Bench-to-bedside review: Current evidence for extracorporeal albumin dialysis systems in liver failure

Acute liver failure ( ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure ( AoCLF) carry a high mortality. The rationale for extracorporeal systems is to provide an environment facilitating recovery or a window of opportunity for liver transplantation. Recent technologies have used albumin as a scavenging molecule. Two different albumin dialysis systems have been developed using this principle: MARS ( Molecular Adsorbent Recirculation System) and SPAD ( Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis). A third system, Prometheus ( Fractionated Plasma Separation and Adsorption), differs from the others in that the patient's albumin is separated across a membrane and then is run over adsorptive columns. Although several trials have been published ( particularly with MARS), currently there is a lack of controlled studies with homogenous patient populations. Many studies have combined patients with ALF and AoCLF. Others have included patients with different etiologies. Although MARS and Prometheus have shown biochemical improvements in AoCLF and ALF, additional studies are required to show conclusive benefit in short- and long-term survival. The appropriate comparator is standard medical therapy rather than head-to-head comparisons of different forms of albumin dialysi

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis presenting with purpura fulminans, meningitis, or meningococcal disease: a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in recent clinical studies

INTRODUCTION: We report data from adult and pediatric patients with severe sepsis from studies evaluating drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) and presenting with purpura fulminans (PF), meningitis (MEN), or meningococcal disease (MD) (PF/MEN/MD). Such conditions may be associated with an increased bleeding risk but occur in a relatively small proportion of patients presenting with severe sepsis; pooling data across clinical trials provides an opportunity for improving the characterization of outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of placebo-controlled, open-label, and compassionate-use trials was conducted. Adult patients received infusions of either DrotAA or placebo. All pediatric patients (<18 years old) received DrotAA. 189 adult and 121 pediatric patients presented with PF/MEN/MD. RESULTS: Fewer adult patients with PF/MEN/MD met cardiovascular (68.3% versus 78.8%) or respiratory (57.8% versus 80.5%) organ dysfunction entry criteria than those without. DrotAA-treated adult patients with PF/MEN/MD (n = 163) had an observed 28-day mortality rate of 19.0%, a 28-day serious bleeding event (SBE) rate of 6.1%, and an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rate of 4.3%. Six of the seven ICHs occurred in patients with MEN (three of whom were more than 65 years old with a history of hypertension). DrotAA-treated adult patients without PF/MEN/MD (n = 3,088) had an observed 28-day mortality rate of 25.5%, a 28-day SBE rate of 5.8%, and an ICH rate of 1.0%. In contrast, a greater number of pediatric patients with PF/MEN/MD met the cardiovascular organ dysfunction entry criterion (93.5% versus 82.5%) than those without. DrotAA-treated PF/MEN/MD pediatric patients (n = 119) had a 14-day mortality rate of 10.1%, an SBE rate of 5.9%, and an ICH rate of 2.5%. DrotAA-treated pediatric patients without PF/MEN/MD (n = 142) had a 14-day mortality rate of 14.1%, an SBE rate of 9.2%, and an ICH rate of 3.5%. CONCLUSION: DrotAA-treated adult patients with severe sepsis presenting with PF/MEN/MD had a similar SBE rate, a lower observed 28-day mortality rate, and a higher observed rate of ICH than DrotAA-treated patients without PF/MEN/MD. DrotAA-treated pediatric patients with severe sepsis with PF/MEN/MD may differ from adults, because all three outcome rates (SBE, mortality, and ICH) were lower in pediatric patients with PF/MEN/MD

Magnetic resonance imaging in comatose adults resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A posthoc study of the Targeted Therapeutic Mild Hypercapnia after Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest trial

Background Neuroimaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may assist clinicians in evaluating brain injury and optimising care in comatose adults resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, contemporary international data on its use are lacking. Aim The primary aim was to compare the patient characteristics, early postresuscitation care, and neurological outcomes of patients according to MRI use. Methods We performed a posthoc analysis of the Targeted Therapeutic Mild Hypercapnia after Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (TAME) trial, a multinational randomised trial comparing targeted mild hypercapnia or normocapnia in comatose adults after OHCA. Results After exclusions, 1639 patients enrolled in the TAME trial were analysed. Of these, 149 (9%) had an MRI. Compared to non-MRI patients, MRI patients were younger (58.9 versus 61.7 years, p: 0.02), had a longer median time from OHCA to return of spontaneous circulation (30 versus 25 min, p < 0.0001), and had a higher average arterial lactate level (8.78 versus 6.74 mmol/L, p < 0.0001) on admission to hospital. MRI patients were more likely to receive additional advanced diagnostic assessments during intensive care unit admission (p < 0.0001). At 6 months, 23 of 140 patients (16.4%) in the MRI group had a favourable neurological outcome, compared with 659 of 1399 patients (47.1%) in the no-MRI group (p < 0.001). On multivariable modelling, country of enrolment was the dominating predictor in the likelihood of an MRI being performed. Conclusions In the TAME trial, 9% of patients had an MRI during their intensive care unit admission. Among these patients, only 16% had a favourable neurological outcome at 6 months

Clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 registered in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium WHO clinical characterisation protocol:a prospective, multinational, multicentre, observational study

Due to the large number of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), many were treated outside the traditional walls of the intensive care unit (ICU), and in many cases, by personnel who were not trained in critical care. The clinical characteristics and the relative impact of caring for severe COVID-19 patients outside the ICU is unknown. This was a multinational, multicentre, prospective cohort study embedded in the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium World Health Organization COVID-19 platform. Severe COVID-19 patients were identified as those admitted to an ICU and/or those treated with one of the following treatments: invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, inotropes or vasopressors. A logistic generalised additive model was used to compare clinical outcomes among patients admitted or not to the ICU. A total of 40 440 patients from 43 countries and six continents were included in this analysis. Severe COVID-19 patients were frequently male (62.9%), older adults (median (interquartile range (IQR), 67 (55–78) years), and with at least one comorbidity (63.2%). The overall median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 10 (5–19) days and was longer in patients admitted to an ICU than in those who were cared for outside the ICU (12 (6–23) days versus 8 (4–15) days, p&lt;0.0001). The 28-day fatality ratio was lower in ICU-admitted patients (30.7% (5797 out of 18 831) versus 39.0% (7532 out of 19 295), p&lt;0.0001). Patients admitted to an ICU had a significantly lower probability of death than those who were not (adjusted OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.65–0.75; p&lt;0.0001). Patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to an ICU had significantly lower 28-day fatality ratio than those cared for outside an ICU

Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 in adults and children

Different neurological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults and children and their impact have not been well characterized. We aimed to determine the prevalence of neurological manifestations and in-hospital complications among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and ascertain differences between adults and children. We conducted a prospective multicentre observational study using the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium (ISARIC) cohort across 1507 sites worldwide from 30 January 2020 to 25 May 2021. Analyses of neurological manifestations and neurological complications considered unadjusted prevalence estimates for predefined patient subgroups, and adjusted estimates as a function of patient age and time of hospitalization using generalized linear models. Overall, 161 239 patients (158 267 adults; 2972 children) hospitalized with COVID-19 and assessed for neurological manifestations and complications were included. In adults and children, the most frequent neurological manifestations at admission were fatigue (adults: 37.4%; children: 20.4%), altered consciousness (20.9%; 6.8%), myalgia (16.9%; 7.6%), dysgeusia (7.4%; 1.9%), anosmia (6.0%; 2.2%) and seizure (1.1%; 5.2%). In adults, the most frequent in-hospital neurological complications were stroke (1.5%), seizure (1%) and CNS infection (0.2%). Each occurred more frequently in intensive care unit (ICU) than in non-ICU patients. In children, seizure was the only neurological complication to occur more frequently in ICU versus non-ICU (7.1% versus 2.3%, P &lt; 0.001). Stroke prevalence increased with increasing age, while CNS infection and seizure steadily decreased with age. There was a dramatic decrease in stroke over time during the pandemic. Hypertension, chronic neurological disease and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were associated with increased risk of stroke. Altered consciousness was associated with CNS infection, seizure and stroke. All in-hospital neurological complications were associated with increased odds of death. The likelihood of death rose with increasing age, especially after 25 years of age. In conclusion, adults and children have different neurological manifestations and in-hospital complications associated with COVID-19. Stroke risk increased with increasing age, while CNS infection and seizure risk decreased with age

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Sepsis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Epidemiology and Outcomes

ABSTRACT:Background:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality include older age, co-morbidity, and TBI severity. Few studies have investigated the role of sepsis in individuals with TBI.Methods:We studied adult patients with TBI admitted to intensive care over a 5-year period. Patient characteristics were identified by linking clinical and administrative databases. Charts of individuals with TBI and sepsis were manually reviewed. Predictors of ICU and hospital mortality were identified using logistic regression modeling.Results:Four hundred eighty-six individuals with TBI were admitted to intensive care. Sixteen (3.3%) developed sepsis. Pneumonia was the most common source (94%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (75%). ICU lengths of stay (LOS) (12.2 days [interquartile range (IQR) 4.4–23.5] versus 3.7 days [IQR 1.7–8.2]; p &lt; 0.001) and hospital LOS (28.0 days [IQR 11.8–41.4] versus 15.3 days [IQR 5.0–30.9]; p = 0.017) were longer in patients with TBI and sepsis. Sepsis was not associated with ICU (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51; 95%CI 0.12–2.27; p = 0.38) or hospital (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.21–2.96; p = 0.78) mortality, though age (aOR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.04; p = 0.014 for hospital mortality), severe TBI (aOR 3.71; 95% CI 1.52–9.08; p = 0.004 for ICU mortality and 4.10; 95% CI 1.95–8.65; p &lt; 0.001 for hospital mortality), and APACHE II score (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.11–1.28; p &lt; 0.001 for ICU mortality and 1.22; 95% CI 1.14–1.31; p &lt; 0.001 for hospital mortality) were.Conclusion:Sepsis in patients with TBI was not associated with mortality; however, sepsis was associated with increased health care utilization (ICU and hospital LOS).</jats:sec

Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients

Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients.BackgroundWe determined the effect of regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill subjects suffering from acute renal failure who were not at high risk for hemorrhagic complications.MethodsBetween April 1999 and June 2002, 30 critically ill subjects requiring continuous renal replacement therapy and using 79 hemofilters were randomly assigned to receive regional citrate or systemic heparin anticoagulation.ResultsThe median hemofilter survival time was 124.5 hours (95% CI 95.3 to 157.4) in the citrate group, which was significantly longer than the 38.3 hours (95% CI 24.8 to 61.9) in the heparin group (P < 0.001). Increasing illness severity score, male gender, and decreasing antithrombin-III levels were independent predictors of an increased relative hazard of hemofilter failure. After adjustment for illness severity, antithrombin-III levels increased significantly more over the period of study in the citrate as compared to the heparin group (P = 0.038). Moreover, after adjustment for antithrombin-III levels and illness severity score, the relative risk of hemorrhage with citrate anticoagulation was significantly lower than that with heparin (relative risk of 0.14; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.96, P = 0.05).ConclusionCompared with systemic heparin anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation significantly increases hemofilter survival time, and significantly decreases bleeding risk in critically ill patients suffering from acute renal failure and requiring continuous renal replacement therapy