5 research outputs found

    Actividad de ceftolozano-tazobactam en aislados clínicos de Pseudomonas aeruginosa multirresistente y extremadamente resistente en un hospital español

    Get PDF
    Objetivos: Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la sensibilidad in vitro de ceftolozano-tazobactam en aislados clínicos de P. aeruginosa multirresistente (MDR) y extremadamente resistente (XDR) desde Febrero de 2016 a Octubre de 2017 en el Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza (España). Material y métodos: Evaluamos la actividad in vitro de ceftolozano-tazobactam y otros antibióticos anti-pseudomónicos en 12 aislados de P. aeruginosa MDR y en 117 aislados XDR, no productores de metalo-ß-lactamasas. Se determinó la concentración mínima inhibitoria (CMI) de ceftolozano-tazobactam mediante tiras de difusión en gradiente. Resultados: Entre los 129 aislados MDR/XDR incluidos, 119 (92, 2%) fueron sensibles a ceftolozano-tazobactam, y diez (7, 8%) presentaron resistencia. La CMI50 fue de 2 mg/L, y la CMI90 de 4 mg/L. Ceftolozano-tazobactam fue el segundo antibiótico más activo después de colistina, superando a amikacina. Conclusiones: Ceftolozano-tazobactam es una opción de tratamiento válida para infecciones causadas por P. aeruginosa MDR y XDR en nuestro entorno. Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) non metallo-ß-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates at Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet (Zaragoza, Spain) from February 2016 to October 2017. Material and methods: We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and other antipseudomonal antibiotics against 12 MDR and 117 XDR non metallo-ß-lactamase producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Ceftolozane-tazobactam minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by MIC gradient diffusion test strip. Results: Among the 129 MDR/XDR isolates included, 119 (92.2%) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, and ten (7.8%) were resistant. MIC 50 was 2 mg/L, and MIC 90 4 mg/L. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the second most active antibiotic after colistin, overtaking amikacin. Conclusions: Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a valuable treatment option for MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections in our setting

    Comparing Two Automated Techniques for the Primary Screening-Out of Urine Culture

    Get PDF
    Urinary tract infection is the most common human infection with a high morbidity. In primary care and hospital services, conventional urine culture is a key part of infection diagnosis but results take at least 24 h. Therefore, a rapid and reliable screening method is still needed to discard negative samples as quickly as possible and to reduce the laboratory workload. In this aspect, this study aims to compare the diagnostic performance between Sysmex UF-1000i and FUS200 systems in comparison to urine culture as the gold standard. From March to June 2016, 1,220 urine samples collected at the clinical microbiology laboratory of the “Miguel Servet” hospital were studied in parallel with both analysers, and some technical features were evaluated to select the ideal equipment. The most balanced cut-off values taking into account bacteria or leukocyte counts were 138 bacteria/μL or 119.8 leukocyte/μL for the UF-1000i (95.3% SE and 70.4% SP), and 5.7 bacteria/μL or 4.3 leukocyte/μL for the FUS200 (95.8% SE and 44.4% SP). The reduction of cultured plates was 37.4% with the FUS200 and 58.3% with the UF-1000i. This study shows that both techniques improve the workflow in the laboratory, but the UF-1000i has the highest specificity at any sensitivity and the FUS200 needs a shorter processing time

    Ten Issues for Updating in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: An Expert Review

    Get PDF
    Community-acquired pneumonia represents the third-highest cause of mortality in industrialized countries and the first due to infection. Although guidelines for the approach to this infection model are widely implemented in international health schemes, information continually emerges that generates controversy or requires updating its management. This paper reviews the most important issues in the approach to this process, such as an aetiologic update using new molecular platforms or imaging techniques, including the diagnostic stewardship in different clinical settings. It also reviews both the Intensive Care Unit admission criteria and those of clinical stability to discharge. An update in antibiotic, in oxygen, or steroidal therapy is presented. It also analyzes the management out-of-hospital in CAP requiring hospitalization, the main factors for readmission, and an approach to therapeutic failure or rescue. Finally, the main strategies for prevention and vaccination in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts are reviewed
    corecore