had progressive disease [10] or severe complications [1]. Toxicity included seizures in four patients, weakness and/or aphasia in four patients, coma in two patients, and visual deterioration in two patients. IA DDP has very limited efficacy in patients with malignant gliomas after failure of nitrosoureas and is associated with an unacceptable level of toxicity. IA DDP may be more effective when used as initial chemotherapy of malignant gliomas.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45394/1/11060_2004_Article_BF00149377.pd

Comparison between BCNU and procarbazine chemotherapy for treatment of gliomas

We compared sequential single-agent BCNU and procarbazine (PCB) chemotherapy in 31 patients with gliomas [grade IV (10), grade III (15), grade II (6)]. Patients had failed surgical biopsy ± resection and radiation therapy. All patients were treated initially with BCNU 150-300mg/m 2 by intra-arterial or intravenous route every 6 weeks. After CT evidence of tumor progression, all patients received PCB 150mg/m 2 /day for 28 days every 8 weeks. Patient responses to BCNU were CR (0), PR (7), SD (12), progression (12), and to PCB CR (2), PR (9), SD (6), and progression (14). Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time to failure for all patients were shorter for BCNU, 5.0 months (range 1.5–20), than for PCB, 6.0 months (range 2–50+). There was a statistically significant difference (Mantel-Cox test, p=0.02) in the distribution of time to disease progression between the two drugs, especially for grade III tumors (p= 0.02). The cumulative proportion of patients without disease progression at 6 months was 26% while on BCNU, compared to 48% while on PCB; at 12 months the cumulative proportions were 3% for BCNU compared to 35% for PCB. Although there was no formal washout period between administration of the two drugs, no carryover effect was evident. These data provide further evidence that PCB has significant activity against malignant glioma and may, in fact, be more effective than BCNU.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45377/1/11060_2005_Article_BF01050072.pd

Use of Implantable Pump Systems for Intraarterial, Intraventricular and Intratumoral Treatment of Malignant Brain Tumors

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71435/1/j.1749-6632.1988.tb31829.x.pd