15 research outputs found

    Risks of adverse events in patients with orthostatic intolerance undergoing surgery with general anesthesia

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION: Orthostatic intolerance (OI) is a group of disorders characterized by symptoms that occur upon standing and resolve with recumbence. Although well established but not widely recognized, these diagnoses may create uncertainty for clinicians dealing with a patient affected by OI and requiring a surgical procedure.OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of intra- and postoperative major adverse events in patients with OI undergoing surgery with general anesthesia.METHODS: The study was a retrospective study of patients with orthostatic intolerance who underwent surgery requiring general anesthesia from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2018.RESULTS: A total 171 patients with OI underwent 190 surgeries. In patients with POTS and orthostatic-induced VVS, there were no major significant adverse events. There was one episode of AVNRT in a patient with POTS and one episode of bradycardia secondary to vasovagal reflex in a patient with orthostatic-induced VVS. Moreover, there were 13 (6.8%) episodes of postoperative hypotension. However, the majority of these episodes were related to bleeding, volume depletion or sepsis. All cases of hypotension responded well to appropriate therapy. In patients with OH, the rate of postoperative major adverse cardiac events was 4.7%, and the 30-day mortality rate was 6.1%. This is not significantly different from the calculated risk for patients without OH. There were no myocardial infarctions or deaths at 30 days in patients with POTS or orthostatic-induced VVS.CONCLUSION: Patients with OI may not experience higher rates of perioperative complications compared with patients without OI syndromes

    Association Between Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure and the Efficacy of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure-Lowering Therapy

    Get PDF
    Importance: Low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) has been found to be associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events; however, it is unknown whether intensifying blood pressure therapy in patients with an already low DBP to achieve a lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) target is safe or effective. Objective: To evaluate whether there is an association of baseline DBP and intensification of blood pressure-lowering therapy with the outcomes of all-cause death and cardiovascular events. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study analyzed patients who were randomized to intensive or standard BP control in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Data were collected from September 1999 to June 2009 (ACCORD-BP) and from October 2010 to August 2015 (SPRINT). Data were analyzed from December 2020 to June 2021. Exposures: Baseline DBP as a continuous variable. Main outcomes and measures: All-cause death and a composite cardiovascular end point (CVE) that included cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Results: A total of 14 094 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.2 [8.9] years; 8504 [60.4%] men) were included in this analysis. There were significant nonlinear associations between baseline DBP and all-cause death (eg, baseline DBP 50 vs 80 mm Hg: hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.08; P = .02) and the composite CVE (eg, baseline DBP 50 vs 80 mm Hg: HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-3.04; P = .003) observed among all participants. Findings for the interaction between baseline DBP and treatment group assignment for all cause death did not reach statistical significance. For intensive vs standard therapy, the HR of death for a baseline DBP of 50 mm Hg was 1.80 (95% CI, 0.95-3.39; P = .07) and that for a baseline DBP of 80 mm Hg was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.01; P = .05). Overall, there was no interaction found between baseline DBP and treatment group assignment for the composite CVE. Over the range of baseline DBP values, significant reductions in the composite CVE for patients assigned to intensive vs standard therapy were found for baseline DBP values of 80 mm Hg (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; P = .03) and 90 mm Hg (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98; P = .04). Conclusions and relevance: This pooled cohort study found no evidence of a significant interaction between baseline DBP and treatment intensity for all-cause death or for a composite CVE. These results are hypothesis generating and merit further study
    corecore