Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

Validity and reliability of a new whole room indirect calorimeter to assess metabolic response to small calorie loads.

We overview of our whole room indirect calorimeter (WRIC), demonstrate validity and reliability of our WRIC, and explore a novel application of Bayesian hierarchical modeling to assess responses to small carbohydrate loads. To assess WRIC validity seven gas infusion studies were performed using a gas blender and profiles designed to mimic resting and postprandial metabolic events. Sixteen participants underwent fasting and postprandial measurements, during which they consumed a 75-kcal drink containing sucrose, dextrose, or fructose in a crossover design. Linear mixed effects models were used to compare resting and postprandial metabolic rate (MR) and carbohydrate oxidation. Postprandial carbohydrate oxidation trajectories for each participant and condition were modeled using Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling. Mean total error in infusions were 1.27 ± 0.67% and 0.42 ± 0.70% for VO2 and VCO2 respectively, indicating a high level of validity. Mean resting MR was similar across conditions ([Formula: see text] = 1.05 ± 0.03 kcal/min, p = 0.82, ICC: 0.91). While MR increased similarly among all conditions (~13%, p = 0.29), postprandial carbohydrate oxidation parameters were significantly lower for dextrose compared with sucrose or fructose. We provide evidence validating our WRIC and a novel application of statistical methods useful for research using WRIC

Resist diabetes: A randomized clinical trial for resistance training maintenance in adults with prediabetes

<div><p>Objective</p><p>To determine whether a social cognitive theory (SCT)-based intervention improves resistance training (RT) maintenance and strength, and reduces prediabetes prevalence.</p><p>Research design and methods</p><p>Sedentary, overweight/obese (BMI: 25–39.9 kg/m²) adults aged 50–69 (N = 170) with prediabetes participated in the 15-month trial. Participants completed a supervised 3-month RT (2×/wk) phase and were randomly assigned (N = 159) to one of two 6-month maintenance conditions: SCT or standard care. Participants continued RT at a self-selected facility. The final 6-month period involved no contact. Assessments occurred at baseline and months 3, 9, and 15. The SCT faded-contact intervention consisted of nine tailored transition (i.e., supervised training to training alone) and nine follow-up sessions. Standard care involved six generic follow-up sessions. Primary outcomes were prevalence of normoglycemia and muscular strength.</p><p>Results</p><p>The retention rate was 76%. Four serious adverse events were reported. After 3 months of RT, 34% of participants were no longer prediabetic. This prevalence of normoglycemia was maintained through month 15 (30%), with no group difference. There was an 18% increase in the odds of being normoglycemic for each % increase in fat-free mass. Increases in muscular strength were evident at month 3 and maintained through month 15 (P<0.001), which represented improvements of 21% and 14% for chest and leg press, respectively. Results did not demonstrate a greater reduction in prediabetes prevalence in the SCT condition.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Resistance training is an effective, maintainable strategy for reducing prediabetes prevalence and increasing muscular strength. Future research which promotes RT initiation and maintenance in clinical and community settings is warranted.</p><p>Trial Registration</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov <a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01112709" target="_blank">NCT01112709</a>.</p></div

Adverse Events.

<p>Adverse Events.</p

Changes in diabetes-related outcomes, strength, body weight and composition, blood pressure, physical activity and dietary intake during the 15-month Resist Diabetes trial.^A

<p>Changes in diabetes-related outcomes, strength, body weight and composition, blood pressure, physical activity and dietary intake during the 15-month Resist Diabetes trial.<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0172610#t002fn002" target="_blank">^A</a></p

Resist Diabetes study consort diagram.

<p>Abbreviations: RT = resistance training; 3M = 3-month; SCT = social cognitive theory group; 9M = 9-month; 15M = 15-month; ITT = intent-to-treat.</p

Resist Diabetes: Participant characteristics at Baseline and at Randomization (Month 3).

<p>Resist Diabetes: Participant characteristics at Baseline and at Randomization (Month 3).</p