35 research outputs found
Auditory cueing strategy for stride length and cadence modification: a feasibility study with healthy adults
People with Parkinson's Disease experience gait impairments that
significantly impact their quality of life. Visual, auditory, and tactile cues
can alleviate gait impairments, but they can become less effective due to the
progressive nature of the disease and changes in people's motor capability. In
this study, we develop a human-in-the-loop (HIL) framework that monitors two
key gait parameters, stride length and cadence, and continuously learns a
person-specific model of how the parameters change in response to the feedback.
The model is then used in an optimization algorithm to improve the gait
parameters. This feasibility study examines whether auditory cues can be used
to influence stride length in people without gait impairments. The results
demonstrate the benefits of the HIL framework in maintaining people's stride
length in the presence of a secondary task.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures; the paper is accepted and presented at EMBC 202
Object Handovers: a Review for Robotics
This article surveys the literature on human-robot object handovers. A
handover is a collaborative joint action where an agent, the giver, gives an
object to another agent, the receiver. The physical exchange starts when the
receiver first contacts the object held by the giver and ends when the giver
fully releases the object to the receiver. However, important cognitive and
physical processes begin before the physical exchange, including initiating
implicit agreement with respect to the location and timing of the exchange.
From this perspective, we structure our review into the two main phases
delimited by the aforementioned events: 1) a pre-handover phase, and 2) the
physical exchange. We focus our analysis on the two actors (giver and receiver)
and report the state of the art of robotic givers (robot-to-human handovers)
and the robotic receivers (human-to-robot handovers). We report a comprehensive
list of qualitative and quantitative metrics commonly used to assess the
interaction. While focusing our review on the cognitive level (e.g.,
prediction, perception, motion planning, learning) and the physical level
(e.g., motion, grasping, grip release) of the handover, we briefly discuss also
the concepts of safety, social context, and ergonomics. We compare the
behaviours displayed during human-to-human handovers to the state of the art of
robotic assistants, and identify the major areas of improvement for robotic
assistants to reach performance comparable to human interactions. Finally, we
propose a minimal set of metrics that should be used in order to enable a fair
comparison among the approaches.Comment: Review paper, 19 page