Management of Penicillin Allergy in the Perioperative Setting

The selection of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is challenging in patients with a history of penicillin allergy; as such, we present a literature review exploring current best practices and the associated supporting evidence, as well as areas for future research. Guidelines recommend the use of alternative agents in patients with an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction, but those alternative agents are associated with worse outcomes, including an increased risk of surgical site infection, and higher cost. More recent data suggest that the risk of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin, is extremely low, and that cefazolin can be used safely in most penicillin-allergic patients. Studies have therefore explored how best to implement first-line cefazolin use in patients with a penicillin allergy label. A variety of interventions, including preoperative allergy de-labeling with incorporation of penicillin skin testing, use of patient risk-stratification questionnaires, and utilization of clinician algorithms to guide antibiotic selection intraoperatively, have all been shown to significantly increase cefazolin utilization without a corresponding increase in adverse events. Further studies are needed to clarify the most effective interventions and implementation strategies, as well as to evaluate whether patients with severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin should continue to be excluded from receipt of other beta-lactams

Chapter 15 - Treatment of Ocular Pain Not Responsive to Traditional Dry Eye Disease Treatments

Neuropathic ocular pain (NOP) in dry eye disease can be a challenging condition to treat. The pathogenesis of NOP often results from injury to the corneal nerves, leading to neural plasticity and peripheral and central neuronal sensitization. These patients often present with ocular pain, allodynia, photophobia, and neuro-behavioral manifestations and seldom respond to traditional dry eye treatments. For the treatment of NOP, the goal is to use a multimodal approach addressing both the peripheral and centralized pain using a host of topical and systemic therapies. Topical therapies include contact lenses and nerve regenerative therapies such autologous serum tears. Systemic therapies often used for other neuropathic pain conditions can potentially be helpful in NOP; these medications consist of gabapentinoids and other anticonvulsants, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Further, procedural therapies such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and peri-orbital nerve blocks may be useful in patients who are refractory to topical and systemic therapies. Lastly, since NOP can have a significant negative impact on quality-of-life measures with regard to mood, sleep, activity, adjunctive behavioral therapy may be beneficial. Ultimately, a personalized multimodal therapy will often be necessary to address the complex mechanisms underlying NOP

Amlodipine-induced angioedema: An unusual complication of a common medication

Hypersensitivity reactions to dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB) are exceedingly rare, although sporadic reports of isolated angioedema seem to be gradually increasing in frequency. We present a case of angioedema likely triggered by amlodipine

Disease burden and predictors associated with non-response to antihistamine-based therapy in chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background: H1-antihistamines (H1AH) are the first-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), but 50% of patients have inadequate disease control at standard doses. Objective: To assess the comorbidity burden and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with non-response to H1AH-based treatments; to identify predictors of non-response. Methods: Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset (2007–2020) was used to identify adult patients with CSU who initiated a H1AH, alone or in combination with other oral non-biologics (index treatment). Based on twelve-month treatment patterns observed after index treatment initiation, patients were categorized as responders (continued index treatment or had only 1 next H1AH treatment without corticosteroids) or non-responders (continued corticosteroids or had 2 or more treatment switches). Patient characteristics and HRU were assessed in the 12 months before (baseline) and ≥12 months after (follow-up) index treatment initiation. Baseline predictors associated with non-response were identified using machine learning. Results: There were 17 062 patients who met inclusion criteria, and 14824 (86.9%) were classified as non-responders. A higher proportion of non-responders had records of CSU-related symptoms, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and certain laboratory tests than responders at baseline. A higher proportion of non-responders than responders visited an allergist or dermatologist during follow-up (59.5% vs 53.0%). Non-responders had a larger increase in hospitalizations (15.7% vs −2.4%) than responders during follow-up vs baseline. Predictors of non-response included index and baseline treatment classes, types of specialists seen, chronic pulmonary disease, depression, and female sex. Conclusion: A large proportion of CSU patients treated with H1AH-based therapies had uncontrolled disease, contributing to increased HRU and patient burden. Non-responders had more comorbidities and HRU at baseline and follow-up, with steep increases in follow-up hospitalizations relative to baseline, highlighting an urgent need for early disease control

Allergy Electronic Health Record Documentation: A 2022 Work Group Report of the AAAAI Adverse Reactions to Drugs, Biologicals, and Latex Committee

The allergy section of the electronic health record (EHR) is ideally reviewed and updated by health care workers during routine outpatient visits, emergency room visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and surgical procedures. This EHR section has the potential to help proactively and comprehensively avoid exposures to drugs, contact irritants, foods, and other agents for which, based on an individual\u27s medical history and/or genetics, there is increased risk for adverse outcomes with future exposures. Because clinical decisions are made and clinical decision support is triggered based on allergy details from the EHR, the allergy module needs to provide meaningful, accurate, timely, and comprehensive allergy information. Although the allergy section of the EHR must meet these requirements to guide appropriate clinical decisions and treatment plans, current EHR allergy modules have not achieved this standard. We urge EHR vendors to collaborate with allergists to optimize and modernize allergy documentation. A work group within the Adverse Reactions to Drugs, Biologicals, and Latex Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology was formed to create recommendations for allergy documentation in the EHR. Whereas it is recognized that the term allergy is often used incorrectly because most adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are not true immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions, allergy in this article includes allergies and hypersensitivities as well as side effects and intolerances. Our primary objective is to provide guidance for the current state of allergy documentation in the EHR. This guidance includes clarification of the definition of specific ADR types, reconciliation of confirmed ADRs, and removal of disproved or erroneous ADRs. This document includes a proposal for the creation, education, and implementation of a drug allergy labeling system that may allow for more accurate EHR documentation for improved patient safety

Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection using circulating antibody secreting cells

Background Streptococcus pneumoniae infections cause morbidity and mortality worldwide. A rapid, simple diagnostic method could reduce the time needed to introduce definitive therapy potentially improving patient outcomes. Methods We introduce two new methods for diagnosing S. pneumoniae infections by measuring the presence of newly activated, pathogen-specific, circulating Antibody Secreting Cells (ASC). First, ASC were detected by ELISpot assays that measure cells secreting antibodies specific for signature antigens. Second, the antibodies secreted by isolated ASC were collected in vitro in a novel matrix, MENSA (media enriched with newly synthesized antibodies) and antibodies against S. pneumoniae antigens were measured using Luminex immunoassays. Each assay was evaluated using blood from S. pneumoniae and non-S. pneumoniae-infected adult patients. Results We enrolled 23 patients with culture-confirmed S. pneumoniae infections and 24 controls consisting of 12 non-S. pneumoniae infections, 10 healthy donors and two colonized with S. pneumoniae. By ELISpot assays, twenty-one of 23 infected patients were positive, and all 24 controls were negative. Using MENSA samples, four of five S. pneumoniae-infected patients were positive by Luminex immunoassays while all five non-S. pneumoniae-infected patients were negative. Conclusion Specific antibodies produced by activated ASC may provide a simple diagnostic for ongoing S. pneumoniae infections. This method has the potential to diagnose acute bacterial infections

Standards for practical intravenous rapid drug desensitization & delabeling: A WAO committee statement

International audienceDrug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to intravenous drugs can be severe and might leave patients and doctors in a difficult position where an essential treatment or intervention has to be suspended. Even if virtually any intravenous medication can potentially trigger a life-threatening DHR, chemotherapeutics, biologics, and antibiotics are amongst the intravenous drugs most frequently involved in these reactions. Admittedly, suspending such treatments may negatively impact the survival outcomes or the quality of life of affected patients. Delabeling pathways and rapid drug desensitization (RDD) can help reactive patients stay on first-choice therapies instead of turning to less efficacious, less cost-effective, or more toxic alternatives. However, these are high-complexity and high-risk techniques, which usually need expert teams and allergy-specific techniques (skin testing, in vitro testing, drug provocation testing) to ensure safety, an accurate diagnosis, and personalized management. Unfortunately, there are significant inequalities within and among countries in access to allergy departments with the necessary expertise and resources to offer these techniques and tackle these DHRs optimally. The main objective of this consensus document is to create a great benefit for patients worldwide by aiding allergists to expand the scope of their practice and support them with evidence, data, and experience from leading groups from around the globe. This statement of the Drug Hypersensitivity Committee of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) aims to be a comprehensive practical guide on the technical aspects of implementing acute-onset intravenous hypersensitivity delabeling and RDD for a wide range of drugs. Thus, the manuscript does not only focus on clinical pathways. Instead, it also provides guidance on topics usually left unaddressed, namely, internal validation, continuous quality improvement, creating a healthy multidisciplinary environment, and redesigning care (including a specific supplemental section on a real-life example of how to design a dedicated space that can combine basic and complex diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in allergy)

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology:Allergic rhinitis - 2023

Background: In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document. Methods: ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. Results: ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. Conclusion: The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment