Rasch Analysis of the International Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0

Objective: To examine the internal construct validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0 (QoL-BDS V2.0) and compare this with the internal construct validity of the original version of the QoL-BDS. Design: International cross-sectional psychometric study. Setting: Spinal rehabilitation units, clinics, and community. Participants: The study involved 5 sites and 4 countries, 2 of whose primary language is not English. Each site included a consecutive sample of inpatients with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and a convenience sample of individuals with SCI/D living in the community (N=565). Main outcome measures: The QoL-BDS V2.0 consists of the 3 original items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health, psychological health of the QoL-BDS, and an additional item on satisfaction with social life. All 4 items are answered on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Rasch analysis was performed on versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the QoL-BDS to examine the ordering of the items' response options, item scaling, reliability, item fit, local item independence, differential item functioning, and unidimensionality. Results: The sample included 565 participants with 57% outpatients and 43% inpatients. Mean age was 51.4 years; 71% were male; 65% had a traumatic injury, 40% had tetraplegia, and 67% were wheelchair users. Item thresholds were collapsed for ordering, and subsequent analyses showed good internal construct validity for the QoL-BDS V2.0 with a person separation reliability of 0.76 and Cronbach α of 0.81. Infit and outfit statistics ranged 0.62-0.91. No local dependencies and multidimensionality were found. Differential item functioning was observed only for country and inpatients vs outpatients but not for other participants' characteristics. Differences in internal construct validity between the 3-item and 4-item versions were minimal. Conclusions: The results of this Rasch analysis support the internal construct validity of the QoL-BDS V2.0

Rasch Analysis of the International Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0

Objective: To examine the internal construct validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0 (QoL-BDS V2.0) and compare this with the internal construct validity of the original version of the QoL-BDS. Design: International cross-sectional psychometric study. Setting: Spinal rehabilitation units, clinics, and community. Participants: The study involved 5 sites and 4 countries, 2 of whose primary language is not English. Each site included a consecutive sample of inpatients with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and a convenience sample of individuals with SCI/D living in the community (N=565). Main Outcome Measures: The QoL-BDS V2.0 consists of the 3 original items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health, psychological health of the QoL-BDS, and an additional item on satisfaction with social life. All 4 items are answered on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Rasch analysis was performed on versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the QoL-BDS to examine the ordering of the items’ response options, item scaling, reliability, item fit, local item independence, differential item functioning, and unidimensionality. Results: The sample included 565 participants with 57% outpatients and 43% inpatients. Mean age was 51.4 years; 71% were male; 65% had a traumatic injury, 40% had tetraplegia, and 67% were wheelchair users. Item thresholds were collapsed for ordering, and subsequent analyses showed good internal construct validity for the QoL-BDS V2.0 with a person separation reliability of 0.76 and Cronbach α of 0.81. Infit and outfit statistics ranged 0.62-0.91. No local dependencies and multidimensionality were found. Differential item functioning was observed only for country and inpatients vs outpatients but not for other participants’ characteristics. Differences in internal construct validity between the 3-item and 4-item versions were minimal. Conclusions: The results of this Rasch analysis support the internal construct validity of the QoL-BDS V2.0

Preliminary psychometric analyses of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary psychometric analysis of cross-sectional previously collected data. OBJECTIVES: Explore the floor and ceiling effects, convergent, and divergent validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Quality of Life Data Set (SCI QoL-BDS) in a sample of people with spinal cord damage (SCD) from different countries, with different causes (both traumatic and non-traumatic), and different settings. SETTING: Community dwellers with SCD in Australia, Brazil, India, The Netherlands, and USA, and inpatient rehabilitation: India. METHODS: Adults (>18 years) with chronic SCD with either traumatic or non-traumatic aetiologies living in the community (n = 624), in inpatient rehabilitation following the onset of SCI (India; n = 115) and able-bodied controls (Australia; n = 220) had the following data collected by survey or face-face interview: SCI QoL-BDS, demographic and clinical characteristics (e.g., age, gender, years post SCI/SCD, education, employment) and reference measures of quality of life, disability and depression. RESULTS: For the whole sample, there were no notable floor or ceiling effects, internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and the corrected item-total correlations generally were acceptable (all > 0.3 except for in Brazilian cohort). Convergent and divergent validity were largely confirmed though there were some aspects of validity that were suboptimal. CONCLUSIONS: Only minor psychometric issues were identified. This preliminary analysis suggests that there are no reason for concern about the use of the SCI QoL-BDS for clinical or research purposes, notwithstanding the need for further studies

Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set:an international psychometric study

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric study. OBJECTIVES: To examine the reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set (QoL-BDS) in an international sample of community-dwelling adults with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/SCD) and in subgroups with respect to age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years) and etiology. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinics and community. METHODS: Participants were people living with SCI/D in four countries, at least 1 year post onset and at least 18 years of age. The QoL-BDS consists of three items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health and psychological health rated on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. A fourth item on satisfaction with social life was included based on feedback from participants. RESULTS: A total of 79 people were included. Median age was 52 years. Most participants (69.6%) had SCI, paraplegia (53%), and 40.5% reported a motor complete injury. Median time between tests was 14 days (range 4-27). Intra-class correlation (ICC) values of the items ranged from 0.66 to 0.80. ICC values of the three-item and four-item total scores were identical and good (0.83; 95% CI 0.75-0.89). Subgroup analyses showed ICC values ranging from 0.76 to 0.83. Bland-Altman plots suggested no bias for the three-item total score, but some bias for the four-item total score. The limits of agreement of both scores were similar, wide at individual level and small at group level. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of reproducibility of the current version of the QoL-BDS. When adding a fourth item, reproducibility was maintained

Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease

Objective: To provide an overview of clinical assessments and diagnostic tools, self-report measures (SRMs) and data sets used in neurogenic bladder and bowel (NBB) dysfunction and recommendations for their use with persons with spinal cord injury /disease (SCI/D).Methods: Experts in SCI/D conducted literature reviews, compiled a list of NBB related assessments and measures, reviewed their psychometric properties, discussed their use in SCI/D and issued recommendations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Common Data Elements (CDEs) guidelines.Results: Clinical assessments included 15 objective tests and diagnostic tools for neurogenic bladder and 12 for neurogenic bowel. Following a two-phase evaluation, eight SRMs were selected for final review with the Qualiveen and Short-Form (SF) Qualiveen and the Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) being recommended as supplemental, highly-recommended due to their strong psychometrics and extensive use in SCI/D. Two datasets and other SRM measures were recommended as supplemental.Conclusion: There is no one single measure that can be used to assess NBB dysfunction across all clinical research studies. Clinical and diagnostic tools are here recommended based on specific medical needs of the person with SCI/D. Following the CDE for SCI studies guidelines, we recommend both the SF-Qualiveen for bladder and the NBDS for bowel as relatively short measures with strong psychometrics. Other measures are also recommended. A combination of assessment tools (objective and subjective) to be used jointly across the spectrum of care seems critical to best capture changes related to NBB and develop better treatments