10 research outputs found
Research Writing, Peer Review and Academic Publishing: Benefits of Individual, Institutional and Journal Mentoring
Writing academic research papers acceptable for journal publication is not often taught in graduate programs let alone in undergraduate studies. Students and early career researchers (herein known as students for both categories) usually undergo a trial-and-error period to learn how to navigate the publication submission process—a long and daunting task. However, E-mentoring, or electronic mentoring, has proven to be beneficial for students. E-mentoring opportunities can be found by a pro-active student seeking out published researchers in their fields and requesting if they can mentor them. Colleges, universities or other academic institutions may have formal or informal research or peer review programmes, internship, field experience or practicum courses for-credit. Academic journals may also host student mentoring programmes for peer review, editing, and/or research writing hands-on experiences.
Mentoring students in research writing and the journal publication process should start as early in one’s academic career as possible. Age or academic status should not be seen as a deterrent or disadvantage when mentored by a patient, experienced and enthusiastic research mentor. Such e-mentoring experiences can be offered by individual researchers, at the institutional level or from the academic journal—the latter being the most ideal model worthy of advocacy and replication
Virtual Interview Preparation for Generation Z Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Students - A Necessity for the Post-Pandemic Era
Social distancing and remote work were mandated worldwide during the COVID-19 lockdown. While virtual interviews were conducted prior to lockdown due to the growing global workforce, they became normalized during the pandemic for both work and school. Hiring agents may believe that having grown up with technology and the internet Generation Z (Gen Z) may be well-prepared for virtual interviews. However, the challenge they face is not technology-related. Gen Z individuals, particularly those in STEM fields, often lack well-developed practical and pragmatic life skills, such as effective communication. A remote independent research scholar and her student compiled this field report. First, the general characteristics of Gen Z STEM students are presented, followed by a virtual interview preparation guide with tips, recommendations and examples. Given the ever-changing global remote workforce, future empirical studies are recommended on the virtual hiring process of Gen Z STEM students which includes and expands upon virtual interviews
Research Writing, Peer Review and Academic Publishing : Benefits of Individual, Institutional and Journal Mentoring
Writing academic research papers acceptable for journal publication is not often taught in
graduate programs let alone in undergraduate studies. Students and early career researchers
(herein known as students for both categories) usually undergo a trial-and-error period to learn
how to navigate the publication submission process—a long and daunting task. However, E-
mentoring, or electronic mentoring, has proven to be beneficial for students. E-mentoring
opportunities can be found by a pro-active student seeking out published researchers in their
fields and requesting if they can mentor them. Colleges, universities or other academic
institutions may have formal or informal research or peer review programmes, internship, field
experience or practicum courses for-credit. Academic journals may also host student mentoring
programmes for peer review, editing, and/or research writing hands-on experiences.
Mentoring students in research writing and the journal publication process should start as early
in one’s academic career as possible. Age or academic status should not be seen as a deterrent
or disadvantage when mentored by a patient, experienced and enthusiastic research mentor.
Such e-mentoring experiences can be offered by individual researchers, at the institutional level
or from the academic journal—the latter being the most ideal model worthy of advocacy and
replication