Systemic sclerosis disease modification clinical trials design: quo vadis?

The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss relevant aspects of clinical trials for Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and to identify important considerations for the design of SSc disease modification clinical trials. Placebo randomized controlled trials with appropriate identification of SSc patients with diffuse progressive SSc skin involvement of recent onset, along with a rescue strategy for patients with worsening lung and skin involvement are suggested. If change in skin thickening is a major outcome of the study, the selection of patients with recent onset of disease and a predetermined degree of skin involvement are crucial requirements. The trial duration should be of at least 12 months. Sample size calculations should consider differences that exceed the Minimal Important Difference. Other relevant trial designs and potential threats to study validity are also discussed. Previous SSc-disease modifying trials have been beset by high dropout rates. Analyses on the subset of subjects completing the trial or applying the last observation- carried-forward approach can potentially lead to biased estimates and false conclusions. Strategies for retention of subjects should be included at the design stage and analyses to account for missing data should be performed

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis Participating in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Trials in the United States

Recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation may be at risk for developing acute kidney injury (AKI), and this risk may be increased in patients who undergo transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) due to underlying scleroderma renal disease. AKI after transplantation can increase treatment-related mortality. To better define these risks, we analyzed 91 patients with SSc who were enrolled in 3 clinical trials in the United States of autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Eleven (12%) of the 91 patients with SSc in these studies (8 undergoing autologous HCT, 1 undergoing allogeneic HCT, 1 pretransplantation, 1 given i.v. cyclophosphamide on a transplantation trial) experienced AKI, of whom 8 required dialysis and/or therapeutic plasma exchange. AKI injury in the 9 HCT recipients developed a median of 35 days (range, 0-90 days) after transplantation. Ten of 11 patients with AKI received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) therapy. The etiology of AKI was attributed to scleroderma renal crisis in 6 patients (including 2 with normotensive renal crisis), to AKI of uncertain etiology in 2 patients, and to AKI superimposed on scleroderma kidney disease in 3 patients. Eight of the 11 patients died, one each because of progression of SSc, multiorgan failure, gastrointestinal and pulmonary bleeding, pericardial tamponade and pulmonary complications, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary embolism, graft-versus-host disease, and malignancy. Limiting nephrotoxins, cautious use of corticosteroids, renal shielding during total body irradiation, strict control of blood pressure, and aggressive use of ACE-Is may be of importance in preventing renal complications after HCT for SSc

Safety and Efficacy of B-Cell Depletion with Rituximab for the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial.

Rationale: Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is one of the most prevalent and deadly forms of PAH. B cells may contribute to SSc pathogenesis. Objectives: We investigated the safety and efficacy of B-cell depletion for SSc-PAH. Methods: In an NIH-sponsored, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial, 57 patients with SSc-PAH on stable-dose standard medical therapy received two infusions of 1,000 mg rituximab or placebo administered 2 weeks apart. The primary outcome measure was the change in 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included safety and invasive hemodynamics. We applied a machine learning approach to predict drug responsiveness. Measurements and Main Results: We randomized 57 subjects from 2010 to 2018. In the primary analysis, using data through Week 24, the adjusted mean change in 6MWD at 24 weeks favored the treatment arm but did not reach statistical significance (23.6 ± 11.1 m vs. 0.5 ± 9.7 m; P = 0.12). Although a negative study, when data through Week 48 were also considered, the estimated change in 6MWD at Week 24 was 25.5 ± 8.8 m for rituximab and 0.4 ± 7.4 m for placebo (P = 0.03). Rituximab treatment appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Low levels of RF (rheumatoid factor), IL-12, and IL-17 were sensitive and specific as favorable predictors of a rituximab response as measured by an improved 6MWD (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.88-0.95). Conclusions: B-cell depletion therapy is a potentially effective and safe adjuvant treatment for SSc-PAH. Future studies in these patients can confirm whether the identified biomarkers predict rituximab responsiveness. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrails.gov (NCT01086540)

Targeting effector memory T cells with alefacept in new onset type 1 diabetes: 12 month results from the T1DAL study

Background Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from autoimmune targeting of the pancreatic beta cells, likely mediated by effector memory T cells (Tems). CD2, a T cell surface protein highly expressed on Tems, is targeted by the fusion protein alefacept, depleting Tems and central memory T cells (Tcms). We hypothesized that alefacept would arrest autoimmunity and preserve residual beta cells in newly diagnosed T1D. Methods The T1DAL study is a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomised T1D patients 12-35 years old within 100 days of diagnosis, 33 to alefacept (two 12-week courses of 15 mg IM per week, separated by a 12-week pause) and 16 to placebo, at 14 US sites. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean 2-hour C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) at 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00965458. Findings The mean 2-hour C-peptide AUC at 12 months increased by 0.015 nmol/L (95% CI -0.080 to 0.110 nmol/L) in the alefacept group and decreased by 0.115 nmol/L (95% CI -0.278 to 0.047) in the placebo group, which was not significant (p=0.065). However, key secondary endpoints were met: the mean 4-hour C-peptide AUC was significantly higher (p=0.019), and daily insulin use and the rate of hypoglycemic events were significantly lower (p=0.02 and p<0.001, respectively) at 12 months in the alefacept vs. placebo groups. Safety and tolerability were comparable between groups. There was targeted depletion of Tems and Tcms, with sparing of naïve and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Interpretation At 12 months, alefacept preserved the 4-hour C-peptide AUC, lowered insulin use, and reduced hypoglycemic events, suggesting a signal of efficacy. Depletion of memory T cells with sparing of Tregs may be a useful strategy to preserve beta cell function in new-onset T1D

Alefacept provides sustained clinical and immunological effects in new-onset type 1 diabetes patients

BACKGROUND. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from destruction of pancreatic β cells by autoreactive effector T cells. We hypothesized that the immunomodulatory drug alefacept would result in targeted quantitative and qualitative changes in effector T cells and prolonged preservation of endogenous insulin secretion by the remaining β cells in patients with newly diagnosed T1D

Correlation Among Hypoglycemia, Glycemic Variability, and C-Peptide Preservation After Alefacept Therapy in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Analysis of Data from the Immune Tolerance Network T1DAL Trial

PURPOSE: In natural history studies, maintenance of higher levels of C-peptide secretion (a measure of endogenous insulin production) correlates with a lower incidence of major hypoglycemic events in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), but it is unclear whether this is also true for drug-induced C-peptide preservation. METHODS: We analyzed hypoglycemic events and glycemic control data from the T1DAL (Inducing Remission in New-Onset T1D with Alefacept) study, a trial of alefacept in new-onset T1D, which found significant C-peptide preservation at 1 and 2 years. We performed a post hoc analysis using mixed models of the association between the meal-stimulated 4-hour C-peptide AUC (4-hour AUC) and rates of major hypoglycemia, measures of glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c]; mean glucometer readings), and variability (glucometer SDs; highest and lowest readings), and an index of partial remission (insulin dose-adjusted HbA1c[ IDAA1c]). FINDINGS: Data from 49 participants (33 in the alefacept group and 16 in the placebo group) were analyzed at baseline and 12 and 24 months. We found that the 4-hour AUC at baseline and at 1 year was a significant predictor of the number of hypoglycemic events during the ensuing 12-month interval (p = 0.030). There was a strong association between the 4-hour AUC and glucometer SDs (P < 0.001), highest readings (p < 0.001), and lowest readings (p = 0.03), all measures of glycemic variability. There was a strong inverse correlation between the 4-hour AUC and 2 measures of glycemic control: HbA1c and mean glucometer readings (both p < 0.001). There was also a strong inverse correlation between the 4-hour AUC and IDAA1c values (p < 0.001), as well as a strong correlation between IDAA1c values and glucometer SDs (p < 0.001), suggesting that reduced glycemic variability is associated with a trend toward partial remission. None of these analyses found a significant difference between the alefacept and placebo groups. IMPLICATIONS: Measures of glycemic variability and control, including rates of hypoglycemia, are significantly correlated with preservation of C-peptide regardless of whether this is achieved by immune intervention with alefacept or natural variability in patients with new-onset T1D. Thus, preservation of endogenous insulin production by an immunomodulatory drug may confer clinical benefits similar to those seen in patients with higher C-peptide secretion due to slow disease progression

Practice based education to improve delivery systems for prevention in primary care: randomised trial

Objective To examine the effectiveness of an intervention that combined continuing medical education with process improvement methods to implement “office systems” to improve the delivery of preventive care to children. Design Randomised trial in primary care practices. Setting Private paediatric and family practices in two areas of North Carolina. Participants Random sample of 44 practices allocated to intervention and control groups. Intervention Practice based continuing medical education in which project staff coached practice staff in reviewing performance and identifying, testing, and implementing new care processes (such as chart screening) to improve delivery of preventive care. Main outcome measure Change over time in the proportion of children aged 24-30 months who received age appropriate care for four preventive services (immunisations, and screening for tuberculosis, anaemia, and lead). Results The proportion of children per practice with age appropriate delivery of all four preventive services changed, after a one year period of implementation, from 7% to 34% in intervention practices and from 9% to 10% in control practices. After adjustment for baseline differences in the groups, the change in the prevalence of all four services between the beginning and the end of the study was 4.6-fold greater (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 13.2) in intervention practices. Thirty months after baseline, the proportion of children who were up to date with preventive services was higher in intervention than in control practices; results for screening for tuberculosis (54% v 32%), lead (68% v 30%), and anaemia (79% v 71%) were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Continuing education combined with process improvement methods is effective in increasing rates of delivery of preventive care to children