Osteoarticular manifestations of Q fever: a case series and literature review

International audienc

Une progression tumorale fulgurante sous abatacept

INTRODUCTION: La molécule de co-stimulation Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibe l’activation lymphocytaire T. En thérapeutique, elle est ciblée de deux manières opposées : son blocage permet de restaurer l’immunité anti-tumorale en oncologie, tandis que des agonistes de CTLA4 tels que l’abatacept sont utilisés dans le traitement de certaines maladies immuno-inflammatoires et notamment la polyarthrite rhumatoïde (PR). OBSERVATION: Nous rapportons le cas d’un patient de 69 ans suivi pour une PR sévère traitée efficacement par abatacept, ayant présenté une progression tumorale anormalement rapide d’un carcinome indifférencié multi-métastatique. DISCUSSION: Bien qu’aucun sur-risque de cancer n’ait été rapporté sous abatacept, plusieurs cas de possible association avec une évolution tumorale défavorable ont été décrits. Dans le cas rapporté ici, l’abatacept pourrait avoir inhibé l’immuno-surveillance, et permis l’échappement tumoral.INTRODUCTION: Co-stimulatory molecule cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibits T-cell activation. Clinically, CTLA-4 has been targeted in opposite ways: its blockade enhances antitumor immunity in the field of oncology, whereas CTLA-4 agonists such as abatacept are used for the treatment of immuno-inflammatory diseases as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBSERVATION: We herein report the case of a 69-year-old man with a history of severe RA successfully treated with abatacept, who showed unusually rapid progression of undifferentiated multi-metastatic carcinoma. DISCUSSION: Although no significant increase in malignancy has been reported in abatacept-treated patients, several case reports have documented the possible association with the acceleration of the progression of malignancy. Here, abatacept may have altered immune surveillance and hence allowed tumor growth

J Antimicrob Chemother

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir has been suggested as an approach to improve the outcome of patients with moderate/severe COVID-19 infection. OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety of combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia treated with hydroxychloroquine and darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir. Clinical evaluations, electrocardiograms and the pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine, darunavir and lopinavir were examined according to clinical practice and guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received hydroxychloroquine with lopinavir/ritonavir (median age 68 years; 10 males) and 25 received hydroxychloroquine with darunavir/ritonavir (median age 71 years; 15 males). During treatment, eight patients (17.4%) developed ECG abnormalities. Ten patients discontinued treatment, including seven for ECG abnormalities a median of 5 (range 2-6) days after starting treatment. All ECG abnormalities reversed 1-2 days after interrupting treatment. Four patients died within 14 days. ECG abnormalities were significantly associated with age over 70 years, coexisting conditions (such as hypertension, chronic cardiovascular disease and kidney failure) and initial potential drug interactions, but not with the hydroxychloroquine concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients with COVID-19 who received hydroxychloroquine with lopinavir or darunavir, 17% had ECG abnormalities, mainly related to age or in those with a history of cardiovascular disease

BMC Fam Pract

Background Guidelines that detail preventive measures against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and influenza are published annually in France to decrease the risk of severe infections in immunocompromised patients. We aimed at describing adherence to these guidelines by GPs in the management of their asplenic patients in France between 2013 and 2016. Method We conducted a multicenter retrospective study between January 2013 and December 2016 in three French hospitals: asplenic adults were identified and their GPs were questioned. A descriptive analysis was performed to identify the immunization coverage, type and length of antibiotic prophylaxis, number of infectious episodes, and education of patients. Results 103 patients were finally included in this study: only 57% were adequately vaccinated against Streptococcus pneumoniae or Neisseria meningitidis, 74% against Haemophilus influenzae type b, and 59% against influenza. Only 24% of patients received a combination of all four vaccinations. Two-thirds of patients received prophylactic antibiotics for at least 2 years. Overall, this study found that 50% of splenectomized patients experienced at least one pulmonary or otorhinolaryngological infection, or contracted influenza. Conclusions These data match those reported in other countries, including Australia and the United Kingdom, meaning a still insufficient coverage of preventive measures in asplenic patients. Improved medical data sharing strategies between healthcare professionals, along with educational measures to keep patients and physicians up to date in the prevention of infections after splenectomy would improve health outcomes of asplenic patients