Diagnosis and assessment of systemic vasculitis.

The diagnosis of systemic vasculitis requires clinical evidence with appropriate symptoms and physical signs, supported by histological or radiological confirmation. Earlier recognition of these diseases has been facilitated by a greater awareness of their incidence, and also by the more widespread introduction of the anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) test. Early diagnosis provides a greater potential for effective intervention in the course of disease and this may limit subsequent damage. However, an early diagnosis poses the more difficult challenge in the classification of the vasculitides, since traditional classification systems have depended on the presence of well-established manifestations of the disease. The accurate assessment of disease activity and damage in vasculitis has become necessary as a result of significant improvements in survival with the use of chemotherapy. The disease course however is frequently characterised by relapse as well as the scars of irreversible organ damage from disease and drug toxicity. Clinical methods of assessment are simple to apply, reliable and often more effective than any current laboratory test in evaluating the effects of therapy and determining changes in therapy. The increasing use of surrogate clinical measures of disease should provide a greater opportunity to establish the effectiveness of existing and novel therapies in the management of these complex diseases

Rheumatoid constrictive pericarditis.

A 73-yr-old woman with a 4 yr history of rheumatoid arthritis presented with the clinical features of congestive cardiac failure. She had a good early response to standard therapy although she subsequently developed recurrent biventricular failure. The preservation of good ventricular function on echocardiography in the face of clinical evidence of myocardial insufficiency raised the possibility of constrictive pericarditis, which was confirmed on cardiac catheterization. Constrictive pericarditis should be considered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who develop unexplained cardiac failure. Early diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion and cardiac catheterization may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Medical treatment is largely ineffective and pericardiectomy should be considered

Rheumatoid constrictive pericarditis.

A 73-yr-old woman with a 4 yr history of rheumatoid arthritis presented with the clinical features of congestive cardiac failure. She had a good early response to standard therapy although she subsequently developed recurrent biventricular failure. The preservation of good ventricular function on echocardiography in the face of clinical evidence of myocardial insufficiency raised the possibility of constrictive pericarditis, which was confirmed on cardiac catheterization. Constrictive pericarditis should be considered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who develop unexplained cardiac failure. Early diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion and cardiac catheterization may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Medical treatment is largely ineffective and pericardiectomy should be considered

The diagnostic value of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody testing in a routine clinical setting.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) tests are a routine clinical assay in most UK hospitals. We examined the role of routine ANCA testing in achieving a diagnosis of systemic vasculitis in a routine clinical setting. From April 1996 to March 2000, 2734 samples from five hospital departments were tested for ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) at a single laboratory. After April 1999, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed on all IIF-positive samples. Clinical diagnosis was determined for all patients with a positive IIF ANCA, and a sample of the ANCA-negative patients. Some 2-18% of patients with suspected ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV) had positive IIF ANCA. The AASV diagnosis was confirmed in 0-56% of these cases. Analysis by department suggested that 88-100% of patients with a positive IIF ANCA did not have AASV, except in the Rheumatology department. The positive predictive value (PPV) of IIF ANCA for AASV was 59% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 84%. Of the patients with proven AASV, 41% did not have ANCA on IIF. Combined ANCA testing by IIF/ELISA had a higher sensitivity and PPV but lower specificity than IIF alone for AASV. For the combined IIF/ELISA test, only the Rheumatology department had a sensitivity or PPV >0% for AASV. The PPV of ANCA by IIF/ELISA for AASV was 79% and the NPV was 63%. The ANCA test is being widely applied with very poor return. Guidelines for more effective usage are proposed