31 research outputs found

    Adult <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ exhibit absence of sociability and deficits in male-female social interactions.

    No full text
    <p>Social approach was tested in two separate cohorts using our automated three-chambered apparatus. Cohort 1: (<b>A</b>) <i>En2</i>+/+ and +/βˆ’ displayed sociability, defined as spending more time in the chamber with the novel mouse than in the chamber with the novel object. <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ did not spend more time in the novel mouse chamber as compared to the novel object chamber, meeting the definition of lack of sociability for this task. (<b>B</b>) <i>En2</i>+/+ and +/βˆ’ spent more time sniffing the novel mouse than the novel object. <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ did not spend more time sniffing the novel mouse than the novel object, meeting the definition of lack of sociability on this more sensitive parameter of social interaction, and confirming results from the chamber time parameter investigation. (<b>C</b>) No genotype differences were found for time spent in each chamber during the habituation phase. Cohort 2: (<b>D</b>) Similar lack of sociability was seen in <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ mice for time spent in the novel mouse chamber vs. the novel object chamber. (<b>E</b>) <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ mice again failed to spend more time sniffing the novel mouse vs. the novel object. (<b>F</b>) Time spent in each chamber during the habituation phase was not different between genotypes. Cohort 1: Nβ€Š=β€Š16+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š16+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š15βˆ’/βˆ’; Cohort 2: Nβ€Š=β€Š10+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š13+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š14βˆ’/βˆ’. *p<05 vs. novel object. Reciprocal social interactions and ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) were measured in male <i>En2</i> mice during interaction with an unfamiliar estrus female mouse. (<b>G</b>) <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ males spent less time engaged in sniffing the body and anogenital regions of the female as compared to +/+ males. (<b>H</b>) The total number of USVs emitted during the test session did not differ between genotypes. (<b>I</b>) No genotype differences were found for bouts of test cage exploration during the 5-minute test session. Nβ€Š=β€Š10+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š13+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š13βˆ’/βˆ’. *p<05 vs. +/+.</p

    Statistical results for olfactory habituation/dishabituation.

    No full text
    <p>Summary of statistical results of the olfactory habituation/dishabituation test. Data are presented in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0040914#pone-0040914-g010" target="_blank">Figure 10</a>.</p

    Juvenile <i>En2</i> mutant mice display fewer reciprocal social interactions, as replicated in two cohorts.

    No full text
    <p>Cohort 1: As compared to wildtype littermates (+/+), <i>En2</i> null mutant mice (βˆ’/βˆ’) exhibited fewer bouts of (<b>A</b>) nose-to-nose sniffing. <i>En2</i>+/βˆ’ and βˆ’/βˆ’ mice displayed fewer bouts of (<b>B</b>) anogenital sniffing, and (<b>C</b>) following as compared to +/+ controls. No significant genotype differences were detected in (<b>D</b>) front approach, (<b>E</b>) self-grooming, and (<b>F</b>) exploration. Cohort 2: As compared to +/+, +/βˆ’ and βˆ’/βˆ’ exhibited fewer bouts of (<b>G</b>) nose-to-nose sniffing and (<b>H</b>) anogenital sniffing. <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ mice exhibited fewer bouts of (<b>J</b>) front approach as compared to +/+. No significant genotype differences were detected for (<b>I</b>) following behaviors, (<b>K</b>) self-grooming, or (<b>L</b>) arena exploration. Cohort 1: Nβ€Š=β€Š15+/+; Nβ€Š=β€Š15+/βˆ’; Nβ€Š=β€Š16βˆ’/βˆ’; Cohort 2: Nβ€Š=β€Š14+/+; Nβ€Š=β€Š15+/βˆ’; Nβ€Š=β€Š10βˆ’/βˆ’. *p<05 vs. +/+.</p

    Cognitive deficits in <i>En2</i> null mutants.

    No full text
    <p>Cumulative time spent freezing during the fear conditioning test sessions, as quantified by the VideoFreeze software, was converted to percent time freezing for data analysis and presentation. (<b>A</b>) Despite normal postshock freezing during training, <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ exhibited significantly less freezing than <i>En2</i>+/+ and +/βˆ’ mice upon testing of contextual and cued fear memory. Nβ€Š=β€Š23+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š23+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š20βˆ’/βˆ’. *p<.005 vs. +/+ and +/βˆ’. (<b>B</b>) In the novel object recognition test, a lack of innate object preference was observed for <i>En2</i>+/+, +/βˆ’ and βˆ’/βˆ’ mice during the familiarization phase of the task. (<b>C</b>) <i>En2</i>+/+ displayed novel object recognition memory, defined as spending more time sniffing the novel object as compared to the familiar object. <i>En2</i>+/βˆ’ exhibited a trend towards significant preference for the novel object, whereas βˆ’/βˆ’ failed to display a preference for the novel object. Nβ€Š=β€Š16+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š17+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š16βˆ’/βˆ’. *p<0.05 vs. familiar object. (<b>D</b>) In the Morris water maze, <i>En2</i>βˆ’/βˆ’ showed longer latencies to reach the hidden platform during training trials as compared to +/+. *p<u><</u>.01 vs. +/+. (<b>E</b>) In the probe trial, +/+ and +/βˆ’ mice showed selective quadrant search with a greater percentage of time spent in the training quadrant as compared to the non-trained quadrants, while βˆ’/βˆ’ failed to show selective search. (<b>F</b>) <i>En2</i>+/+ displayed a greater proportion of platform crossings in the trained quadrant as compared to the analogous locations in the non-trained quadrants, whereas +/βˆ’ and βˆ’/βˆ’ did not. Nβ€Š=β€Š16+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š13+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š13βˆ’/βˆ’. *p<05 vs. non-trained quadrant.</p

    RTQPCR analysis demonstrates that <i>En2</i> is expressed in multiple adult brain structures.

    No full text
    <p>Average β–΅Ct values with standard error are shown for the following brain structures and tissue: somatosensory cortex (ssctx), hippocampus (hippo), striatum, hypothalamus (hypoth), thalamus (thal), colliculi (coll), cerebellum (cereb), brainstem (bstem), amygdala (amyg), visual cortex (vctx), prefrontal cortex (pctx), olfactory bulb (ob), and hindlimb muscle (ms). Lower β–΅Ct values indicate high gene expression, whereas higher values reflect lower levels. nd β€Š=β€Š none detected.</p

    Statistical results for selected parameters of open field locomotor activity.

    No full text
    <p>Summary of statistical results of selected parameters of open field locomotor activity. Data are presented in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0040914#pone-0040914-g009" target="_blank">Figure 9</a>.</p

    No genotype differences in olfactory habituation/dishabituation to social and non-social odors or repetitive self-grooming.

    No full text
    <p>In cohort 1 (<b>A</b>) and cohort 2 (<b>B</b>), a significant decline in sniffing (habituation) to repeated presentations of water, two non-social odors and two social odors was observed all three genotypes. A significant increase in sniffing upon the first presentation of a novel odor (dishabituation) was also observed across genotypes. Cohort 1: Nβ€Š=β€Š15+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š15+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š15βˆ’/βˆ’; Cohort 2: Nβ€Š=β€Š12+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š10+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š10βˆ’/βˆ’. <i>En2</i>+/+, +/βˆ’ and βˆ’/βˆ’ mice in Cohort 1 (<b>C</b>) and Cohort 2 (<b>D</b>) spent a similar amount of cumulative time engaged in self-grooming during a 10 min test session. Cohort 1: Nβ€Š=β€Š15+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š16+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š15βˆ’/βˆ’; Cohort 2: Nβ€Š=β€Š11+/+, Nβ€Š=β€Š13+/βˆ’, Nβ€Š=β€Š15βˆ’/βˆ’.</p
    corecore