The role of bacterial stimuli in inflammation-driven bone formation

Immune cells and their soluble factors regulate skeletal cells during normal bone regeneration and pathological bone formation. Bacterial infections can trigger immune responses that activate pro-osteogenic pathways, but these are usually overshadowed by osteolysis and concerns of systemic inflammation. The aim of this study was to determine whether the transient local inflammatory reaction to non-viable bacterial immune agonists could lead to favourable new bone formation. In a series of rabbit studies, as proof-of-concept, how tibial intramedullary injection of viable or killed bacterial species affected bone remodelling and new bone formation was determined. Application of killed bacteria led to considerable new bone formation after 4 weeks, without the prolonged systemic inflammation and exaggerated bone lysis seen with active infection. The osteo-immunomodulatory effects of various species of killed bacteria and the dose response relationship were subsequently screened in ectopically-implanted ceramic scaffolds. Histomorphometry after 8 weeks showed that a relatively low dose of killed bacteria enhanced ectopic bone induction. Moreover, lipoteichoic acid - the bacterial cell-wall derived toll-like-receptor (TLR)-2 activator - was identified as an osteo-stimulatory factor. Collectively, the data indicated that bacterial stimuli could be harnessed to stimulate osteogenesis, which occurs through a synergy with osteoinductive signals. This finding holds promise for the use of non-viable bacteria, bacterial antigens, or their simplified analogues as immuno-modulatory bone regenerating tools in bone biomaterials.Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanic

Benchmarking recent national practice in rectal cancer treatment with landmark randomized controlled trials

Contains fulltext : 175601.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

Cross-Sectional Study on MRI Restaging After Chemoradiotherapy and Interval to Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Influence on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

Background. The time interval between CRT and surgery in rectal cancer patients is still the subject of debate. The aim of this study was to first evaluate the nationwide use of restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its impact on timing of surgery, and, second, to evaluate the impact of timing of surgery after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on short- and long-term outcomes.Methods. Patients were selected from a collaborative rectal cancer research project including 71 Dutch centres, and were subdivided into two groups according to time interval from the start of preoperative CRT to surgery (= 14 weeks), and the long-interval group included a higher proportion of cT4 stage and multivisceral resection patients. Pathological complete response rate (n = 34 [15.2%] vs. n = 47 [18.7%], p = 0.305) and CRM involvement (9.7% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.145) did not significantly differ. Thirty-day surgical complications were similar (20.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.943), however no significant differences were found for local and distant recurrence rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival.Conclusions. These real-life data, reflecting routine daily practice in The Netherlands, showed substantial variability in the use and timing of restaging MRI after preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, as well as time interval to surgery. Surgery before or after 14 weeks from the start of CRT resulted in similar short- and long-term outcomes.Surgical oncolog