Native Solitary Bees Provide Economically Significant Pollination Services to Confection Sunflowers (\u3ci\u3eHelianthus annuus\u3c/i\u3e L.) (Asterales: Asteraceae) Grown Across the Northern Great Plains

The benefits of insect pollination to crop yields depend on genetic and environmental factors including plant selffertility, pollinator visitation rates, and pollinator efficacy. While many crops benefit from insect pollination, such variation in pollinator benefits across both plant cultivars and growing regions is not well documented. In this study, across three states in the northern Great Plains, United States, from 2016 to 2017, we evaluated the pollinatormediated yield increases for 10 varieties of confection sunflowers, Helianthus annuus L. (Asterales: Asteraceae), a plant that is naturally pollinator-dependent but was bred for self-fertility. We additionally measured pollinator visitation rates and compared per-visit seed set across pollinator taxa in order to determine the most efficacious sunflower pollinators. Across all locations and hybrids, insect pollination increased sunflower yields by 45%, which is a regional economic value of over $40 million and a national value of over$56 million. There was, however, some variation in the extent of pollinator benefits across locations and plant genotypes, and such variation was significantly related to pollinator visitation rates, further highlighting the value of pollinators for confection sunflowers. Female Andrena helianthi Robertson (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) and Melissodes spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were the most common and effective pollinators, while other bees including managed honey bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), small-bodied sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), and male bees were either infrequent or less effective on a per-visit basis. Our results illustrate that wild bees, in particular the sunflower specialists A. helianthi and Melissodes spp., provide significant economic benefits to confection sunflower production

Moyo Vol. X N 1

Million, Chris. Coming Around to Reality: Former Cult Member Turned Editor Uses You for His Own Therapeutic Purposes . 4. Louden, Annie. A Disciple of Mr. Dewey, and All His Dirty Little Decimals: Confession of a Book-Hoarding Monomaniac . 5. Soucy, Kate. 14 Days in Dumay: Reflections After a Trip to Haiti . 6. Frieberg, Alicia. Foreign Hostel Encounters:Ireland, Land of Ire . 8. Fisher, Dan. Open the Road Wider. Open The Road Wider. The Girft of the Reverend Jusan Fudo William Frank Parker . 10. Barrett, Laura. Requiem for An Okay Cat . Cinema Annex Formerly Home to One Heck of an Adequate Feline . 11. The Editors. Late-Night Delivery Frightens Editors into Submission . 12. 2nd Chief Angel of the Quill. A Statement from the Mystic and Calorific Band of the Wingless Angels . 13. Miller, Jeremy. Rapunzel, Rapunzel, Let Down Your Keycard! Denison man Struggles to Reach Girlfriend at Medium Security Prison... er... University . 15. Mallinger, Adam. Cult-Invated Taste: Pop Cult Vs. Pop Culture . 16.; Million, Chris. A Day in the Lights. A Ballet Boy\u27s Continued Search for masculinity . 18. Newitt, Heidi. Show Us Your Tits! A Feminist Glimpse Into the Overt Misogyny in Popular Culture Today . 20. Woods, Lindsay. Stuck in the Doledrums. Attempted Seduction of U.S. Senator Strikes Out . 22. Hankinson, Tom. Wingless Angels Just a Bunch of Dorks: Denison\u27s Secret Society-Watch Out, They Might Hit You With a Pocket Protector . 20. Silverstein, Illana. First Contact: Improvisational Dance on Campus . 32. Dunson, Jim. Philosophy of Pecan Pie: The Culmination of a Grand Tradition of Cu-lino-Epistemological Thought . Kovach, Steve. Empirical Test Goes Horribly Awry: Frozen Yogurt Proves Less Philosophically Fruitful than Pie . 34

Moyo Vol. X N 2

Million, Chris. Editor\u27s Letter . 4. Kaczur, Erin. Why It Sucks to be Human: I Would Like to Change My Casing, Not My Underwear . 5. Dunson, Jim and Tom Hankinson. MoYummy: Our Staff Connoisseurs Hit the Spots That Hit the Spot . 6. Fisher, Dan. Happy, O Monk, Is Thy Shadow! A No Pluses, No Minuses Memory of a Spiritual Friend . 10. Reuss, Liz. Who is S/He? Leslie Feinberg Interview Inspires Introspection . 11. Marston, Jennifer. MoYo Millenium Picks: Ghandi Can Forget it . 12. Bungard, Chris. Pop The Cork on Ireland. Strictly No Drinking Stritly Ignored . 13. Wilson, Kalyn. Pagans in print: The Craft--So Much more Than Sabrina . 14. Mallinger, Adam. DU Press Release Revisited . 16. Zellner, Kelli. Denison University\u27s Campus Compact--Myth or Reality? DU\u27s Bubble, Burst . 17. Hankinson, Tom. Bureaucracy--Friend of the Common man. An Explication Rather Than an Expletive . 18. The TasyPaycheck. A Very Tasty Quiz: The Denison Social Hierarchy - Do You Cut it? 20. Mong, Derek. The Armpit Epiphany . 21. Curry, Kim. Hot Child in The City: An Unaccustomed look Back from a Big Apple Intern . 22. Million, Chris. Their Last Chance! 32. Kovach, Steve. Risk-y Business: Strategies for Getting More enjoyment Out of World Conquest . 34

2016 Research & Innovation Day Program

A one day showcase of applied research, social innovation, scholarship projects and activities.https://first.fanshawec.ca/cri_cripublications/1003/thumbnail.jp

Native Solitary Bees Provide Economically Significant Pollination Services to Confection Sunflowers (\u3ci\u3eHelianthus annuus\u3c/i\u3e L.) (Asterales: Asteraceae) Grown Across the Northern Great Plains

The benefits of insect pollination to crop yields depend on genetic and environmental factors including plant selffertility, pollinator visitation rates, and pollinator efficacy. While many crops benefit from insect pollination, such variation in pollinator benefits across both plant cultivars and growing regions is not well documented. In this study, across three states in the northern Great Plains, United States, from 2016 to 2017, we evaluated the pollinatormediated yield increases for 10 varieties of confection sunflowers, Helianthus annuus L. (Asterales: Asteraceae), a plant that is naturally pollinator-dependent but was bred for self-fertility. We additionally measured pollinator visitation rates and compared per-visit seed set across pollinator taxa in order to determine the most efficacious sunflower pollinators. Across all locations and hybrids, insect pollination increased sunflower yields by 45%, which is a regional economic value of over $40 million and a national value of over$56 million. There was, however, some variation in the extent of pollinator benefits across locations and plant genotypes, and such variation was significantly related to pollinator visitation rates, further highlighting the value of pollinators for confection sunflowers. Female Andrena helianthi Robertson (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) and Melissodes spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were the most common and effective pollinators, while other bees including managed honey bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), small-bodied sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), and male bees were either infrequent or less effective on a per-visit basis. Our results illustrate that wild bees, in particular the sunflower specialists A. helianthi and Melissodes spp., provide significant economic benefits to confection sunflower production

Fab Lab (Semester Unknown) IPRO 333

Fabrication Laboratories, or Fab Labs, were started as a community outreach program by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology providing digital fabrication tools for rapid prototyping to the general public. The Museum of Science and Industry has partnered with IPRO to further develop the Fab Lab at their site. IPRO 333 has been rendered the task of working with the administration in the Fab lab of MSI to design methodologies for furthering the use of the laboratory and assisting in determining its end goals for both the museum and the community by working with the lab directors to broaden the possible uses of the lab, promoting membership at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago, and involving the community in science and technology programs at the museum. In order to accomplish our tasks we have broken into three main teams, each of which will focus on a different aspect of the lab. The first team will be responsible for creating events specific to the museum members, creating proposals for low‐cost, high‐profit activities for the lab, and possibly creating a website where users of the lab may sign up for time in the lab, reserve or order materials, and rent storage space for long term projects they wish to work on. The second team is responsible for integrating the Fab Lab into the current working exhibits as well as future exhibitions. The third team will be responsible for designing and creating new programs for users of the Fab Lab, such as the students enrolled in the Science Achievers program or museum members.Deliverable