Biocompatibility of bone graft substitutes: effects on survival and proliferation of porcine multilineage stem cells in vitro

Bone graft substitutes (BGS) are widely used in clinical practice. For stem cellbased approaches to bone tissue engineering BGS need to show sufficient biocompatibility in the in vitro setting. This study was designed to demonstrate the influence of six different BGS on the proliferation and metabolic activity of porcine mesenchymal multilineage stem cells (pMSC) in vitro. Bone-marrow derived pMSC were cultivated for 24 hours with the eluates of six different BGS. The eluates were generated by incubating the BGS three times in succession for 24 hours with a culture medium and collecting the supernatants. pMSC vitality and proliferation in the presence of eluates from the first, second, and third incubation were assessed by WST-test quantification of metabolically active cells. Culture of pMSC with eluates in all cases resulted in decreased cell numbers in an eluate concentration-dependent manner. At least a 65% loss of cells compared to controls (culture medium without eluates) could be observed in the presence of undiluted eluates. The negative influence of eluates varied significantly among BGS. In all cases, second and third eluates were less potent in their negative effects on cellular vitality/proliferation. In conclusion, the BGS examined here should be submitted to thorough preincubation before in vitro use for cell-based constructs to maximize cell viability for the tissue engineering of bone. (Folia Morphol 2011; 70, 3: 154–160

Langzeitverhalten kunststoffmodifizierter Betone unter simulierter Verkehrsbeanspruchung

SIGLETechnische Informationsbibliothek Hannover: RN 8195 (12). / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekDEGerman

Collection of wound exudate from human digit tip amputations does not impair regenerative healing. A randomized trial

The regrowth of amputated digit tips represents a unique regenerative healing in mammals with subcutaneous volume regrowth, restoration of dactylogram, and suppression of scar formation. Although factor analysis in amphibians and even in mice is easy to obtain, safety of harvesting biomaterial from human digit tip amputations for analysis has not yet been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate if recovering wound exudate does hamper clinical outcome or influence microbiologic or inflammation status. A predefined cohort of 18 patients with fresh digit tip amputations was randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (debridement, occlusive dressing) with (n=9) or without (n=9) collection of the whole wound exudate in every dressing change. Primary endpoint (lengthening) and secondary endpoints (regeneration of dactylogram, nail bed and bone healing, time to complete wound closure, scar formation, 2-point discrimination, microbiologic analysis, inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-1, tumor necrosis factor-, IL-4, and IL-6) were determined by an independent, blinded observer. Patients' characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. All patients completed the study to the end of 3 months follow-up. Exudate collection did not influence primary and secondary endpoints. Furthermore, positive microbiologic findings as well as pus- and necrosis-like appearance neither impaired tissue restoration nor influenced inflammatory factor release. Here, the authors developed an easy and safe protocol for harvesting wound exudate from human digit tip amputations. For the first time, it was shown that harvesting does not impair regenerative healing. Using this method, further studies can be conducted to analyze regeneration associated factors in the human digit tip