8 research outputs found
Bar graphs showing by-species patterns of change in RVFV seropositivity before, during, and after the 2006–2007 RVF epizootic.
<p>Bar graphs showing by-species patterns of change in RVFV seropositivity before, during, and after the 2006–2007 RVF epizootic.</p
RVF risk quantified in a 75 km radius from each sample location.
<p>RVF risk quantified in a 75 km radius from each sample location.</p
Monthly predicted RVF risk assessment map overlaid with serological results collected after the 2006–2007 RVF outbreak; A) Marsabit, Mandera, and Wajir in January and February 2008, B) Marsabit, Mandera, and Wajir in August and September 2008, C) Ijara, Klegdela, Marsabit, Meru, Tana, and Tsavo in October and November 2008.
<p>See Fig. 4 for descriptive legend.</p
Map of Kenya showing 2000–2009 serology sample locations and relevant Kenya conservation areas.
<p>Map of Kenya showing 2000–2009 serology sample locations and relevant Kenya conservation areas.</p
Bar graphs showing by-location patterns of change in RVFV seropositivity before, during, and after the 2006–2007 RVF epizootic.
<p>Bar graphs showing by-location patterns of change in RVFV seropositivity before, during, and after the 2006–2007 RVF epizootic.</p
Wildlife sera collected in different locations during pre-epizootic, epizootic, and post epizootic RVF outbreak in Kenya.
<p>The results of the analysis of the RVFV antibodies in the samples by recombinant N inhibition ELISA are indicated.</p
Monthly predicted RVF risk assessment map overlaid with serological results collected prior to the 2006–2007 RVF outbreak; A) Tsavo East in September and October 2000, B) Garissa in October and November 2000, C) Laikipia in June and July 2000, and D) Amboseli in October and November 2000.
<p>The light green background color shows the extent of the potential epizootic region and high risk is indicated by red color in 1 km<sup>2</sup> pixels. Magenta lines represent polygons for conservation areas such as national parks or preserves. For each sample month, the left-hand map shows the RVF risk conditions for the prior month, and the right-hand map shows the month the samples were taken, along with sample locations. Below the maps for sample months, pie charts show the proportion of samples found to be RVF seropositive for each species, by location. Only locations sampled in that month are plotted.</p
Monthly predicted RVF risk assessment map overlaid with serological results collected during the 2006–2007 RVF outbreak; A) Laikipia and Naivasha in December and January 2006, B) Maasai and Nakuru in January and February 2007, and C) Isiolo and Naivasha in May and Jun 2007.
<p>See Fig. 4 for descriptive legend.</p