6 research outputs found
Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age : a prospective follow-up study
Background: Clubfeet are typically shorter than normal feet. This study aimed first to describe the development of foot length in a consecutive series of children with congenital clubfoot and second to relate foot length to development of relapse and motion quality. Methods: Foot length was measured every 6 months in 72 consecutive children with congenital clubfoot (29 bilateral) aged from 2 to 7 years. The initial treatment was nonsurgical followed by standardized orthotic treatment. Foot length growth rate was calculated every half year. In children with unilateral clubfeet, the difference in foot length between the clubfoot and the contralateral foot was calculated. Motion quality was evaluated by the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP). Studentâs t test, the MannâWhitney U test and Spearmanâs correlation were used for group comparisons. Bonferroni correction was used when multiple comparisons were performed. Results: Clubfeet were smaller (P < 0.001) than reference feet at all ages but had a similar growth rate up to age 7. Unilateral clubfeet with greater difference in size compared with the contralateral foot at the first measurement, relapsed more frequently (P = 0.016) and correlated with poorer motion quality (r = 0.4; P = 0.011). Conclusions: As previously reported, clubfeet were smaller than reference feet at all ages. The growth rate, however, was similar between clubfeet and reference feet. Children with unilateral clubfeet and greater foot length difference at 2 years of age had a higher tendency to relapse and poorer motion quality at 7 years of age, indicating that foot length could be used as a prognostic tool
Correlations between the Gait Profile Score and standard clinical outcome measures in children with idiopathic clubfoot
Background: Measures of overall gait deviations such as the Gait Profile Score (GPS) and the Gait Variable Score (GVS) are used to evaluate gait in clinical practice and for research purposes. In the clinical setting, gait deviations are often visually assessed and classified using structured protocols such as the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP). Research question: Determine the relationship between measures of overall gait deviations and clinical assessments. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated the usability of GPS and GVS in children with idiopathic clubfoot. Twenty consecutively born children with idiopathic clubfoot participated in this study. At 7 years of age, the children were referred for three-dimensional gait analysis and, on the same day, they also underwent a clinical examination according to the CAP. Results: The overall gait deviations, expressed as the GPS (overall and affected side) and the GVS for nine key variables were calculated. The correlations between the GPS and values from CAP, its domains, and a single item called walking and between the item walking and the GVS values were analyzed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r s ). The item walking correlated significantly with the GPS (r s = â0.62), and the GVS for foot progression (r s = â0.61) and foot dorsiflexion/plantarflexion (r s = â0.50). The domain âmorphologyâ correlated with the GPS (r s = 0.64). Significance: These findings indicate that the GPS index along with the GVS reflects gait deviations observed clinically in children with clubfoot
Evaluation of gait, relapse and compliance in clubfoot treatment with custom-made orthoses
Relapse after successful initial correction of idiopathic clubfoot with the Ponseti method is often related to poor compliance with the foot abduction orthosis (FAO). The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment with custom-made dynamic orthoses. Twenty children with idiopathic clubfoot (30 feet) who had been treated with dynamic orthoses after the correction phase according to the Ponseti casting technique were evaluated. Relapse rates during orthotic treatment were registered. A Vicon gait analysis system was used to measure gait parameters at the age of seven years. The overall gait quality was estimated with the Gait Deviation Index (GDI). Data were analyzed with a nested mixed model and compared with a control group of 16 healthy children. No relapse occurred during the orthotic treatment. High compliance with the orthoses was observed based on parentsâ self report and physiotherapist observations. Gait analysis showed decreased ankle power and moment, increased internal foot progression, decreased dorsiflexion during stance, and increased plantar flexion at initial contact compared with the control group. Hip and shank rotations were normal. No calcaneus or equinus gait was observed. The mean GDI was 89.7 (range 71.6â104). The gait analysis outcomes and frequency of relapse were comparable to those of previous studies. Internal foot progression originated primarily from the foot level and was not, as frequently found after FAO treatment, compensated by external rotation at knee or hip level. In children exhibiting poor compliance with an FAO, this dynamic model is considered an effective alternative
The foot drawing method : reliability of measuring foot length and outward rotation in children with clubfoot
Background: The Ponseti method is the gold standard for clubfoot treatment. However, relapse and residual gait deviations are common, and follow-up until 7 years of age is recommended. We evaluated the reliability of the foot drawing method, a new instrument for the follow-up of clubfoot. The method uses drawings of the foot in the neutral position and external rotation to measure foot length and outward rotation. Methods: Nineteen children aged 2.5â7 years who were treated with the Ponseti method for congenital clubfoot were included. Two raters made the drawings twice (D1 and D2). Each rater measured foot length, foot rotation, and footâtibial rotation independently (D1). Later, the raters repeated the measurements (D2). Interrater reliability was assessed using the D1 from each rater. Intrarater reliability was assessed using the measurements from each raterâs D1 and D2. BlandâAltman plots were used to visualize the limits of agreement (LoA). The mean, 95% confidence interval, and one standard deviation of the differences in all measurements were calculated. Results: The mean differences between and within raters were: foot length < 1 mm, foot rotation < 1°, and footâtibia rotation < 2°, which indicated no systematic differences. The LoA for foot length were: 4.5 mm and 5.9 mm between raters for D1, â 4.8 mm and 5.9 mm for rater 1 (D1âD2), and â 5.1 mm and 5 mm for rater 2 (D1âD2). The LoA for foot rotation: were â 12° and 10.6° between raters (D1), â 8.4° and 6.6° for rater 1 (D1âD2), and â 14° and 14.1° for rater 2 (D1âD2). The LoA for footâtibia rotation were: â 17.8° and 14.3° between raters (D1), â 12° and 12.2° for rater 1 (D1âD2), and â 12.7° and 13.6° for rater 2 (D1â D2). Conclusions: The absence of systematic differences between and within raters, and LoA observed indicate that the foot drawing method is applicable in clinical practice and research. However, the results of the foot and footâtibia rotation analyses imply that caution is needed when interpreting changes in foot rotation in feet with higher degrees of rotation