33 research outputs found

    Hepatitis C among blood donors: cascade of care and predictors of loss to follow-up

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE To investigate the HCV cascade of care and to identify the factors associated with loss or absence to follow-up of patients identified as infected with hepatitis C through blood donation. METHODS Blood donors from 1994 to 2012, identified with positive anti- HCV by enzyme immunoassay and immunoblot tests were invited to participate in the study, through letters or phone calls. Patients who agreed to participate were interviewed and their blood samples were collected for further testing. The following variables were investigated: demographic data, data on comorbidities and history concerning monitoring of hepatitis C. Multiple regression analysis by Poisson regression model was used to investigate the factors associated with non-referral for consultation or loss of follow-up. RESULTS Of the 2,952 HCV-infected blood donors, 22.8% agreed to participate: 394 (58.2%) male, median age 48 years old and 364 (53.8%) Caucasian. Of the 676 participants, 39.7% did not receive proper follow-up or treatment after diagnosis: 45 patients referred not to be aware they were infected, 61 did not seek medical attention and 163 started a follow-up program, but were non-adherent. The main reasons for inadequate follow-up were not understanding the need for medical care (71%) and health care access difficulties (14%). The variables showing a significant association with inadequate follow-up after multiple regression analysis were male gender (PR = 1.40; 95%CI 1.15–1.71), age under or equal to 50 years (PR = 1.36; 95%CI 1.12–1.65) and non-Caucasians (PR = 1.53; 95%CI 1.27–1.84). CONCLUSIONS About 40.0% of patients did not receive appropriate follow-up. These data reinforce the need to establish strong links between primary care and reference centers and the need to improve access to specialists and treatments

    Clinical features and natural history of the first 2073 suspected COVID-19 cases in the Corona São Caetano primary care programme: a prospective cohort study.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Despite most cases not requiring hospital care, there are limited community-based clinical data on COVID-19. METHODS: The Corona São Caetano programme is a primary care initiative providing care to all residents with COVID-19 in São Caetano do Sul, Brazil. It was designed to capture standardised clinical data on community COVID-19 cases. After triage of potentially severe cases, consecutive patients presenting to a multimedia screening platform between 13 April and 13 May 2020 were tested at home with SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR; positive patients were followed up for 14 days with phone calls every 2 days. RT-PCR-negative patients were offered additional SARS-CoV-2 serology testing to establish their infection status. We describe the clinical, virological and natural history features of this prospective population-based cohort. FINDINGS: Of 2073 suspected COVID-19 cases, 1583 (76.4%) were tested by RT-PCR, of whom 444 (28.0%, 95% CI 25.9 to 30.3) were positive; 604/1136 (53%) RT-PCR-negative patients underwent serology, of whom 52 (8.6%) tested SARS-CoV-2 seropositive. The most common symptoms of confirmed COVID-19 were cough, fatigue, myalgia and headache; whereas self-reported fever (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.4 to 3.9), anosmia (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.4) and ageusia (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.8) were most strongly associated with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR or serology. RT-PCR cycle thresholds were lower in men, older patients, those with fever and arthralgia and closer to symptom onset. The rates of hospitalisation and death among 444 RT-PCR-positive cases were 6.7% and 0.7%, respectively, with older age and obesity more frequent in the hospitalised group. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 presents in a similar way to other mild community-acquired respiratory diseases, but the presence of fever, anosmia and ageusia can assist the specific diagnosis. Most patients recovered without requiring hospitalisation with a low fatality rate compared with other hospital-based studies

    Mortality among blood donors seropositive for Chaga´s Disease (1996 - 2000) in São Paulo: a medical record linkage study

    No full text
    INTRODUÇÃO: As taxas de mortalidade para doença de Chagas variam, consideravelmente de 0,2 a 19,2% anualmente dependendo principalmente do estágio da doença. Considera-se que pacientes na fase indeterminada tem taxas baixas, semelhante a população em geral. Este estudo compara a taxa de mortalidade e as causas de morte de doadores de sangue da Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo (FPS) soropositivos para a doença de Chagas e de doadores soronegativos para todos os testes de triagem realizados no processo de doação. Doadores de sangue constituem uma população, na qual os indivíduos soropositivos são em sua maioria assintomáticos. MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo de coorte retrospectiva de doadores de sangue de 1996 a 2000: 2842 doadores soropositivos para doença de Chagas e 5684 doadores soronegativos para todos os testes de triagem. O status vital foi designado realizando-se o relacionamento probabilístico de dados (RPD) utilizando-se o Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade do Brasil (SIM). Utilizamos um método RDP validado preliminarmente com sensibilidade de 94% (IC 95%, 90% - 97%), especificidade de 100% (IC 95%, 98% - 100%). Apenas os dados dos anos 2001 a 2009 do SIM foram disponibilizados para análise. Análise univariada foi conduzida considerando desfechos e fatores de riscos potenciais. Os testes Chi-quadrado e Exato de Fisher foram utilizados conforme apropriado. A diferença de sobrevida dos dois grupos no tempo foi graficamente representada pela Curva de Kaplan-Meyer e testado pelo teste Logrank. Regressões múltiplas de Cox foram utilizadas para derivação de riscos relativos instântaneos (hazard ratios - HR) para os desfechos do estudo, ajustando-se por varíaveis de confusão. RESULTADOS: RPD encontrou 159 óbitos entre os 2842 doadores soropositivos (5,6%) e 103 óbitos entre os 5684 doadores soronegativos (1,8%). A sorologia de doadores foi associada com óbitos relacionados a doença de Chagas (HR 2,3 - IC 95%: 1,8 - 3,0). As curvas de sobrevida foram diferentes quando comparando doadores soropositivos e soronegativos, jovens e velhos (p < 0,001). Das 159 mortes entre doadores soropositivos, 26 foram devidas a doença de Chagas (CID-10: B57.0 - B57.5), 47 foram devidas a outras doenças cardíacas (CDI-10: I10 a I80.2), sem menção a doença de Chagas como uma causa associada, e apenas 1 com menção a doença de Chagas na Parte II da declaração de óbito. CONCLUSÕES: Doadores de sangue soropositovs seguidos retrospectivamente por 9 a 14 anos morrem ao menos 2,3 vezes mais que doadores soronegativos. As causas de morte no SIM podem estar mal classificadas para os doadores de sangue soropositivos assintomáticosINTRODUCTION: Mortality rates for Chagas\' disease vary considerably between 0.2 and 19.2% annually depending mostly on the stage of the disease. Patients at the indeterminate phase are considered to have low rates, similar to the overall population. This study compares mortality rates and causes of death of blood donors seropositive for Chagas\' disease and seronegative for all screening tests at Fundação Pró-Sangue - Hemocentro de São Paulo (FPS). Blood donors constitute a particular population in which seropositive individuals are mostly asymptomatic. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of blood donors from 1996 to 2000: 2842 seropositive for Chagas disease and 5684 seronegative. Death status was ascertained by performing probabilistic record linkage (RL) with the national mortality information system (SIM). RL was validated in a preliminary study and sensitivity and specificity of the method were determined to be 94% (CI 95%, 90% - 97%) and 100% (CI 95%, 98% - 100%) respectively. Only SIM records for 2001 to 2009 were available for analysis. Univariate analysis was conducted considering outcomes and potential risks factors. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test were used as appropriate. The different survival of the two groups over time was graphically represented by the Kaplan-Meier curve and tested with the Logrank test. Multiple Cox regressions were used to derive Hazard ratios (HR) for the outcomes studied, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Reidentified 159 deaths among the 2842 seropositive blood donors (5.6%) and 103 deaths among the 5684 seronegative (1.8%). Serology of blood donors was associated with Chagas disease related death (HR 2.3 - 95% IC: 1.8 - 3.0). The survival curves differed when comparing seropositive and seronegative donors, young and old (p < 0.001). Out of the 159 deaths among seropositive donors, 26 were due to Chagas disease (ICD10 B57.0 - B57.5), 47 were due to other heart diseases (ICD10 - I10 to I80.2), with no mention of Chagas disease as an associated cause, and only 1 with Chagas disease mentioned in Part II of death certificate. CONCLUSIONS: Seropositive blood donors die at least 2.3 times more than seronegative donors. Causes of death in SIM may be misclassified for asymptomatic seropositive individual

    Accuracy of a probabilistic record-linkage methodology used to track blood donors in the Mortality Information System database

    No full text
    The probabilistic record linkage (PRL) is based on a likelihood score that measures the degree of similarity of several matching variables. Screening test results for different diseases are available for the blood donor population. In this paper, we describe the accuracy of a PRL process used to track blood donors from the Fundação Pró-Sangue (FPS) in the Mortality Information System (SIM), in order that future studies might determine the blood donor’s cause of death. The databases used for linkage were SIM and the database made up of individuals that were living (200 blood donors in 2007) and dead (196 from the Hospital das Clinicas de São Paulo that died in 2001-2005). The method consists of cleaning and linking the databases using three blocking steps comparing the variables “Name/Mother’s Name/ Date of Birth” to determine a cut-off score. For a cut-off score of 7.06, the sensitivity and specificity of the method is 94.4% (95%CI: 90.0-97.0) and 100% (95%CI: 98.0-100.0), respectively. This method can be used in studies that aim to track blood donors from the FPS database in SIM
    corecore