Pretreatment Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Biomarker for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior to Radical Cystectomy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Objectives : To evaluate the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy and to identify patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy and predictors of therapeutic response to it. Methods : In this prospective study, we enrolled 37 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (cT2-4aNanyM0). The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate at cystectomy after receiving neoadjuvant GC chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine predictive factors of pT0N0 and ≦pT1N0. The secondary endpoints were adverse events during chemotherapy, surgical complications, as well as overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival. Results : A mean of 2.7 cycles of neoadjuvant GC was administered. Pathological complete response (pT0N0), partial response (pTisN0/pT1N0), and pathological response (≦pT1N0) rates were 24.3%, 27.0%, and 5l.3%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic adverse events were rare. Three-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 70.7%, 8l.3%, and 63.9%, respectively. Patients with pathological response (≦pT1N0) demonstrated a significantly improved 3-year overall survival rate (94.7% vs. 42.8%), disease-specific survival rate (94.7% vs.62.9%), and recurrence-free survival rate (80.6% vs.45.5%), compared with pathological non-responders (≦pT2Nany). Clinical stage cT2 and low pre-chemotherapy platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios were significant indicators of favorable pathological response to neoadjuvant Gc. Conclusions : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using GC is safe and effective in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Pretreatment clinical T2 stage and low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios were predictive markers for successful neoadjuvant treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with GC

The primary therapy chosen for patients with localized prostate cancer between the university hospital and its affiliated hospitals in Nara Uro-oncological research group registration

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We investigated the differences between the preferential primary therapy conceived by the primary doctors and the primary therapy actually conducted for prostate cancer patients in Nara, Japan.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The distribution of primary therapy and clinical characteristics of 2303 prostate cancer patients - diagnosed between 2004 and 2006 at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals - were assessed. Moreover, the preferential primary therapy for the patients at each clinical stage (cT1-T3bN0M0) conceived by the primary doctors was investigated and compared to the actual therapy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of all patients, 51% received primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT), 30% underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), and 14% received radiation therapy (RT). The preferential primary therapy for cT1-2N0M0 was RP (92%) while 38% of the patients actually received PADT (RP: 40%). For cT3aN0M0, the preferential primary therapy was both RP and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) while 58% of the patients actually received PADT (RP: 16%, EBRT: 24%). For cT3bN0M0, the most preferential primary therapy was EBRT (46%) while 67% of the patients actually received PADT (EBRT: 21%). This trend was more notable in the affiliated hospitals than in the University hospital. The hospitals with lower volume of RP per year significantly conducted PADT compared with those with higher volume of RP.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>PADT was commonly used to treat localized prostate cancer as well as locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan. There was a definite discrepancy between the preferential primary therapy conceived by the primary doctors and the actual therapy provided to the patients.</p