11 research outputs found

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

    Get PDF
    In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

    Vascular endothelial growth factor C is increased in endometrium and promotes endothelial functions, vascular permeability and angiogenesis and growth of endometriosis

    No full text
    Endometriosis is an angiogenesis-dependent disease. Many studies demonstrated inhibition of angiogenesis leads to inhibition of endometriotic growth, however underlying mechanism is still not fully understood. Our previous study suggested vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) as a target of anti-angiogenesis therapy for endometriosis. In this study, VEGF-C in endometrium and its role in angiogenesis of endometriosis were studied. Human endometrium were obtained from women with and without endometriosis for molecular studies. VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C and VEGF-D mRNA and proteins in eutopic and ectopic endometrium were measured. Human endothelial cells were transfected with VEGF-C siRNA in vitro, effects of VEGF-C on endothelial cell migration, invasion and tube formation were investigated in vitro. Angiogenesis was inhibited in wild type mice, vascular permeability in dermal skin was determined in vivo. Transplanted endometrium were inhibited by VEGF-C siRNA in immunocompromised mice, development, growth and angiogenesis of the experimental endometriosis were compared in vivo. The results showed that VEGF-C mRNA and protein were increased in eutopic and ectopic endometrium of endometriosis patients. VEGF-C siRNA significantly inhibited endothelial cell migration and tube formation. VEGF-C siRNA significantly inhibited development and angiogenesis of the experimental endometriotic lesions in mice. Supplementation and over-expression of VEGF-C significantly reversed the inhibitory effects on the endothelial functions, vascular permeability and endometriotic growth. In conclusion, VEGF-C is increased in endometrium and it promotes endothelial functions, vascular permeability and development of experimental endometriosis. VEGF-C is important for angiogenesis in endometriosis. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

    Indicação inicial de tratamento em 60 pacientes com distĂșrbios ventilatĂłrios obstrutivos do sono Initial indication of treatment in 60 patients with sleep obstructive ventilatory disturbance

    Get PDF
    OBJETIVO: Os autores apresentam um estudo descritivo retrospectivo de 60 pacientes portadores de distĂșrbios ventilatĂłrios obstrutivos do sono (DVOS), atendidos no Centro Campinas de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço num perĂ­odo de trĂȘs anos. Todos os pacientes foram examinados segundo protocolo padronizado e as decisĂ”es quanto Ă  primeira conduta terapĂȘutica resultaram de discussĂŁo conjunta multidisciplinar sistemĂĄtica. FORMA DE ESTUDO: clĂ­nico retrospectivo. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Os pacientes foram distribuĂ­dos em dois grupos segundo a proposta de tratamento nĂŁo-cirĂșrgico e cirĂșrgico. Em seguida, foram estudados quanto Ă  modalidade inicial de tratamentos propostos e os principais achados propedĂȘuticos: Ă­ndice de distĂșrbio respiratĂłrio (IDR), Ă­ndice de massa corpĂłrea (IMC), anĂĄlise cefalomĂ©trica e manobra de MĂŒller. Os principais achados propedĂȘuticos foram comparados, isoladamente ou em associaçÔes com a modalidade de tratamento proposto. CONCLUSÃO: As principais conclusĂ”es mostram que nas roncopatias, a indicação de tratamento nĂŁo-cirĂșrgico e cirĂșrgico se fez na mesma proporção; a indicação de tratamento cirĂșrgico prevaleceu na SĂ­ndrome da ApnĂ©ia-HipopnĂ©ia Obstrutiva do Sono (SAHOS), independente de sua modalidade; o IDR, o IMC e a manobra de MĂŒller nĂŁo tiveram influĂȘncia na indicação de qualquer modalidade terapĂȘutica; a decisĂŁo terapĂȘutica decorreu de estudo propedĂȘutico sistematizado e da atuação multidisciplinar, havendo cada caso sido discutido individualmente.<br>AIM: The author present a retrospective descriptive study of 60 patients with sleep obstructive ventilatory disturbance who have taken medical advice at the Centro Campinas de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço during a period of three years. All the patients have been examined after standardized protocol and decisions related to the treatment have been taken after systematic multidisciplinary discussion. STUDY DESIGN: clinical retrospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The patients were distributed into two groups according to the proposal of surgical and non-surgical treatment. After so, they were studied according to the model of treatment proposed and the main propaedeutic findings: respiratory disturbance index (RDI), body mass index (BMI), cephalometric analysis and MĂŒller maneuver. The main features were compared - isolated or in association - with the model of treatment proposed. CONCLUSION: Amongst several conclusions obtained, the most important were: surgical and non-surgical treatment were indicated almost in the same proportion for of snoring; surgical treatments were most indicated for snoring and Apnoea-Hipopnoea Syndrome, despite of its modality; RDI, BMI and cephalometric analysis and MĂŒller maneuver had no influence at any therapeutic modality; the therapeutic decision was taken after standardized protocol and systematic multidisciplinary discussion, where each case was discussed individually
    corecore