Ultrasound in the Assessment of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Connective Tissue Disorders: Correlation with High-Resolution Computed Tomography

Objective.To investigate the correlation between ultrasound (US) B-lines and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings in the assessment of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD).Methods.Thirty-four patients with a diagnosis of CTD were included. Each patient underwent clinical examination, pulmonary function test (PFT), chest HRCT, and lung US by an experienced radiologist or rheumatologist. A second rheumatologist carried out US examinations to assess interobserver agreement. In each patient, US B-line lung assessment including 50 intercostal spaces (IS) was performed. For the anterior and lateral chest, the IS were the second to the fifth along the parasternal, mid-clavicular, anterior axillary, and medial axillary lines (the left fifth IS of the anterior and lateral chest was not performed because of the presence of the heart, which limits lung visualization). For the posterior chest, the IS assessed were the seventh to the eighth along the posterior-axillary and subscapular lines. The second to eighth IS were assessed in the paravertebral line. In each IS, the number of US B-lines under the transducer was recorded, summed, and graded according to the following semiquantitative scoring: grade 0 = normal ( 50 B-lines).Results.A total of 1700 IS in 34 patients were assessed. A significant linear correlation was found between the US score and the HRCT score (p < 0.001; correlation coefficient ρ = 0.875). A positive correlation was found between US B-line assessments and values of DLCO (p = 0.014). Both κ values and overall percentages of interobserver agreement showed excellent agreement.Conclusion.Our study demonstrates that US B-line assessment may be a useful and reliable additional imaging method in the evaluation of PF in patients with CTD

Utility of a simplified ultrasound assessment to assess interstitial pulmonary fibrosis in connective tissue disorders - preliminary results

Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a frequent manifestation in patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD). Recently the ultrasound (US) criterion validity for its assessment has been proposed; however, the US scoring systems adopted include the study of several lung intercostal spaces (LIS), which could be time-consuming in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of a simplified US B-lines scoring system compared with both the US comprehensive assessment and the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings of IPF in CTD patients. METHODS:Thirty-six patients with a diagnosis of CTD were enrolled. Each patient underwent chest HRCT and lung US by an experienced radiologist and rheumatologist, respectively. Both comprehensive and simplified US B-lines assessments were scanned. The comprehensive US assessment was performed at 50 LIS level, whereas the simplified US assessment included bilaterally 14 LIS; for the anterior chest: the second LIS along the para-sternal lines, the fourth LIS along the mid-clavear, anterior axillary and mid-axillary lines; for the posterior chest: the eighth LIS along the paravertebral, sub-scapular and posterior axillary lines. For criterion validity, HRCT was considered the gold standard. Feasibility, inter and intra-observer reliability was also investigated. RESULTS: A highly significant correlation between comprehensive and simplified US assessment was found (P = 0.0001). A significant correlation was also found between the simplified US assessment and HRCT findings (P = 0.0006). Kappa values for the inter-observer simplified US assessment were in a range from 0.769 to 0.885, whereas the concordance correlation coefficient values for the intra-observer were from 0.856 to 0.955. There was a relevant difference in time spent on comprehensive (mean 23.3 ± SD 4.5 minutes) with respect to the simplified US assessment (mean 8.6 ± SD 1.4) (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS:Our results provide a new working hypothesis in favor of the utility of a simplified US B-lines assessment as an adjunct method to assess IPF in patients with CTD

The role of ultrasound in systemic sclerosis: On the cutting edge to foster clinical and research advancement

Abstract Ultrasound has been widely explored in systemic sclerosis in the clinical and research settings. Ultrasound allows a non-invasive and ionising radiation-free ‘window’ into this complex disease and is well-suited to repeated examinations. Ultrasound provides novel insights into the pathogenesis and measurement of disease in systemic sclerosis, including early (preclinical) internal organ involvement. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of ultrasound to foster clinical and research advancements in systemic sclerosis relating to (1) musculoskeletal, (2) digital ulcer, (3) lung disease and (4) skin disease. We also highlight unmet needs which much be addressed for ultrasound to assume a central role in systemic sclerosis clinical care and research

OMERACT Definitions for Ultrasonographic Pathology and Elementary Lesions Of Rheumatic Disorders Fifteen Years On

Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound (US) working group (WG) operates research activities for the validation of US as an outcome measurement instrument according to the Filter 2.0 framework Methods. From the onset of the WG research in 2005 through now, original publications on definitions and scoring systems for pathophysiological manifestations and elementary lesions of various rheumatic disorders were reviewed Results. Definitions and scoring systems according to new terminology are provided Conclusions. We have redefined OMERACT definitions of US pathology and elementary lesions as well as scoring systems which are now proposed for OMERACT approval for application in clinical trial

A sonographic spectrum of psoriatic arthritis: “the five targets”

Ultrasound is a rapidly evolving technique that is gaining an increasing success in the assessment of psoriatic arthritis. Most of the studies have been aimed at investigating its ability in the assessment of joints, tendons, and entheses in psoriatic arthritis patients. Less attention has been paid to demonstrate the potential of ultrasound in the evaluation of skin and nail. The aim of this pictorial essay was to show the main high-frequency grayscale and power Doppler ultrasound findings in patients with psoriatic arthritis at joint, tendon, enthesis, skin, and nail level

Ultrasound definition of tendon damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a OMERACT consensus-based ultrasound score focussing on the diagnostic reliability

Methods: We conducted a Delphi study on ultrasounddefined tendon damage and ultrasound scoring system of tendon damage in RA among 35 international rheumatologists with experience in musculoskeletal ultrasound. Twelve patients with RA were included and assessed twice by 12 rheumatologists-sonographers. Ultrasound examination for tendon damage in B mode of five wrist extensor compartments (extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus; extensor pollicis longus; extensor digitorum communis; extensor digiti minimi; extensor carpi ulnaris) and one ankle tendon (tibialis posterior) was performed blindly, independently and bilaterally in each patient. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were calculated by κ coefficientsRoche Netherlands BV provided funding for the reliability exercise. Roche Netherlands BV did not participate in the study design, data collection, dataanalysis, or writing of the manuscript. Supported by the project (Ministry of Health, Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 (Institute of Rheumatology) and by project No. NT1243

Personal non-commercial use only

ABSTRACT. Objective. To summarize the work performed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound (US) Working Group on the validation of US as a potential outcome measure in gout. Methods. Based on the lack of definitions, highlighted in a recent literature review on US as an outcome tool in gout, a series of iterative exercises were carried out to obtain consensus-based definitions on US elementary components in gout using a Delphi exercise and subsequently testing these definitions in static images and in patients with proven gout. Cohen&apos;s κ was used to test agreement, and values of 0-0.20 were considered poor, 0.20-0.40 fair, 0.40-0.60 moderate, 0.60-0.80 good, and 0.80-1 excellent. Results. With an agreement of &gt; 80%, consensus-based definitions were obtained for the 4 elementary lesions highlighted in the literature review: tophi, aggregates, erosions, and double contour (DC). In static images interobserver reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect, and similar results were found for the intrareader reliability. In patients the intraobserver agreement was good for all lesions except DC (moderate). The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) US Working Group (Appendix 1) developed a gout subgroup with the purpose of validating US as an imaging tool for gout. If this objective is achieved, US may be implemented as an outcome measure in gout. Is Ultrasound a Validated Outcome Measure in Gout? In 2013, a systematic literature review was published evaluating US as an outcome tool in gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia 10 . The report found 18 out of 67 articles published since 1975 to be eligible for review. Described in the literature were 4 main pathologies related solely to gout: tophi, double contour sign (DC), soft tissue abnormalities, and bony lesions. The review highlighted that US was able to detect tophi using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a gold standard, and this measure was found sensitive to change. The DC is an articular cartilage abnormality related to the deposition of crystals on the surface of the hyaline cartilage, which seemed specific to gout, with excellent inter-reader reliability and sensitive to change (the latter only in a very small patient population). Soft tissue pathology such as intrasynovial hyperechogenicity may be indicative of gout. US was less sensitive than MRI for diagnosing erosions (bony lesions) but more sensitive than conventional radiography, as is also known from rheumatoid arthritis studies Criterion and construct validity were assessed only for tophi, and overall there was a lack of consensus on the definitions of the 4 elementary lesions and their validity according to the OMERACT filter 13 . Current Limitations of US in Gout Assessment Despite clear interest in this imaging technique for the management of gout, the literature review clearly pointed to a lack of clear US definitions for the main 4 elementary lesions identified: tophi, DC, soft tissue hyperechogenicity (punctuate crystal aggregates), and bony lesions (erosions). This lack of consensus-based definitions impairs the ability to validate US according to the OMERACT filter and hampers widespread use of US in therapeutic clinical trials, due to the difficulty to measure the same phenomenon. In order to implement US in the management of patients with established or suspected gout the &quot;gout subgroup of the OMERACT US Working Group&quot; initiated a validation process. The first step was to obtain consensus-based definitions for the US elementary lesion as indicated by the literature review. This was accomplished by performing a Delphi exercise 14 . Thirty-five rheumatologists performing US and with an interest in gout were invited to participate, and 32 responded positively. After 3 Delphi rounds, &gt; 80% agreement was obtained for each definition Agreement was obtained to use the existing definitions for both synovitis and tenosynovitis 15 because these may be co-components in gout disease. Agreement could not be obtained to include synovitis (including Doppler activity) as an elementary lesion indicative of gout, because the presence of synovitis alone was not considered specific enough to define gout disease because it is a key component in other inflammatory arthropathies as well 14 . On the other hand, even if erosions may also be seen in other arthropathy conditions, since they may also be found extraarticularly in gout and may possibly have a slightly different appearance, it was decided to test, as part of the Delphi exercise, whether the existing definition worked also in gout. Perfect agreement was obtained to keep the definition close to the definition used for erosions in general. The second step was to test the reliability of the obtained definitions in a Web exercise consisting of static images of the elementary lesions. The Web exercise included 110 US images of the 4 lesions obtained from feet and knees and 20 of these images were shown twice in order to test both interand intrareader reliability. Twenty-seven of the 35 rheumatologists participating in the Delphi exercise participated in the reliability study. Cohen&apos;s κ was used to evaluate interand intrareader reliability. Κ values 0-0.20 were considered poor; 0.20-0.40 fair; 0.40-0.60 moderate; 0.60-0.80 good; and 0.80-1 excellent The third step was to test the agreement and reliability of the elementary lesions in a cohort of patients with gout. Sixteen of the rheumatologists previously involved in the first and second step participated in a workshop with 8 patients with crystal-proven gout. Both intra-and inter-reader reliability was assessed by scanning the patients twice within the same day. The areas of attention were the intercondylar region of the knee, the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, and the patellar tendon. Cohen&apos;s κ was used to evaluate inter-and intrareader reliability. Κ values of 0-0.20 were considered poor; 0.20-0.40 fair; 0.40-0.60 moderate; 0.60-0.80 good; and 0.80-1 excellen