Deep EST profiling of developing fenugreek endosperm to investigate galactomannan biosynthesis and its regulation

Galactomannans are hemicellulosic polysaccharides composed of a (1 → 4)-linked β-D-mannan backbone substituted with single-unit (1 → 6)-α-linked D-galactosyl residues. Developing fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seeds are known to accumulate large quantities of galactomannans in the endosperm, and were thus used here as a model system to better understand galactomannan biosynthesis and its regulation. We first verified the specific deposition of galactomannans in developing endosperms and determined that active accumulation occurred from 25 to 38 days post anthesis (DPA) under our growth conditions. We then examined the expression levels during seed development of ManS and GMGT, two genes encoding backbone and side chain synthetic enzymes. Based on transcript accumulation dynamics for ManS and GMGT, cDNA libraries were constructed using RNA isolated from endosperms at four ages corresponding to before, at the beginning of, and during active galactomannan deposition. DNA from these libraries was sequenced using the 454 sequencing technology to yield a total of 1.5 million expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Through analysis of the EST profiling data, we identified genes known to be involved in galactomannan biosynthesis, as well as new genes that may be involved in this process, and proposed a model for the flow of carbon from sucrose to galactomannans. Measurement of in vitro ManS and GMGT activities and analysis of sugar phosphate and nucleotide sugar levels in the endosperms of developing fenugreek seeds provided data consistent with this model. In vitro enzymatic assays also revealed that the ManS enzyme from fenugreek endosperm preferentially used GDP-mannose as the substrate for the backbone synthesis

Dynamics of Responses in Compatible Potato - Potato virus Y Interaction Are Modulated by Salicylic Acid

To investigate the dynamics of the potato – Potato virus Y (PVY) compatible interaction in relation to salicylic acid - controlled pathways we performed experiments using non-transgenic potato cv. Désirée, transgenic NahG-Désirée, cv. Igor and PVYNTN, the most aggressive strain of PVY. The importance of salicylic acid in viral multiplication and symptom development was confirmed by pronounced symptom development in NahG-Désirée, depleted in salicylic acid, and reversion of the effect after spraying with 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (a salicylic acid - analogue). We have employed quantitative PCR for monitoring virus multiplication, as well as plant responses through expression of selected marker genes of photosynthetic activity, carbohydrate metabolism and the defence response. Viral multiplication was the slowest in inoculated potato of cv. Désirée, the only asymptomatic genotype in the study. The intensity of defence-related gene expression was much stronger in both sensitive genotypes (NahG-Désirée and cv. Igor) at the site of inoculation than in asymptomatic plants (cv. Désirée). Photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism gene expression differed between the symptomatic and asymptomatic phenotypes. The differential gene expression pattern of the two sensitive genotypes indicates that the outcome of the interaction does not rely simply on one regulatory component, but similar phenotypical features can result from distinct responses at the molecular level

The Relationship of Within-Host Multiplication and Virulence in a Plant-Virus System

Background. Virulence does not represent any obvious advantage to parasites. Most models of virulence evolution assume that virulence is an unavoidable consequence of within-host multiplication of parasites, resulting in trade-offs between within-host multiplication and between-host transmission fitness components. Experimental support for the central assumption of this hypothesis, i.e., for a positive correlation between within-host multiplication rates and virulence, is limited for plant-parasite systems. Methodology/Principal Findings. We have addressed this issue in the system Arabidopsis thaliana-Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Virus multiplication and the effect of infection on plant growth and on viable seed production were quantified for 21 Arabidopsis wild genotypes infected by 3 CMV isolates. The effect of infection on plant growth and seed production depended of plant architecture and length of postembryonic life cycle, two genetically-determined traits, as well as on the time of infection in the plant's life cycle. A relationship between virus multiplication and virulence was not a general feature of this host-parasite system. This could be explained by tolerance mechanisms determined by the host genotype and operating differently on two components of plant fitness, biomass production and resource allocation to seeds. However, a positive relationship between virus multiplication and virulence was detected for some accessions with short life cycle and high seed weight to biomass ratio, which show lower levels of tolerance to infection. Conclusions/Significance. These results show that genotype-specific tolerance mechanisms may lead to the absence of a clear relationship between parasite multiplication and virulence. Furthermore, a positive correlation between parasite multiplication and virulence may occur only in some genotypes and/or environmental conditions for a given host-parasite system. Thus, our results challenge the general validity of the trade-off hypothesis for virulence evolution, and stress the need of considering the effect of both the host and parasite genotypes in analyses of host-parasite interactions. © 2007 Pagán et al.Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain.Peer Reviewe

A meta-analysis reveals the commonalities and differences in Arabidopsis thaliana response to different viral pathogens

Understanding the mechanisms by which plants trigger host defenses in response to viruses has been a challenging problem owing to the multiplicity of factors and complexity of interactions involved. The advent of genomic techniques, however, has opened the possibility to grasp a global picture of the interaction. Here, we used Arabidopsis thaliana to identify and compare genes that are differentially regulated upon infection with seven distinct (+)ssRNA and one ssDNA plant viruses. In the first approach, we established lists of genes differentially affected by each virus and compared their involvement in biological functions and metabolic processes. We found that phylogenetically related viruses significantly alter the expression of similar genes and that viruses naturally infecting Brassicaceae display a greater overlap in the plant response. In the second approach, virus-regulated genes were contextualized using models of transcriptional and protein-protein interaction networks of A. thaliana. Our results confirm that host cells undergo significant reprogramming of their transcriptome during infection, which is possibly a central requirement for the mounting of host defenses. We uncovered a general mode of action in which perturbations preferentially affect genes that are highly connected, central and organized in modules. © 2012 Rodrigo et al.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) grants BFU2009-06993 (S. F. E.) and BIO2006-13107 (C. L.) and by Generalitat Valenciana grant PROMETEO2010/016 (S. F. E.). G. R. is supported by a graduate fellowship from the Generalitat Valenciana (BFPI2007-160) and J.C. by a contract from MICINN grant TIN2006-12860. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Rodrigo Tarrega, G.; Carrera Montesinos, J.; Ruiz-Ferrer, V.; Del Toro, F.; Llave, C.; Voinnet, O.; Elena Fito, SF. (2012). A meta-analysis reveals the commonalities and differences in Arabidopsis thaliana response to different viral pathogens. PLoS ONE. 7(7):40526-40526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040526S405264052677Peng, X., Chan, E. Y., Li, Y., Diamond, D. L., Korth, M. J., & Katze, M. G. (2009). Virus–host interactions: from systems biology to translational research. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 12(4), 432-438. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.003Dodds, P. N., & Rathjen, J. P. (2010). Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(8), 539-548. doi:10.1038/nrg2812Maule, A., Leh, V., & Lederer, C. (2002). The dialogue between viruses and hosts in compatible interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5(4), 279-284. doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00272-8Whitham, S. A., Quan, S., Chang, H.-S., Cooper, B., Estes, B., Zhu, T., … Hou, Y.-M. (2003). Diverse RNA viruses elicit the expression of common sets of genes in susceptibleArabidopsis thalianaplants. The Plant Journal, 33(2), 271-283. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01625.xBailer, S., & Haas, J. (2009). Connecting viral with cellular interactomes. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 12(4), 453-459. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.004Whitham, S. A., Yang, C., & Goodin, M. M. (2006). Global Impact: Elucidating Plant Responses to Viral Infection. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 19(11), 1207-1215. doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-1207MacPherson, J. I., Dickerson, J. E., Pinney, J. W., & Robertson, D. L. (2010). Patterns of HIV-1 Protein Interaction Identify Perturbed Host-Cellular Subsystems. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(7), e1000863. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000863Jenner, R. G., & Young, R. A. (2005). Insights into host responses against pathogens from transcriptional profiling. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3(4), 281-294. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1126Andeweg, A. C., Haagmans, B. L., & Osterhaus, A. D. (2008). Virogenomics: the virus–host interaction revisited. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 11(5), 461-466. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.010Elena, S. F., Carrera, J., & Rodrigo, G. (2011). A systems biology approach to the evolution of plant–virus interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(4), 372-377. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.013Tan, S.-L., Ganji, G., Paeper, B., Proll, S., & Katze, M. G. (2007). Systems biology and the host response to viral infection. Nature Biotechnology, 25(12), 1383-1389. doi:10.1038/nbt1207-1383De la Fuente, A. (2010). From ‘differential expression’ to ‘differential networking’ – identification of dysfunctional regulatory networks in diseases. Trends in Genetics, 26(7), 326-333. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.001Albert, R. (2005). Scale-free networks in cell biology. Journal of Cell Science, 118(21), 4947-4957. doi:10.1242/jcs.02714Yu, H., Braun, P., Yildirim, M. A., Lemmens, I., Venkatesan, K., Sahalie, J., … Vidal, M. (2008). High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network. Science, 322(5898), 104-110. doi:10.1126/science.1158684Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004). Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2), 101-113. doi:10.1038/nrg1272Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406(6794), 378-382. doi:10.1038/35019019Mukhtar, M. S., Carvunis, A.-R., Dreze, M., Epple, P., Steinbrenner, J., … Moore, J. (2011). Independently Evolved Virulence Effectors Converge onto Hubs in a Plant Immune System Network. Science, 333(6042), 596-601. doi:10.1126/science.1203659Calderwood, M. A., Venkatesan, K., Xing, L., Chase, M. R., Vazquez, A., Holthaus, A. M., … Johannsen, E. (2007). Epstein-Barr virus and virus human protein interaction maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(18), 7606-7611. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702332104De Chassey, B., Navratil, V., Tafforeau, L., Hiet, M. S., Aublin‐Gex, A., Agaugué, S., … Lotteau, V. (2008). Hepatitis C virus infection protein network. Molecular Systems Biology, 4(1), 230. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.66Shapira, S. D., Gat-Viks, I., Shum, B. O. V., Dricot, A., de Grace, M. M., Wu, L., … Hacohen, N. (2009). A Physical and Regulatory Map of Host-Influenza Interactions Reveals Pathways in H1N1 Infection. Cell, 139(7), 1255-1267. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.018Dyer, M. D., Murali, T. M., & Sobral, B. W. (2008). The Landscape of Human Proteins Interacting with Viruses and Other Pathogens. PLoS Pathogens, 4(2), e32. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.0040032Golem, S., & Culver, J. N. (2003). Tobacco mosaic virusInduced Alterations in the Gene Expression Profile ofArabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 16(8), 681-688. doi:10.1094/mpmi.2003.16.8.681Espinoza, C., Medina, C., Somerville, S., & Arce-Johnson, P. (2007). Senescence-associated genes induced during compatible viral interactions with grapevine and Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(12), 3197-3212. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm165Yang, C., Guo, R., Jie, F., Nettleton, D., Peng, J., Carr, T., … Whitham, S. A. (2007). Spatial Analysis ofArabidopsis thalianaGene Expression in Response toTurnip mosaic virusInfection. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 20(4), 358-370. doi:10.1094/mpmi-20-4-0358Agudelo-Romero, P., Carbonell, P., de la Iglesia, F., Carrera, J., Rodrigo, G., Jaramillo, A., … Elena, S. F. (2008). Changes in the gene expression profile of Arabidopsis thaliana after infection with Tobacco etch virus. Virology Journal, 5(1), 92. doi:10.1186/1743-422x-5-92Agudelo-Romero, P., Carbonell, P., Perez-Amador, M. A., & Elena, S. F. (2008). Virus Adaptation by Manipulation of Host’s Gene Expression. PLoS ONE, 3(6), e2397. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002397Ascencio-Ibáñez, J. T., Sozzani, R., Lee, T.-J., Chu, T.-M., Wolfinger, R. D., Cella, R., & Hanley-Bowdoin, L. (2008). Global Analysis of Arabidopsis Gene Expression Uncovers a Complex Array of Changes Impacting Pathogen Response and Cell Cycle during Geminivirus Infection. Plant Physiology, 148(1), 436-454. doi:10.1104/pp.108.121038Babu, M., Griffiths, J. S., Huang, T.-S., & Wang, A. (2008). Altered gene expression changes in Arabidopsis leaf tissues and protoplasts in response to Plum pox virus infection. BMC Genomics, 9(1), 325. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-325De Vienne, D. M., Giraud, T., & Martin, O. C. (2007). A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees. Bioinformatics, 23(23), 3119-3124. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm500Wise, R. P., Moscou, M. J., Bogdanove, A. J., & Whitham, S. A. (2007). Transcript Profiling in Host–Pathogen Interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 45(1), 329-369. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.011107.143944Handford, M. G., & Carr, J. P. (2007). A defect in carbohydrate metabolism ameliorates symptom severity in virus-infected Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of General Virology, 88(1), 337-341. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82376-0Hou, B., Lim, E.-K., Higgins, G. S., & Bowles, D. J. (2004). N-Glucosylation of Cytokinins by Glycosyltransferases ofArabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(46), 47822-47832. doi:10.1074/jbc.m409569200Schwender, J., Goffman, F., Ohlrogge, J. B., & Shachar-Hill, Y. (2004). Rubisco without the Calvin cycle improves the carbon efficiency of developing green seeds. Nature, 432(7018), 779-782. doi:10.1038/nature03145Pagán, I., Alonso-Blanco, C., & García-Arenal, F. (2008). Host Responses in Life-History Traits and Tolerance to Virus Infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Pathogens, 4(8), e1000124. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000124Carrera, J., Rodrigo, G., Jaramillo, A., & Elena, S. F. (2009). Reverse-engineering the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptional network under changing environmental conditions. Genome Biology, 10(9), R96. doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-9-r96Geisler-Lee, J., O’Toole, N., Ammar, R., Provart, N. J., Millar, A. H., & Geisler, M. (2007). A Predicted Interactome for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 145(2), 317-329. doi:10.1104/pp.107.103465Ma, S., Gong, Q., & Bohnert, H. J. (2007). An Arabidopsis gene network based on the graphical Gaussian model. Genome Research, 17(11), 1614-1625. doi:10.1101/gr.6911207Yamada, T., & Bork, P. (2009). Evolution of biomolecular networks — lessons from metabolic and protein interactions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 10(11), 791-803. doi:10.1038/nrm2787Humphries, M. D., & Gurney, K. (2008). Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence. PLoS ONE, 3(4), e0002051. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002051Stumpf, M. P. H., & Ingram, P. J. (2005). Probability models for degree distributions of protein interaction networks. Europhysics Letters (EPL), 71(1), 152-158. doi:10.1209/epl/i2004-10531-8Khanin, R., & Wit, E. (2006). How Scale-Free Are Biological Networks. Journal of Computational Biology, 13(3), 810-818. doi:10.1089/cmb.2006.13.810Daudin, J.-J., Picard, F., & Robin, S. (2007). A mixture model for random graphs. Statistics and Computing, 18(2), 173-183. doi:10.1007/s11222-007-9046-7Uetz, P. (2006). Herpesviral Protein Networks and Their Interaction with the Human Proteome. Science, 311(5758), 239-242. doi:10.1126/science.1116804Choi, I.-R., Stenger, D. C., & French, R. (2000). Multiple Interactions among Proteins Encoded by the Mite-Transmitted Wheat Streak Mosaic Tritimovirus. Virology, 267(2), 185-198. doi:10.1006/viro.1999.0117Guo, D., Saarma, M., Rajamäki, M.-L., & Valkonen, J. P. T. (2001). Towards a protein interaction map of potyviruses: protein interaction matrixes of two potyviruses based on the yeast two-hybrid system. Journal of General Virology, 82(4), 935-939. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-82-4-935Lin, L., Shi, Y., Luo, Z., Lu, Y., Zheng, H., Yan, F., … Wu, Y. (2009). Protein–protein interactions in two potyviruses using the yeast two-hybrid system. Virus Research, 142(1-2), 36-40. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2009.01.006Shen, W., Wang, M., Yan, P., Gao, L., & Zhou, P. (2010). Protein interaction matrix of Papaya ringspot virus type P based on a yeast two-hybrid system. Acta Virologica, 54(1), 49-54. doi:10.4149/av_2010_01_49Redner, S. (2008). Teasing out the missing links. Nature, 453(7191), 47-48. doi:10.1038/453047aIrizarry, R. A. (2003). Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics, 4(2), 249-264. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249Smyth, G. K. (2004). Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3(1), 1-25. doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1027Allemeersch, J., Durinck, S., Vanderhaeghen, R., Alard, P., Maes, R., Seeuws, K., … Kuiper, M. T. R. (2005). Benchmarking the CATMA Microarray. A Novel Tool forArabidopsis Transcriptome Analysis. Plant Physiology, 137(2), 588-601. doi:10.1104/pp.104.051300Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), 829-836. doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038Tarraga, J., Medina, I., Carbonell, J., Huerta-Cepas, J., Minguez, P., Alloza, E., … Dopazo, J. (2008). GEPAS, a web-based tool for microarray data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Research, 36(Web Server), W308-W314. doi:10.1093/nar/gkn303Al-Shahrour, F., Minguez, P., Vaquerizas, J. M., Conde, L., & Dopazo, J. (2005). BABELOMICS: a suite of web tools for functional annotation and analysis of groups of genes in high-throughput experiments. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(Web Server), W460-W464. doi:10.1093/nar/gki456Al-Shahrour, F., Minguez, P., Tárraga, J., Medina, I., Alloza, E., Montaner, D., & Dopazo, J. (2007). FatiGO +: a functional profiling tool for genomic data. Integration of functional annotation, regulatory motifs and interaction data with microarray experiments. Nucleic Acids Research, 35(suppl_2), W91-W96. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm260Mueller, L. A., Zhang, P., & Rhee, S. Y. (2003). AraCyc: A Biochemical Pathway Database for Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 132(2), 453-460. doi:10.1104/pp.102.017236Navratil, V., de Chassey, B., Combe, C., & Lotteau, V. (2011). When the human viral infectome and diseasome networks collide: towards a systems biology platform for the aetiology of human diseases. BMC Systems Biology, 5(1), 13. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-5-13Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.

The Relationship of Within-Host Multiplication and Virulence in a Plant-Virus System

Background. Virulence does not represent any obvious advantage to parasites. Most models of virulence evolution assume that virulence is an unavoidable consequence of within-host multiplication of parasites, resulting in trade-offs between within-host multiplication and between-host transmission fitness components. Experimental support for the central assumption of this hypothesis, i.e., for a positive correlation between within-host multiplication rates and virulence, is limited for plant-parasite systems. Methodology/Principal Findings. We have addressed this issue in the system Arabidopsis thaliana-Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Virus multiplication and the effect of infection on plant growth and on viable seed production were quantified for 21 Arabidopsis wild genotypes infected by 3 CMV isolates. The effect of infection on plant growth and seed production depended of plant architecture and length of postembryonic life cycle, two genetically-determined traits, as well as on the time of infection in the plant's life cycle. A relationship between virus multiplication and virulence was not a general feature of this host-parasite system. This could be explained by tolerance mechanisms determined by the host genotype and operating differently on two components of plant fitness, biomass production and resource allocation to seeds. However, a positive relationship between virus multiplication and virulence was detected for some accessions with short life cycle and high seed weight to biomass ratio, which show lower levels of tolerance to infection. Conclusions/Significance. These results show that genotype-specific tolerance mechanisms may lead to the absence of a clear relationship between parasite multiplication and virulence. Furthermore, a positive correlation between parasite multiplication and virulence may occur only in some genotypes and/or environmental conditions for a given host-parasite system. Thus, our results challenge the general validity of the trade-off hypothesis for virulence evolution, and stress the need of considering the effect of both the host and parasite genotypes in analyses of host-parasite interactions. © 2007 Pagán et al.Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain.Peer Reviewe

The unfolded protein response and its relevance to connective tissue diseases

The unfolded protein response (UPR) has evolved to counter the stresses that occur in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as a result of misfolded proteins. This sophisticated quality control system attempts to restore homeostasis through the action of a number of different pathways that are coordinated in the first instance by the ER stress-senor proteins IRE1, ATF6 and PERK. However, prolonged ER-stress-related UPR can have detrimental effects on cell function and, in the longer term, may induce apoptosis. Connective tissue cells such as fibroblasts, osteoblasts and chondrocytes synthesise and secrete large quantities of proteins and mutations in many of these gene products give rise to heritable disorders of connective tissues. Until recently, these mutant gene products were thought to exert their effect through the assembly of a defective extracellular matrix that ultimately disrupted tissue structure and function. However, it is now becoming clear that ER stress and UPR, because of the expression of a mutant gene product, is not only a feature of, but may be a key mediator in the initiation and progression of a whole range of different connective tissue diseases. This review focuses on ER stress and the UPR that characterises an increasing number of connective tissue diseases and highlights novel therapeutic opportunities that may arise

Golgi-localized UDP-glucose transporter is required for cell wall integrity in rice

Cell wall-related nucleotide sugar transporters (NSTs) theoretically supply the cytosolic nucleotide sugars for glycosyltransferases (GTs) to carry out ploysaccharide synthesis and modification in the Golgi apparatus. However, the regulation of cell wall synthesis by NSTs remains undescribed. Recently, we have reported the functional characterization of Oryza sativa nucleotide sugar transport (Osnst1) mutant and its corresponding gene. OsNST1/BC14 is localized in the Golgi apparatus and transports UDP-glucose. This mutant provides us with a unique opportunity for evaluation of its broad impacts on cell wall structure and components. We previously examined cell wall composition of bc14 and wild type plants. Here, the spatial distribution of these cell wall alterations was analyzed by immunolabeling approach. Analysis of the sugar yield in different cell wall fractions indicated that this mutation improves the extractability of cell wall components. Field emission scanning electron microscopy further showed that the orientation of microfibrils in bc14 is irregular when compared to that in wild type. Therefore, this UDP-glucose transporter, making substrates available for polysaccharide biosynthesis, plays a critical role in maintaining cell wall integrity