Measuring the quality and quantity of professional intrapartum support: Testing a computerised systematic observation tool in the clinical setting

Background: Continuous support in labour has a significant impact on a range of clinical outcomes, though whether the quality and quantity of support behaviours affects the strength of this impact has not yet been established. To identify the quality and quantity of support, a reliable means of measurement is needed. To this end, a new computerised systematic observation tool, the ‘SMILI' (Supportive Midwifery in Labour Instrument) was developed. The aim of the study was to test the validity and usability of the ‘Supportive Midwifery in Labour Instrument' (SMILI) and to test the feasibility and acceptability of the systematic observation approach in the clinical intrapartum setting. Methods: Systematic observation was combined with a postnatal questionnaire and the collection of data about clinical processes and outcomes for each observed labour. The setting for the study was four National Health Service maternity units in Scotland, UK. Participants in this study were forty five midwives and forty four women. The SMILI was used by trained midwife observers to record labour care provided by midwives. Observations were undertaken for an average of two hours and seventeen minutes during the active first stage of labour and, in 18 cases, the observation included the second stage of labour. Content validity of the instrument was tested by the observers, noting the extent to which the SMILI facilitated the recording of all key aspects of labour care and interactions. Construct validity was tested through exploration of correlations between the data recorded and women's feelings about the support they received. Feasibility and usability data were recorded following each observation by the observer. Internal reliability and construct validity were tested through statistical analysis of the data. Results: One hundred and four hours of labour care were observed and recorded using the SMILI during forty nine labour episodes. Conclusion: The SMILI was found to be a valid and reliable instrument in the intrapartum setting in which it was tested. The study identified that the SMILI could be used to test correlations between the quantity and quality of support and outcomes. The systematic observational approach was found to be an acceptable and feasible method of enquiry

Iron status in early infancy is associated with trajectories of cognitive development up to pre-school age in rural Gambia.

INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency is among the leading risk factors for poor cognitive development. However, interventions targeting iron deficiency have had mixed results on cognitive outcomes. This may be due to previous interventions focusing on the correction of iron deficiency anaemia in late infancy and early childhood, at which point long lasting neural impacts may already be established. We hypothesise that the relationship between iron status and cognitive development will be observable in the first months of life and will not be recovered by 5 years of age. METHODS: Using data from the Brain Imaging for Global Health (BRIGHT) Study in Gambia (n = 179), we conducted mixed effects modelling to assess the relationship between iron status at 5 months of age and trajectories of cognitive development from 5 months- 5 years using (i) a standardised measure of cognitive development (Mullen Scales of Early Learning) and (ii) an eye-tracking assessment of attention processing (visual disengagement time). RESULTS: All infants were iron sufficient at 1 month of age. At 5 and 12 months of age 30% and 55% of infants were iron deficient respectively. In fully adjusted analyses, infants in the lowest tercile of soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) (best iron status) achieved MSEL Cognitive Scores on average 1.9 points higher than infants in the highest sTfR tercile (p = 0.009, effect size = 0.48). There was no evidence that this group difference was recovered by 5 years of age. Infants in the lowest sTfR tercile had visual disengagement time 57ms faster than the highest tercile (p = 0.001, effect size = 0.59). However, this difference diminished by early childhood (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Infants are at risk of iron deficiency in early infancy. A relationship between iron status and cognitive development is apparent from 5 months of age and remains observable at 5 years of age. One mechanism by which iron availability in early infancy impacts brain development may be through effects on early attentional processing, which is rapidly developing and has substantial nutritional requirements during this period. To support neurocognitive development, prevention of iron deficiency in pre- and early postnatal life may be more effective than correcting iron deficiency once already established