Neuromuscular blockade during therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: Observational study of neurological and infectious outcomes

AbstractIntroductionNeuromuscular blockade (NMB) is widely used during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after cardiac arrest but its effect on patient outcomes is unclear. We compared the effects of NMB on neurological outcomes and frequency of early-onset pneumonia in cardiac-arrest survivors managed with TH.MethodsWe retrospectively studied consecutive adult cardiac-arrest survivors managed with TH in a tertiary-level intensive care unit between January 2008 and July 2013. Patients given continuous NMB for persistent shivering were compared to those managed without NMB. Cases of early-onset pneumonia and vital status at ICU discharge were recorded. To avoid bias due to between-group baseline differences, we adjusted the analysis on a propensity score.ResultsOf 311 cardiac-arrest survivors, 144 received TH, including 117 with continuous NMB and 27 without NMBs. ICU mortality was lower with NMB (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [0.32; 0.89], p=0.016) but the difference was not significant after adjustment on the propensity score (HR, 0.70 [0.39; 1.25], p=0.22). The proportion of patients with good neurological outcomes was not significantly different (36% with and 22% without NMB, p=0.16). Early-onset pneumonia was more common with NMB (HR, 2.36 [1.24; 4.50], p=0.009) but the difference was not significant after adjustment on the propensity score (HR, 1.68 [0.90; 3.16], p=0.10).ConclusionsContinuous intravenous NMB during TH after cardiac arrest has potential owns effects on ICU survival with a trend increase in the frequency of early-onset pneumonia. Randomised controlled trials are needed to define the role for NMB among treatments for TH-induced shivering

Fréquence de la visite post-natale pour les femmes ayant accouché au CH de Dieppe et place du médecin généraliste dans cette pratique

Les enquêtes descriptives sont rares sur la visite post-natale concernant la mère. Cependant, cette visite, obligatoire par la loi, effectuée 6 à 8 semaines après l'accouchement, est indispensable pour aborder les problèmes du périnée, de l'allaitement, de la contraception, de l'état émotionnel, de la relation mère-enfant et pour vérifier l'état immunitaire. L'objectif de notre travail est d'évaluer, en première intention, la fréquence de la visite post-natale pour les femmes ayant accouché au CH de Dieppe et le rôle du médecin traitant dans cette visite, et, en deuxième intention, d'évaluer les pratiques cliniques concernant les différents items abordés lors de cette visite. Une étude prospective a été réalisée au sein de 76 patientes présentes en unité de suite de couches du 10/12/2008 au 10/03/2009. Un questionnaire a été rempli 4 mois après leur accouchement. La fréquence de la visite post natale a été évaluée à 68% IC95% (0.58-0.78). La majorité des femmes n'ayant pas effectué cet examen (54%) ont justifié leur abstention en répondant que cet examen ne leur a pas été proposé. On constate également que la visite post-natale a été peu pratiquée par le médecin généraliste (12% des cas). Par contre, notre étude montre une augmentation significative de la fréquence de la visite post-natale lorsque ce sujet a été abordé pendant une consultation avec le généraliste (88% vs 54%, p<0.05). Concernant la rééducation du périnée, ce sujet a été abordé par 93% des praticiens. Elle est souvent proposée systématiquement, dans 41% des cas, contrairement aux recommandations. A propos de la contraception, les pilules microprogestatives ont été la référence en cas d'allaitement maternel et les pilules oestroprogestatives dans le cas contraire. Concernant l'allaitement maternel, 57% des femmes interrogées ont allaité leur enfant, chiffre comparable au taux d'allaitement estimé à 63% en France. Les troubles de l'humeur et de la relation mère enfant ont été peu abordés lors des consultations (9% et 32%). Le sujet de la vaccination contre la rubéole et la coqueluche a été plus souvent abordé par le médecin généraliste que le spécialiste, (66% vs 21%), (88% vs 42%). Pour améliorer l'observance de la visite post natale, on peut proposer au médecin généraliste d'aborder systématiquement le sujet de la visite post-natale.ROUEN-BU Médecine-Pharmacie (765402102) / SudocSudocFranceF

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial

International audienceIntubation of hypoxemic patients is associated with life-threatening adverse events. High-flow therapy by nasal cannula (HFNC) for preoxygenation before intubation has never been assessed by randomized study. Our objective was to evaluate the efficiency of HFNC for preoxygenation, compared to high fraction-inspired oxygen facial mask (HFFM)

Epidural analgesia in ICU chest trauma patients with fractured ribs: retrospective study of pain control and intubation requirements

International audienceBackground Nonintubated chest trauma patients with fractured ribs admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for complications and may require invasive ventilation at some point. Effective pain control is essential. We assessed whether epidural analgesia (EA) in patients with fractured ribs who were not intubated at ICU admission decreased the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We also looked for risk factors for IMV. Study design and methods This retrospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in 40 ICUs in France included consecutive patients with three or more fractured ribs who were not intubated at admission between July 2013 and July 2015. Results Of the 974 study patients, 788 were included in the analysis of intubation predictors. EA was used in 130 (16.5%) patients, and 65 (8.2%) patients required IMV. Factors independently associated with IMV were chronic respiratory disease (P = 0.008), worse SAPS II (P < 0.0001), flail chest (P = 0.02), worse Injury Severity Score (P = 0.0003), higher respiratory rate at admission (P = 0.02), alcohol withdrawal syndrome (P < 0.001), and noninvasive ventilation (P = 0.04). EA was not associated with decreases in IMV requirements, median numerical rating scale pain score, or intravenous morphine requirements from day 1 to day 7. Conclusions EA was not associated with a lower risk of IMV in chest trauma patients with at least 3 fractured ribs, moderate pain, and no intubation on admission. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal pain control strategy in chest trauma patients admitted to the ICU, notably those with severe pain or high opioid requirements

S'appuyer sur l'oxymétrie de pouls pour éviter l'hypoxémie et l'hyperoxie : une étude de cohorte prospective multicentrique chez des patients en insuffisance circulatoire

International audiencePurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the predictive performance of pulse oximetry (SpO2) to rule out hypoxaemia and hyperoxia in critically ill patients.MethodsSpO2, arterial oxygenation (SaO2), and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) were prospectively and simultaneously measured every 6 h during the first 24 h of intensive care unit admission in a multicentre cohort of critically ill patients suffering acute circulatory failure. Likelihood ratios associated with different cutoff values of SpO2 to rule out hypoxaemia (SaO2 95% or PaO2 > 100 mmHg) and post-test probabilities were calculated. Mean bias between SpO2 and SaO2 and agreement interval were calculated. Area under the receiver operating characteristics associated with SpO2 to predict different threshold values of SaO2 and PaO2 were calculated.ResultsFive hundred seventy-one patients (mean [standard deviation] Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: 58.7 [20.1]; mechanically ventilated 75.6%) with 2643 available SaO2 and PaO2 samples and corresponding 2643 SpO2 values were analysed. Mean bias between SpO2 and SaO2 was 1.1%, and its agreement interval ranged from −8.2 to +11.1%. SpO2 cutoff values of 88%, 90%, and 92% left the possibility that 8%–13% of patients had hypoxaemia. SpO2 < 95% left the possibility that 31% of patients had hyperoxia. All calculated areas under the receiver operating characteristics showed a lower limit of their 95% confidence interval below 0.85ConclusionIn this cohort of patients with circulatory failure, SpO2 had poor discriminative ability to rule out hypoxaemia and hyperoxia. Overconfidence upon SpO2 monitoring may be dangerous

Pressure-Support Ventilation vs T-Piece During Spontaneous Breathing Trials Before Extubation Among Patients at High Risk of Extubation Failure

International audienceBackgroundSpontaneous breathing trial (SBT) using a T-piece remains the most frequently performed trial before extubation in ICUs.Research QuestionWe aimed at determining whether initial SBT using pressure-support ventilation (PSV) could increase successful extubation rates among patients at high risk of extubation failure.Study Design and MethodsPost hoc analysis of a multicenter trial focusing on reintubation in patients at high-risk of extubation failure. The initial SBT was performed using PSV or T-piece according to the physician/center decision. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully extubated 72 hours after initial SBT, that is, extubated after initial SBT and not reintubated within the following 72 hours.ResultsAmong the 641 patients included in the original study, initial SBT was performed using PSV (7.0 cm H2O in median without positive end-expiratory pressure) in 243 patients (38%) and using a T-piece in 398 patients (62%). The proportion of patients successfully extubated 72 hours after initial SBT was 67% (162/243) using PSV and 56% (223/398) using T-piece (absolute difference 10.6%; 95% CI, 2.8 to 28.1; P = .0076). The proportion of patients extubated after initial SBT was 77% (186/283) using PSV and 63% (249/398) using T-piece (P = .0002), whereas reintubation rates within the following 72 hours did not significantly differ (13% vs 10%, respectively; P = .4259). Performing an initial SBT using PSV was independently associated with successful extubation (adjusted OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.18; P = .0061).InterpretationIn patients at high risk of extubation failure in the ICU, performing an initial SBT using PSV may hasten extubation without an increased risk of reintubation

Non-invasive ventilation versus high-flow nasal oxygen for postextubation respiratory failure in ICU: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

International audienceAbstract Background In intensive care units (ICUs), patients experiencing post-extubation respiratory failure have poor outcomes. The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to treat post-extubation respiratory failure may increase the risk of death. This study aims at comparing mortality between patients treated with NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen or high-flow nasal oxygen alone. Methods Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial focusing on patients who experienced post-extubation respiratory failure within the 7 days following extubation. Patients were classified in the NIV group or the high-flow nasal oxygen group according to oxygenation strategy used after the onset of post-extubation respiratory failure. Patients reintubated within the first hour after extubation and those promptly reintubated without prior treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was mortality at day 28 after the onset of post-extubation respiratory failure. Results Among 651 extubated patients, 158 (25%) experienced respiratory failure and 146 were included in the analysis. Mortality at day 28 was 18% (15/84) using NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen and 29% (18/62) with high flow nasal oxygen alone (difference, − 11% [95% CI, − 25 to 2]; p = 0.12). Among the 46 patients with hypercapnia at the onset of respiratory failure, mortality at day 28 was 3% (1/33) with NIV and 31% (4/13) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone (difference, − 28% [95% CI, − 54 to − 6]; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients reintubated 48 h after the onset of post-extubation respiratory failure was 44% (37/84) with NIV and 52% (32/62) with high-flow nasal oxygen alone ( p = 0.21). Conclusions In patients with post-extubation respiratory failure, NIV alternating with high-flow nasal oxygen might not increase the risk of death. Trial registration number The trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the registration number NCT03121482 the 20th April 2017

Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial

International audienceBackground: Glucocorticoids probably improve outcomes in patients hospitalised for community acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this a priori planned exploratory subgroup analysis of the phase 3 randomised controlled Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock (APROCCHSS) trial, we aimed to investigate responses to hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone between CAP and non-CAP related septic shock.Methods: APROCCHSS was a randomised controlled trial that investigated the effects of hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone, drotrecogin-alfa (activated), or both on mortality in septic shock in a two-by-two factorial design; after drotrecogin-alfa was withdrawn on October 2011, from the market, the trial continued on two parallel groups. It was conducted in 34 centres in France. In this subgroup study, patients with CAP were a preselected subgroup for an exploratory secondary analysis of the APROCCHSS trial of hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone in septic shock. Adults with septic shock were randomised 1:1 to receive, in a double-blind manner, a 7-day treatment with daily administration of intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg bolus every 6h and a tablet of 50 μg of fludrocortisone via the nasogastric tube, or their placebos. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge, 28-day and 180-day mortality, the number of days alive and free of vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, or organ failure, and ICU and hospital free-days to 90-days. Analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00625209).Findings: Of 1241 patients included in the APROCCHSS trial, CAP could not be ruled in or out in 31 patients, 562 had a diagnosis of CAP (279 in the placebo group and 283 in the corticosteroid group), and 648 patients did not have CAP (329 in the placebo group and 319 in the corticosteroid group). In patients with CAP, there were 109 (39%) deaths of 283 patients at day 90 with hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone and 143 (51%) of 279 patients receiving placebo (odds ratio [OR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·43-0·83). In patients without CAP, there were 148 (46%) deaths of 319 patients at day 90 in the hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone group and 157 (48%) of 329 patients in the placebo group (OR 0·95, 95% CI 0·70-1·29). There was significant heterogeneity in corticosteroid effects on 90-day mortality across subgroups with CAP and without CAP (p=0·046 for both multiplicative and additive interaction tests; moderate credibility). Of 1241 patients included in the APROCCHSS trial, 648 (52%) had ARDS (328 in the placebo group and 320 in the corticosteroid group). There were 155 (48%) deaths of 320 patients at day 90 in the corticosteroid group and 186 (57%) of 328 patients in the placebo group. The OR for death at day 90 was 0·72 (95% CI 0·53-0·98) in patients with ARDS and 0·85 (0·61-1·20) in patients without ARDS (p=0·45 for multiplicative interaction and p=0·42 for additive interaction). The OR for observing at least one serious adverse event (corticosteroid group vs placebo) within 180 days post randomisation was 0·64 (95% CI 0·46-0·89) in the CAP subgroup and 1·02 (0·75-1·39) in the non-CAP subgroup (p=0·044 for multiplicative interaction and p=0·042 for additive interaction).Interpretation: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS trial of patients with CAP and septic shock, hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone reduced mortality as compared with placebo. Although a large proportion of patients with CAP also met criteria for ARDS, the subgroup analysis was underpowered to fully discriminate between ARDS and CAP modifying effects on mortality reduction with corticosteroids. There was no evidence of a significant treatment effect of corticosteroids in the non-CAP subgroup.Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health, by Programme d'Investissements d'Avenir, France 2030, and IAHU-ANR-0004