Antithrombin levels are associated with the risk of first and recurrent arterial thromboembolism at a young age

Background and aims: It is as yet unknown whether antithrombin levels are associated with arterial thromboembolism (ATE) at a young age. To investigate the association between antithrombin levels and premature and recurrent ATE, we performed a case-control study and a subsequent nested cohort study of p

In silico evaluation of limited sampling strategies for individualized dosing of extended half-life factor IX concentrates in hemophilia B patients

PURPOSE: Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder, caused by a factor IX (FIX) deficiency. Recently, FIX concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) have become available. Prophylactic dosing of EHL-FIX concentrates can be optimized by assessment of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. To determine these parameters, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) may be applied. The study aims to establish adequate LSSs for estimating individual PK parameters of EHL-FIX concentrates using in silico evaluation. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to obtain FIX activity versus time profiles using published population PK models for N9-GP (Refixia), rFIXFc (Alprolix), and rIX-FP (Idelvion). Fourteen LSSs, containing three or four samples taken within 8 days after administration, were formulated. Bayesian analysis was applied to obtain estimates for clearance (CL), half-life (t(1/2)), time to 1% (Time(1%)), and calculated weekly dose (Dose(1%)). Bias and precision of these estimates were assessed to determine which LSS was adequate. RESULTS: For all PK parameters of N9-GP, rFIXFc and rIX-FP bias was generally acceptable (range: −5% to 5%). For N9-GP, precision of all parameters for all LSSs was acceptable (< 25%). For rFIXFc, precision was acceptable for CL and Time(1%), except for t(1/2) (range: 27.1% to 44.7%) and Dose(1%) (range: 12% to 29.4%). For rIX-FP, all LSSs showed acceptable bias and precision, except for Dose(1%) using LSS with the last sample taken on day 3 (LSS 6 and 10). CONCLUSION: Best performing LSSs were LSS with samples taken at days 1, 5, 7, and 8 (N9-GP and rFIXFc) and at days 1, 4, 6, and 8 (rIX-FP), respectively

COVID-19-associated immune thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia is a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in patients with the new severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus, SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 infection).1 Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 patients may be caused by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), sepsis or drug-induced. Recently a single case report suggested immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may be associated with COVID-19 infection.2 ITP is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by a platelet count < 100x109/L, leading to an increased bleeding risk.3 Several risk factors have been described for ITP including environmental (e.g. infection, malignancy and drugs) and genetic predisposition.4 We report here the first case series of three patients with ITP associated with COVID-19 infection

Plasmin-mediated activation of the coagulation system. :A study of patients with acute ischemic heart disease treated with recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator

We have studied the response of haemostatic reaction products in peripheral blood of patients with acute ischaemic heart disease receiving combined recombinant tissue type plasminogen activator/heparin therapy. We have found evidence that formation of excessive amounts of plasmin in vivo in relation to such therapy significantly enhances the degradation of fibrin, and of fibrinogen as well as the formation of thrombin. We conclude that excessive plasmin formation by thrombolytic therapy causes systemic effects including activation of coagulation.</p

Plasmin-mediated activation of the coagulation system. :A study of patients with acute ischemic heart disease treated with recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator

We have studied the response of haemostatic reaction products in peripheral blood of patients with acute ischaemic heart disease receiving combined recombinant tissue type plasminogen activator/heparin therapy. We have found evidence that formation of excessive amounts of plasmin in vivo in relation to such therapy significantly enhances the degradation of fibrin, and of fibrinogen as well as the formation of thrombin. We conclude that excessive plasmin formation by thrombolytic therapy causes systemic effects including activation of coagulation.</p

Effect of antithrombotic stewardship on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy during and after hospitalization

Background Although the benefits of antithrombotic drugs are indisputable to reduce thrombotic events, they carry a high risk of compromising patient safety. No previous studies investigated the implementation and (cost-) effectiveness of a hospital-based multidisciplinary antithrombotic team on bleeding and thrombotic outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to compare the proportion of patients with a composite end point consisting of one or more bleeding episodes or one or more thrombotic event from hospitalization until three months after hospitalization. Methods and findings A prospective, multicenter before-after intervention study was conducted in two Dutch hospitals. Adult patients hospitalized between October 2015 and December 2017 treated with anticoagulant therapy were included. The primary aim was to estimate the proportion of patients with a composite end point consisting of one or more bleeding episodes or one or more thrombotic event from hospitalization until three months after hospitalization. The intervention was the implementation of a multidisciplinary antithrombotic team focusing on education, medication reviews by pharmacists, implementing of local anticoagulant therapy guidelines based on national guidelines, patient counselling and medication reconciliation at admission and discharge. The primary endpoint was analysed using segmented linear regression. We obtained data for 1,886 patients: 941 patients were included in the usual care period and 945 patients in the intervention period. The S-team study showed that implementation of a multidisciplinary antithrombotic team over time significantly reduced the composite end point consisting of one or more bleeding episodes or one or more thrombotic event from hospitalization until three months after hospitalization in patients using anticoagulant drugs (-1.83% (-2.58% to -1.08%) per 2 month period). Conclusions This study shows that implementation of a multidisciplinary antithrombotic team over time significantly reduces the composite end point consisting of one or more bleeding episodes or one or more thrombotic event from hospitalization until three months after hospitalization in patients using anticoagulant drugs

Criteria for low von Willebrand factor diagnosis and risk score to predict future bleeding

Background: Important diagnostic and clinical aspects of moderately reduced von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels are still unknown. There is no clear evidence which cutoff value (0.50 vs 0.60 IU/ml) should be used to diagnose “low VWF.” Also, the incidence of bleeding after the diagnosis has been made, and risk factors for bleeding are unknown yet. Objectives: To investigate the incidence of postsurgical bleeding, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and traumatic and spontaneous bleeding after low VWF diagnosis, and to develop a risk score to predict future bleeding. Methods: We performed a cohort study in patients with historically lowest VWF levels of 0.31 to 0.60 IU/ml. Clinical data of patients were retrospectively collected. Results: We included 439 patients with low VWF. During a follow-up of 6.3 ± 3.7 years, 259 surgical procedures, 81 deliveries, and 109 spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes were reported. The incidence of postsurgical bleeding was 2.7%, whereas 10% of deliveries was complicated by PPH. Overall, 65 patients (14.8%) had bleeding requiring treatment, which was not different between patients with historically lowest VWF levels of 0.31–0.50 and 0.51–0.60 IU/ml (p =.154). Age <18 years, abnormal bleeding score at diagnosis, and being referred for bleeding symptoms at the time of diagnosis were independent risk factors for bleeding during follow-up, and therefore included in the risk score. Conclusions: The cutoff value of low VWF diagnosis should be set at 0.60 IU/ml. Furtherm

Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A:implications for clinical practice

Background: Desmopressin is frequently used perioperatively in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. However, increase in factor (F)VIII:C after desmopressin use is interindividually highly variable. Tachyphylaxis has only been reported in test setting for persons with hemophilia A, with a remaining response of approximately 70% after a second dose compared with that after a first dose.Objectives:To study tachyphylaxis of FVIII:C response after multiple administration(s) of desmopressin in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Methods: We studied FVIII:C levels after desmopressin before (day 0 [D0]) and on days 1 (D1) and 2 (D2) after surgery in 26 patients of the DAVID and Little DAVID studies. We studied tachyphylaxis by comparing the responses at D1 and D2 with that at D0. We also assessed the reproducibility of the D0 response in comparison to an earlier performed desmopressin test. Results: The median absolute FVIII:C increase was 0.50 IU/mL (0.35-0.74; n = 23) at D0, 0.21 IU/mL (0.14-0.28; n = 17) at D1, and 0.23 IU/mL (0.16-0.30; n = 11) at D2. The median percentage of FVIII increase after the second administration (D1) compared with the first (D0) was 42.9% (29.2%-52.5%; n = 17) and that of the third (D2) compared with the first (D0) was 36.4% (23.7%-46.9%; n = 11). The FVIII:C desmopressin response at D0 was comparable with the desmopressin test response in 74% of the patients. Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis in the surgical setting was considerably more pronounced than previously reported, with FVIII:C at D1 and D2 of 36% to 43% of the initial response. Our results may have important implications for monitoring repeated desmopressin treatment when used perioperatively.</p