An instrument to measure atrial fibrillation knowledge in Chinese patients: validation of the Jessa Atrial fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire

Background: There is no validated tool to assess patients’ knowledge of oral anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation in China.Methods: Using a standard translation program, the Jessa Atrial fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ) was translated into Chinese. The reliability of the JAKQ was assessed by internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficient), repeatability (test-retest reliability), and sensitivity tests. Effectiveness was assessed by hypothesizing that a lower JAKQ score was a risk factor for bleeding. A total of 447 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were hospitalized between July 2019 and December 2021 were studied and followed up. Participants were followed up 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. Bleeding during follow-up was recorded. Data were obtained from hospital databases and telephone follow-up.Result: A total of 447 patients with AF completed JAKQ. The mean age of patients was 67.7 ± 10.2 years. The median JAKQ score was 31.3% (12.5–43.8). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of JAKQ was 0.616–0.637, and the test-retest reliability value was 0.902 (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the higher knowledge level of AF was associated with secondary education or above, an income of more than 2000 yuan, and a history of AF of more than 1 year. Bleeding was associated with a lower JAKQ score, hypertension, and a history of bleeding. Non-bleeding patients on VKA had a better understanding of how often INR should be monitored and what to do if an OAC dose was missed.Conclusion: The Chinese version of JAKQ shows good reliability and validity, indicating that it is a valuable tool for AF and oral anticoagulation (OAC) knowledge assessment. It can be used in clinical practice to guide educational activities and improve the effectiveness and safety of treatment. It was shown that Chinese patients with AF have insufficient knowledge about AF and OAC. Lower JAKQ scores are associated with bleeding, so targeted education is necessary. Targeted educational efforts should focus on patients recently diagnosed with AF and those with lower formal education and income

Baseline demographics of a contemporary Belgian atrial fibrillation cohort included in a large randomised clinical trial on targeted education and integrated care (AF-EduCare/AF-EduApp study)

BackgroundAs the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases worldwide and AF management becomes ever more diversified and personalised, insights into (regional) AF patient demographics and contemporary AF management are needed. This paper reports the current AF management and baseline demographics of a Belgian AF population recruited for a large multicenter integrated AF study (AF-EduCare/AF-EduApp study).MethodsWe analyzed data from 1,979 AF patients, assessed between 2018 and 2021 for the AF-EduCare/AF-EduApp study. The trial randomised consecutive patients with AF (irrespective of AF history duration) into three educational intervention groups (in person-, online-, and application-based), compared with standard care. Baseline demographics of both the included and excluded/refused patients are reported.ResultsThe mean age of the trial population was 71.2 ± 9.1 years, with a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.4 ± 1.8. Of all screened patients, 42.4% were asymptomatic at presentation. Being overweight was the most common comorbidty, present in 68.9%, while 65.0% were diagnosed with hypertension. Anticoagulation therapy was prescribed in 90.9% of the total population and in 94.0% of the patients with an indication for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Of the 1,979 assessed AF patients, 1,232 (62.3%) were enrolled in the AF-EduCare/AF-EduApp study, with transportation problems (33.4%) as the main reason for refusal/non-inclusion. About half of the included patients were recruited at the cardiology ward (53.8%). AF was first diagnosed, paroxysmal, persistent and permanent in 13.9%, 47.4%, 22.8% and 11.3%, respectively. Patients who refused or were excluded were older (73.3 ± 9.2 vs. 69.8 ± 8.9 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (CHA2DS2-VASc 3.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). The four AF-EduCare/AF-EduApp study groups were comparable across the vast majority of parameters.ConclusionsThe population showed high use of anticoagulation therapy, in line with current guidelines. In contrast to other AF trials about integrated care, the AF-EduCare/AF-EduApp study managed to incorporate all types of AF patients, both out-patient and hospitalised, with very comparable patient demographics across all subgroups. The trial will analyze whether different approaches to patient education and integrated AF care have an impact on clinical outcomes.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03707873?term=af-educare&draw=2&rank=1, identifier: NCT03707873; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03788044?term=af-eduapp&draw=2&rank=1, identifier: NCT03788044

Knowledge gaps in patients with venous thromboembolism : usefulness of a new questionnaire

The current awareness of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and knowledge of thromboprophylaxis among patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) are insufficient. We sought to develop and evaluate the usefulness of the Jessa AF Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ), modified for VTE patients. Consecutive patients at least 1 month since the VTE event (n = 273, mean [SD] age, 51 [17] years; 52.7%, women; 55.9%, unprovoked event) were enrolled to the study. The median percentage of correct responses was 64.2% (interquartile range, 53%-73%; minimum, 12%; maximum, 100%). Younger patients had better knowledge about VTE in general, including a higher proportion of correct responses to the question about the definition of PE (71.4% vs 57.7%, P = 0.03), about the possible consequence of DVT, including PE (81.1% vs 62%, P = 0.001) and VTE risk related to long travels (78.1% vs 59.2%, P = 0.002). There was no difference in overall scoring between patients taking new oral anticoagulants and those taking vitamin K antagonists (mean [SD], 64.1% [16.3%] vs 63.9% [13.8%], respectively, P = 0.7). Regardless of the type of anticoagulants, 39.3% of patients knew that VTE is not always symptomatic, 33.6% knew what to do when they missed an OAC dose, and 50% did not know which painkillers are the safest in combination with anticoagulants. Education applied in 27 patients resulted in an increase in the median percentage of correct responses from 60% to 80% (P = 0.0001). Knowledge on VTE and anticoagulation is suboptimal among patients on VKA and NOACs. Education of VTE patients should be improved especially in older individuals on NOACs

Engagement of atrial fibrillation patients with the AF-EduApp, a new mobile application to support AF management

IntroductionA multidisciplinary approach is needed for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in which the patient has a central role. Smart devices create opportunities to improve AF management. This paper aimed to evaluate the in-house developed AF-EduApp application on its usability, satisfaction, and communication effectiveness with the care team.MethodsDuring a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial, 153 AF patients were included in the AF-EduApp study, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and a maximum follow-up of 15 months if taking oral anticoagulation (OAC). The AF-EduApp contains six main modules: Questionnaires, Education, Measurement data entry, Medication overview with reminders, Appointments, and Communication with the care team. The App focuses on four main goals: (1) to improve AF knowledge, (2) to increase self-care capabilities, (3) electronic monitoring to improve therapy adherence to OAC, and (4) communication with the care team. Patients unable to use the AF-EduApp were assigned to a no-App control group (n = 41) without intervention comparable to the standard care group (SC, n = 346) of the AF-EduCare study.ResultsA total of 152 patients effectively used the App during a mean follow-up of 386.8 ± 108. 1 days (one included patient could not install the application due to an iPhone from the United States). They opened the application on average on 130.1 ± 144.7 days. Of the 109 patients still in follow-up after 12 months (i.e. patients who did not withdraw and on OAC), 90 patients (82.6%) actively used the application at least one day in the next 41 days. The Measurement module was the most used, with a median of used days over the total available days of 6.4%. A total of 75 App patients (49.3%) asked questions, mostly clinical-related questions (e.g. medication use, or actionability on clinical entered parameters). A mean score of 8.1 ± 1.7 about the “perceived quality of follow-up in the past year” was given by the App ITT patients, compared to a score of 7.7 ± 2.0 by the SC group (P = .072). Patients who used the App were more attracted to future follow-up with an application compared to patients who would be capable of using the application of the SC group (31.6% vs. 12.5%; P < .001).ConclusionThis study showed a positive attitude towards using a mobile application, with AF patients using the application one-third of the available days. Patients used the App most for entering measured parameters, and to contact the care team

Multimorbidity management in atrial fibrillation:The Polish perspective in the EHRA-PATHS study

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia which places a significant bur-den on individuals as well as the healthcare system. AF management requires a multidisciplinary approach in which tackling comorbidities is an important aspect. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate how multimorbidity is currently assessed and managed and to determine if interdisciplinary care is undertaken. Methods: A 21-item online survey was undertaken over four weeks as part of the EHRA-PATHS study examining comorbidities in AF and distributed to European Heart Rhythm Association members in Europe. Results: A total of 341 eligible responses were received, of which 35 (10%) were from Polish physi-cians. Compared to other European locations, the rates of specialist services and referrals varied but were not significantly different. However, there were higher numbers of specialized services reported in Poland compared to the rest of Europe for hypertension (57% vs. 37%; P = 0.02) and palpita-tions/arrhythmias (63% vs. 41%; P = 0.01), whereas rates of sleep apnea services and comprehensive geriatric care tended to be lower (20% vs. 34%; P = 0.10 and 14% vs. 36%; P = 0.01, respectively). The only statistical difference in reasons for referral rates between Poland and the rest of Europe was the barrier relating to insurance and financial reasons (31% vs. 11%; P <0.01, respectively). Conclusions: There is a clear need for an integrated approach to patients with AF and associated comorbidities. Preparedness of Polish physicians to deliver such care seems to be similar to other European countries but may be hampered by financial obstacles

Polish regional differences in patient knowledge on atrial fibrillation and its management as well as in patterns of oral anticoagulant prescription

Background: The Jessa Atrial Fibrillation Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ) was successfully used to assess knowledge gaps in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Aims: To evaluate the regional differences among Polish patients in their awareness of AF diagnosis and oral anticoagulation use. Methods: A total of 1583 patients with AF at a median (IQR) age of 72 (66–79) years completed the JAKQ in 3 cardiology centers (center I, Kraków; center II, Toruń; center III, Kielce) from January 2017 to June 2018. The final analysis included 1525 patients, 32.9% were on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and 67.1% on non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs), that is, rivaroxaban and dabigatran (28.9% each), and apixaban (9.3%). Results: The mean (SD) score on the JAKQ was 55.5% (18.4%) with better results among patients on VKAs compared with NOACs (58% [18.3%] vs 54.3% [18.4%]; P = 0.0002) with time from AF diagnosis more than 12 months (57.4% [17.5%] vs 50% [19.9%]; P &lt; 0.0001). There was a significant difference in the knowledge scores between the 3 centers (I, 59.5%; II, 48.5%; III, 54.3%; P &lt; 0.0001). In all centers the number of correct answers correlated inversely with patient’s age (r = –0.20; P &lt; 0.0001). NOACs were more frequently used in center III. The percentage of correct responses was lower in patients on reduced NOAC doses (35.4% of patients on NOACs), compared with the full-dose NOAC groups in center I (56.9% vs 62.5%; P = 0.012) and II (48.1% vs 56.2%; P = 0.003). Conclusions: Patients from a high-volume academic center showed better knowledge than their peers from district hospitals. There are large regional differences in prescription patterns of oral anticoagulants, including the preferred NOAC

Feasible approaches and implementation challenges to atrial fibrillation screening: a qualitative study of stakeholder views in 11 European countries

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening may increase early detection and reduce complications of AF. European, Australian and World Heart Federation guidelines recommend opportunistic screening, despite a current lack of clear evidence supporting a net benefit for systematic screening. Where screening is implemented, the most appropriate approaches are unknown. We explored the views of European stakeholders about opportunities and challenges of implementing four AF screening scenarios.Design: Telephone-based semi-structured interviews with results reported using Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. Data were thematically analysed using the framework approach.Setting: AF screening stakeholders in 11 European countries.Participants: Healthcare professionals and regulators (n=24) potentially involved in AF screening implementation.Intervention: Four AF screening scenarios: single time point opportunistic, opportunistic prolonged, systematic single time point/prolonged and patient-led screening.Primary outcome measures: Stakeholder views about the challenges and feasibility of implementing the screening scenarios in the respective national/regional healthcare system.Results: Three themes developed. (1) Current screening approaches: there are no national AF screening programmes, with most AF detected in symptomatic patients. Patient-led screening exists via personal devices, creating screening inequity. (2) Feasibility of screening: single time point opportunistic screening in primary care using single-lead ECG devices was considered the most feasible. Software algorithms may aid identification of suitable patients and telehealth services have potential to support diagnosis. (3) Implementation requirements: sufficient evidence of benefit is required. National screening processes are required due to different payment mechanisms and health service regulations. Concerns about data security, and inclusivity for those without primary care access or personal devices must be addressed.Conclusions: There is an overall awareness of AF screening. Opportunistic screening appears the most feasible across Europe. Challenges are health inequalities, identification of best target groups for screening, streamlined processes, the need for evidence of benefit and a tailored approach adapted to national realities

Multimorbid management in atrial fibrillation: The Polish perspective in the EHRA-PATHS study

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and places a significant burden on individuals as well as the healthcare system. AF management requires a multidisciplinary approach in which tackling comorbidities is an important aspect. AIMS: To evaluate how multimorbidity is currently assessed and managed and to determine if interdisciplinary care is undertaken. METHODS: A 21-item online survey was undertaken over four weeks as part of the EHRA-PATHS study examining comorbidities in Atrial Fibrillation and distributed  to European Heart Rhythm Association members in Europe. RESULTS: A total of 341 eligible responses were received of which 35 (10%) were from Polish physicians. Compared to other European locations, the rates of specialist services and referrals varied but were not significantly different. However, there were higher numbers of specialised services reported in Poland compared to the rest of Europe for hypertension (57% vs. 37%;  P = 0.02) and palpitations/arrhythmias (63% vs. 41%; P = 0.01) and the rates of sleep apnea services tended to be lower (20% vs. 34%; P = 0.10) and comprehensive geriatric care (14% vs. 36%; P = 0.01). The only statistical difference between Poland and the rest of Europe in reasons for referral rates was the barrier relating to insurance and financial reasons (31% vs. 11%; P &lt;0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for an integrated approach to patients with AF and associated comorbidities. Prepardeness of Polish physicians to deliver such care seems to be similar to other European countries but may be hampered by financial obstacles