Poor glycemic control in bariatric patients: a reason to delay or a reason to proceed?

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have obesity, and over 85% of diabetic patients who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) will see improvement or resolution of diabetes. However, diabetes is a known risk factor for surgical complications. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether poor preoperative glycemic control confers an increased perioperative risk after MBS. SETTING: Academic Hospital. METHODS: Retrospective review of data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). From the 2017-2018 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients with diabetes who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or gastric sleeve surgery. Unmatched and propensity-matched univariate analyses, as well as multivariate logistic regressions, were performed to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes and complication rates between patients with poor (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1C] \u3e 7.0) and good (HbA1C ≤ 7.0) glycemic control. RESULTS: Of 40,132 T2D patients, 19,094 (52.42%) had an HbA1C level ≤ 7.0. Patients with poor glycemic control had slightly higher rates of overall morbidity (6.53% versus 5.49%, respectively; relative risk = 1.188; P \u3c .001). However, in a 1:1 matched analysis of 23,930 patients controlling for body mass index, surgery type, approach, and co-morbidities, the findings of poorer outcomes were largely mitigated. In a multivariate analysis, poor glycemic control was not associated with morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In T2D patients, poor glycemic control does not independently increase the risk of 30-day morbidity following MBS. Adverse outcomes in the setting of poor glycemic control appear to be largely mediated by associated co-morbidities. Performing MBS in the setting of suboptimal glycemic control may be justified, with the understanding that delaying or refusing surgery can contribute to worsening of diabetes-related co-morbidities that, in turn, may ultimately have a more deleterious effect on outcomes

Why comprehensive adoption of robotic assisted thoracic surgery is ideal for both simple and complex lung resections.

Minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical techniques have grown increasingly popular due to improved outcome measures compared to conventional rib-spreading thoracotomy. However, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) presents with unique technical challenges that have limited its role in certain cases. Here, we discuss our perspectives on the implementation of a successful robotic thoracic program. We will then present the case for how the adoption of robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) provides the benefits of minimally invasive VATS while still retaining the technical finesse of bimanual articulating instruments and 3-dimensional imaging that is a universal component of any open surgery. We will also discuss how to overcome some of the perceived disadvantages to RATS in regard to the higher cost, lack of tactile feedback and potential safety concerns

Racial disparities in bariatric perioperative outcomes among the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery outcomes in elderly patients have been shown to be safe, but with a higher rate of adverse outcomes compared with nonelderly patients. The impact of race on bariatric surgery outcomes continues to be explored, with recent studies showing higher rates of adverse outcomes in black patients. Perioperative outcomes in racial cohorts of elderly bariatric patients are largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare outcomes between elderly non-Hispanic black (NHB) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) bariatric surgery patients to determine whether outcomes are mediated by race. SETTING: Academic hospital. METHODS: Patients who had a primary Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in the period 2015-2018 and were at least 65 years of age were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File (MBSAQIP PUF). Selected cases were stratified by race. Outcomes were compared between matched racial cohorts. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine whether race independently predicted morbidity. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2018, 29,394 elderly NHW (90.8%) and NHB (9.2%) patients underwent an RYGB or SG. At baseline, NHB elderly patients had a higher burden of co-morbid conditions, resulting in higher rates of overall (7.7% versus 6.4%, P = .009) and bariatric-related (5.4% versus 4.1%, P = .001) morbidity. All outcome measures were similar between propensity-score-matched racial elderly bariatric patient cohorts. On regression analysis, NHB race remained independently correlated with morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.08-1.47, P = .003). CONCLUSION: RYGB and SG are safe in elderly patient cohorts, with no differences in adverse outcomes between NHB and NHW patients, accounting for confounding factors. While race does not appear to impact outcomes in the elderly cohorts, NHB race may play a role in access

Perioperative outcomes of bariatric surgery in the setting of chronic steroid use: an MBSAQIP database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic steroids are a treatment option for many chronic diseases but predispose patients to both weight gain and surgical complications. They therefore represent a unique interface between obesity, chronic disease, and surgical risk. As the benefits of bariatric surgery for controlling metabolic disease become more apparent, patients with chronic illnesses on corticosteroids are increasingly being referred for surgery despite an unclear safety profile. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database represents the largest bariatric-specific clinical data set for comparing outcomes in this complex patient population. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes following bariatric surgery in the setting of chronic steroid/immunosuppression. SETTING: University Hospital, United States. METHODS: Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program MBSAQIP database, we identified patients on chronic corticosteroids who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic gastric bypass in 2015 or 2016. Unmatched as well as propensity-score and case-controlled matched cohort analyses were performed of patients on corticosteroid therapy compared with those without. RESULTS: Of the 302,140 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic gastric bypass in 2015-2016, a total of 4947 (1.63%) were on chronic steroids/immunosuppressive drugs. Patients using steroids were older with significantly higher rates of co-morbid conditions. Hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, reoperation, readmission, bleeding, leak, and infectious complications were significantly higher in steroid users; however, in a propensity and case-control matched analysis of 8710 patients and 6598 patients, respectively, steroids were not found to be independent risk factors for poorer outcomes except for an increased rate of leak. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, steroid use does not independently predict poorer outcomes among bariatric surgery patients except for an increased leak rate. With appropriate patient selection based on associated co-morbid factors, primary bariatric surgery is safe in patients using corticosteroids, with an acceptable 30-day postoperative risk profile

Comparison of eGFR formulas in determining chronic kidney disease stage in bariatric patients and the impact on perioperative outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) independently increases the risk of 30-day adverse outcomes following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). However, no studies have evaluated the stage of CKD at which increased perioperative risk is manifested. Here, we correlate 30-day major morbidities after MBS with extent of renal disease based on CKD Stage. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of CKD stage on perioperative outcomes after bariatric surgery. SETTING: Academic Hospital. METHODS: From the 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database, we identified patients with CKD who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) were calculated and cohorts were generated based on CKD Stage. Complication rates and rates of morbidity and mortality were compared between stages, and strengths of correlation were calculated. RESULTS: GFR and CKD Stage were calculated for 150,283 patients. There was a significant increase in the risk of major morbidity at each progressive stage of CKD (P \u3c .001 for all compared stages). There was a strong positive linear correlation between increasing CKD Stage and total morbidity (r CONCLUSION: An increased risk of perioperative complications may be seen in early stages of CKD, and risk is compounded in more advanced stages. Bariatric surgical candidates should be counseled on their increased risk of surgical complications even with mild CKD, and the benefits of bariatric surgery should be carefully weighed against significantly increased risks of complications in severe CKD

The impact of chronic kidney disease on bariatric perioperative outcome: a MBSAQIP matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is considered a strong independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD), and bariatric surgery remains the most effective treatment for obesity-related co-morbidities. Previous large database analyses have suggested that CKD does not independently increase the risk of adverse outcomes after bariatric surgery. The safety of elective bariatric surgery in this patient population remains unclear. To this end, we compared 30-day outcomes in this patient population after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. OBJECTIVES: To compare 30-day outcomes in CKD patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass. SETTING: University Hospital, United States. METHODS: Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database, we identified patients with CKD who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 2015 or 2016. An unmatched cohort analysis, a propensity-matched analysis, and a case-control, matched-cohort analysis was performed of patients with and without CKD. RESULTS: Of the 302,092 patients included in this study, 2362 (.7%) had CKD, of whom 837 (35.4%) required dialysis. CKD patients were older with significantly higher rates of co-morbid conditions. Hospital length of stay, intensive care unit admission, reoperation, readmission, bleeding, cardiopulmonary, infectious complications, and total morbidity were significantly higher in CKD patients. In propensity-matched and case-control matched analyses of 4006 patients and 2264 patients, respectively, poorer outcomes in CKD patients highlight it an independent risk factor for morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previously reported large database analysis, CKD and dependence on dialysis independently increases the risk of 30-day adverse outcomes after primary bariatric surgery. The benefits conferred by bariatric surgery should be carefully weighed against the increased risk of complications in this challenging population

Does Steroid Use in Transplant Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery Independently Impact Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppression in patients after solid organ transplantation. Due to deleterious effects, there is a push to minimize steroid use. The impact of corticosteroid use on prior solid organ transplant patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine if corticosteroid use independently impacts surgical outcomes after MBS in solid organ transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Project Participant Use File database. Patients with a history of solid organ transplantation were identified and further stratified by corticosteroid use. Univariable and multivariable regression for multiple postoperative outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Overall findings are summarized in visual abstract. Of 382 prior solid organ transplant patients, 42% (n = 160) were on corticosteroids. Patients on corticosteroids had significantly higher overall morbidity (16% versus 9%, P \u3c 0.05). After multivariable analysis, corticosteroid use had a two-fold increase in overall morbidity (odds ratio 2.05, P = 0.0034) but without an increased risk for overall morbidity related to MBS (odds ratio 2.06, P = 0.061). CONCLUSIONS: Solid organ transplant patients undergoing MBS on corticosteroids have a significantly increased rate of overall morbidity (P \u3c 0.05) but not morbidity related to bariatric surgery

Variations in bariatric surgical practice patterns between general and bariatric surgeons: a matched analysis of the 2017 MBSAQIP database.

BACKGROUND: While general surgeons (GSs) perform metabolic and bariatric surgery (MABS), these procedures are increasingly performed by metabolic and bariatric surgeons (MBSs). Because MABS is an evolving practice with changing surgical platforms and approaches, it is important to evaluate outcomes between different specialists performing these procedures. OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative practice pattern variations and outcomes of MABS performed by GSs versus MBSs. SETTING: University Hospital, United States. METHODS: Using the 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, we identified Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) cases and stratified them by specialization (GSs versus MBSs). Patient characteristics, practice patterns and outcomes, complications, and 30-day outcomes were compared between cohorts. Matched procedure-specific analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 172,430 MABS procedures, 4394 (2.5%) were performed by GSs and 168,036 (97.4%) by MBSs. At baseline, patients of GSs had fewer co-morbidities. GSs more commonly used the robotic platform for SG cases and performed interventions such as staple line reinforcement and staple line check with provocative testing. MBSs more commonly performed robotic (versus laparoscopic) RYGB. Overall complications were low in both study cohorts. After propensity matching, transfusion and venous thromboembolism were higher in SG performed by GSs, while surgical site infection was higher in SG and RYGB performed by MBSs. These findings were not reproduced after case-control matching. In matched analyses, there were no mortality or morbidity differences between study cohorts. CONCLUSION: MABS is performed safely by both GSs and MBSs, with no difference in morbidity and mortality

Syncope workup: Greater yield in select trauma population.

BACKGROUND: There is great variation in practice regarding the assessment of trauma patients who present with syncope. The purpose of this study was to determine the yield of screening studies (electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and carotid duplex) and define characteristics to identify groups that may benefit from these investigations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients from 2003 to 2015 who received a carotid duplex as part of a syncope evaluation at our urban Level 1 Trauma Center. Demographics, clinical findings as well as interventions undertaken (ie: placement of defibrillators/pacemakers) as a result of the syncope evaluation were collected. Data analysis was performed with STATA 14 and relationships between comorbidities, positive findings and interventions were assessed. Significance was assumed for p \u3c 0.05. RESULTS: 736 trauma patients were included in the study. The most common mechanism of injury was fall (592, 82%). A history of congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or coronary artery disease (CAD) and age ≥ 65 were significantly associated with abnormal ECG and ECHO findings, but not with severe carotid stenosis. Elevated Injury Severity Scale (ISS) was significantly associated with an abnormal ECHO on both univariate and multivariate analysis. An abnormal ECG was predictive of an abnormal ECHO (p = 0.02). Ten patients (1.4%) underwent placement of a defibrillator and/or pacemaker, all of whom reported having CHF. Only 11 patients (1.7%) had severe carotid stenosis (\u3e70%) requiring intervention. CONCLUSION: The screening studies used in a syncope evaluation have low yield in the general trauma population. Carotid duplex should not be routinely performed. Cardiac evaluation should be tailored to individuals with cardiac comorbidities, older age and elevated ISS. An ECG should be used as initial screening in this patient cohort

Bariatric Surgery in Prior Solid Organ Transplantation Patients: Is Race a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes?

PURPOSE: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasingly performed in patients with previous solid organ transplantation (PSOT). In addition, controversy remains about whether racial disparity in outcomes following MBS exists. Therefore, the aim of this analysis was to determine if race independently predicts outcomes in MBS patients with PSOT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with PSOT undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were identified in the 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database. Patients were stratified by race (Black and White). Propensity score matching was utilized to adjust for multiple demographic variables. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for overall and bariatric-related morbidity. RESULTS: Of 335 MBS patients with PSOT, 250 (75%) were white and 85 (25%) were black patents. Procedure-type and surgical approach (p \u3e 0.1) were similarly distributed. Black patients were more likely (p \u3c 0.05) to have hypertension dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease, and be on chronic steroids). Mortality and morbidity were similar. Black patients had significantly (p \u3c 0.05) higher rates of renal failure, pulmonary complications, and emergency department visits in unmatched analysis. After propensity score matching, 82 patients in each cohort were identified and were similar at baseline (p \u3e 0.5). In the matched analysis, black patients had higher overall (17% vs. 10%, p = 0.12) and bariatric-related morbidity (14% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.05). In addition, black patients had significantly (p \u3c 0.05) higher rates of postoperative pneumonias, progressive renal insufficiency, and emergency department visits. On multivariable regression analysis, black race did not independently predict overall or bariatric-related morbidity. CONCLUSION: MBS in racial cohorts with PSOT is safe, with very low rates of overall morbidity and mortality. Black race trended toward increased postoperative morbidity. Larger cohort studies are needed to validate our findings