Dose dependent effect of statins on postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery among patients treated with beta blockers

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous studies on the effects of Statins in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery have shown conflicting results. Whether statins prevent AF in patients treated with postoperative beta blockers and whether the statin-effect is dose related are unknown.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively studied 1936 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n = 1493) or valve surgery (n = 443) at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. All patients were in sinus rhythm before the surgery. Postoperative beta blockers were administered routinely (92% within 24 hours postoperatively).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean age was 66+10 years and 68% of the patients were taking Statins. Postoperative AF occurred in 588 (30%) patients and led to longer length of stay in the intensive care unit versus those without AF (5.1+7.6 days versus 2.5+2.3 days, p < 0.0001). Patients with a past history of AF had a 5 times higher risk of postoperative AF (odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval 3.4 to 7.7; p < 0.0001). AF occurred in 31% of patients taking statins versus 29% of the others (p = 0.49). In multivariable analysis, statins were not associated with AF (odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7 to 1.2; p = 0.59). However, in a subgroup analysis, the patients treated with Simvastatin >20 mg daily had a 36% reduction in the risk of postoperative AF (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.6; p = 0.03) in comparison to those taking lower dosages.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Among cardiac surgery patients treated with postoperative beta blockers Statin treatment reduces the incidence of postoperative AF when used at higher dosages</p

2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease

The recommendations listed in this document are, whenever possible, evidence based. An extensive evidence review was conducted as the document was compiled through December 2008. Repeated literature searches were performed by the guideline development staff and writing committee members as new issues were considered. New clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals and articles through December 2011 were also reviewed and incorporated when relevant. Furthermore, because of the extended development time period for this guideline, peer review comments indicated that the sections focused on imaging technologies required additional updating, which occurred during 2011. Therefore, the evidence review for the imaging sections includes published literature through December 2011

Minimal starting time of data reconstruction for qualitative myocardial perfusion rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging

Objective Qualitative positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) scans are reconstructed with a delay after an injection of rubidium-82 (82 Rb) to ensure blood pool clearance and sufficient left ventricle to myocardium contrast. Our aim was to derive the minimal starting time of data reconstruction (STDR) after an injection of 82 Rb for which the diagnostic value and image quality remained unaffected. Materials and methods We retrospectively included 23 patients who underwent rest-stress 82 Rb PET MPI using 740 MBq. Patients fulfilling one of the two criteria indicating a slow blood pool clearance (ejection fraction <50% and/or cardiac output <3 l/min) were included in a consecutive manner. PET images using five different STDRs (1:15-2:15 min) were reconstructed and compared with reference images (STDR of 2:30 min). Differences in the summed rest score greater than or equal to 3 and total perfusion deficit greater than 3% were considered to significantly influence the diagnostic value. In addition, image quality was scored by two experts as not interpretable, inferior, adequate, or excellent. Results The summed rest score differed greater than or equal to 3 from the reference in seven or more patients (≥30%) using STDR less than or equal to 2:00 min (P<0.02). STDR less than or equal to 1:30 min resulted in six or more patients (≥26%) with a total perfusion deficit difference greater than 3% (P<0.03). In addition, STDR less than or equal to 2:00 min resulted in a lower image quality (P<0.002) and STDR less than or equal to 2:15 min resulted in greater than or equal to two scans with noninterpretable image quality. Conclusion STDR less than or equal to 2:15 min resulted in lower diagnostic value or insufficient image quality for qualitative PET MPI using 740 MBq 82 Rb. An STDR of 2:30 min can be considered for clinical adoption